| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2004 12:34 pm Post subject: "BDS" or "Whidbey" |
|
|
What is your choice "BDS" or "Whidbey" and why?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Liz Guest
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2004 12:48 pm Post subject: Re: "BDS" or "Whidbey" |
|
|
<Hierta Joujlazowisk> wrote:
| Quote: | What is your choice "BDS" or "Whidbey" and why?
|
Well heres my answer, my frist reaction was WTF is Whidbey...
:P
BDS rules :p
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2004 12:52 pm Post subject: Re: "BDS" or "Whidbey" |
|
|
WTF ?
| Quote: | Well heres my answer, my frist reaction was WTF is Whidbey...
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Liz Guest
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2004 1:01 pm Post subject: Re: "BDS" or "Whidbey" |
|
|
<Hierta Joujlazowisk> wrote:
Um, What the F*** :P
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] Guest
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2004 1:02 pm Post subject: Re: "BDS" or "Whidbey" |
|
|
<Hierta Joujlazowisk> wrote:
| Quote: | What is your choice "BDS" or "Whidbey" and why?
|
Hierta, please don't multi-post. I already answered in a different
newsgroup. Followup set to that group.
Anyway, asking in a Delphi group will likely get you replies in favour
of BDS, especially since Whidbey doesn't do Delphi. <g>
--
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] http://rvelthuis.bei.t-online.de
"I've just learned about his illness. Let's hope it's nothing trivial."
-- Irvin S. Cobb
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] Guest
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2004 1:08 pm Post subject: Re: "BDS" or "Whidbey" |
|
|
Liz wrote:
| Quote: | Hierta Joujlazowisk> wrote:
WTF ?
Um, What the F***
|
I can only hope you meant Fart. Otherwise, I'd have to cancel that. <g>
--
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] http://rvelthuis.bei.t-online.de
"Distrust any enterprise that requires new clothes."
- Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Liz Guest
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2004 1:33 pm Post subject: Re: "BDS" or "Whidbey" |
|
|
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] wrote:
| Quote: | I can only hope you meant Fart. Otherwise, I'd have to cancel that.
g
|
You can smell them from there?? wow.. Im impressive.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2004 1:46 pm Post subject: Re: "BDS" or "Whidbey" |
|
|
I was expecting a bit more "technical" explanation.
I think I'm on wrong group (*.non-technical) for this.
I've asked the same question (why either "BDS" or "Whidbey" is your choice)
both in Delphi and BCB *.non-tehcnical groups just to get different opinions
if the programming language itself is one of the reason for selecting BDS.
Since .Net is a component oriented development framework, what BDS users can
expect/find more in BDS thatWhidbey can not give?
I suspect being a RAD tool with the VCL (or prematurely killed CLX) does not
mean anything for Delphi and BCB any more. From my understanding any
development environment supporting the .Net is a RAD environment. So what is
the point(s) selecting BDS and relying on open ended promises of Borland?
| Quote: | Well heres my answer, my frist reaction was WTF is Whidbey...
Can't post that here.
Well, the polite form is: What The Freak.
....
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] http://rvelthuis.bei.t-online.de
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris Brooksbank Guest
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2004 2:43 pm Post subject: Re: "BDS" or "Whidbey" |
|
|
Well Whidbey is the next release of Visual Studio now called Visual Studio
2005, due next summer.
But I dont know what BDS is !
"Liz" <liz_wants_no_spam (AT) xcalibur (DOT) nospam.co.uk> wrote
| Quote: | Hierta Joujlazowisk> wrote:
What is your choice "BDS" or "Whidbey" and why?
Well heres my answer, my frist reaction was WTF is Whidbey...
:P
BDS rules :p
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Liz Guest
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2004 3:14 pm Post subject: Re: "BDS" or "Whidbey" |
|
|
Chris Brooksbank wrote:
| Quote: | Well Whidbey is the next release of Visual Studio now called Visual
Studio 2005, due next summer.
But I dont know what BDS is !
|
Ah, Borland Development Studio I believe
Hence the d2k5 trial goes into c:program filesborlandbds3.0 :P
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John Jacobson Guest
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2004 3:30 pm Post subject: Re: "BDS" or "Whidbey" |
|
|
<Hierta Joujlazowisk> wrote
| Quote: | Since .Net is a component oriented development framework, what BDS users
can expect/find more in BDS thatWhidbey can not give?
|
They can re-use all their existing Delphi code base. Can't do that in VS.NET
or Whidbey.
(Some of us write code that is actually worth keeping and reusing.)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Liz Guest
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2004 3:43 pm Post subject: Re: "BDS" or "Whidbey" |
|
|
John Jacobson wrote:
| Quote: | (Some of us write code that is actually worth keeping and reusing.)
|
And sometimes we just keep it anyway
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris Brooksbank Guest
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:49 pm Post subject: Re: "BDS" or "Whidbey" |
|
|
"(Some of us write code that is actually worth keeping and reusing.) "
Most of the code I see that is being kept is pretty crap from a software
engineering view, but it does the job - so the reason is financial rather
than because it was coded/designed well !
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Larry Drews Guest
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2004 5:43 pm Post subject: Re: "BDS" or "Whidbey" |
|
|
"Chris Brooksbank" <NoSpamPlease@Somewhere> wrote in
news:41caf8ca$2 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com:
| Quote: | "(Some of us write code that is actually worth keeping and reusing.) "
Most of the code I see that is being kept is pretty crap from a
software engineering view, but it does the job - so the reason is
financial rather than because it was coded/designed well !
|
While I like well-designed code as much as the next developer, I try to
never forget that the reason I (we) are programming is strictly financial.
IMHO very few of us are doing it for the artistry.
From a financial point of view, the only justification for well-designed
and well-implemented code is that it costs less in the short run or long
run, reduces time to implement, or actually does a better job business-wise
than crappy code.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|