 |
BorlandTalk.com Borland discussion newsgroups
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Rhys Sage Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2003 10:13 pm Post subject: Computer Courses |
|
|
Today, out of interest, I looked to see what computer courses were available
locally. I was expecting to see courses in C++, Delphi, C# etc. when I
picked up the local brochure.
What did I find? A lot of courses that defy belief. Perhaps the piece de
resistace were the 3 levels of "Flight Simulation Workshop". Immediately,
looking at that, the thought came to mind: "how to write flight simulators"
which would have been a very narrow course aim with extremely limited market
appeal given that there are at least half a dozen really good ones out
there. Then I read the course description which essentially boiled down to
"how to play Microsoft Flight Simulator". Now I realise that local colleges
have become an entertainment medium.
Is anywhere else like this? There were page after page of courses in my area
that offered this kind of joke course.
--
Yours,
Rhys Sage.
www.sageworld.freeserve.co.uk for
code snippets and software downloads.
--
Vini vidi vici
--
(Team Zip)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Edward Diener Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2003 10:51 pm Post subject: Re: Computer Courses |
|
|
Rhys Sage wrote:
| Quote: | Today, out of interest, I looked to see what computer courses were
available locally. I was expecting to see courses in C++, Delphi, C#
etc. when I picked up the local brochure.
What did I find? A lot of courses that defy belief. Perhaps the piece
de resistace were the 3 levels of "Flight Simulation Workshop".
Immediately, looking at that, the thought came to mind: "how to write
flight simulators" which would have been a very narrow course aim
with extremely limited market appeal given that there are at least
half a dozen really good ones out there. Then I read the course
description which essentially boiled down to "how to play Microsoft
Flight Simulator". Now I realise that local colleges have become an
entertainment medium.
Is anywhere else like this? There were page after page of courses in
my area that offered this kind of joke course.
|
Welcome to the age of the dumbing down of all culture.
A student in an "advanced" high school English class which I was teaching
was telling me that movies were much more important than literature, and he
really couldn't see why he had to read literature but his parents were
making him take the advance course anyway. This was an "advanced" student
and he couldn't fathom why one should read Shakespeare instead of watching
wahtever was the at his local movie theatre or on his DVD player. Imagine
then what the "non-advanced" students are like.
Soon popular music will be declared much more vital to people's
understanding than Mozart and Bach, and no doubt adverisements will be
declared more interesting than Rembrandt, Vermeer, and Monet.
Where it will end is in people whose stupidity is so vast and uniform that
they can be manipulated as surely as any dictator has done in the past,
without the need for any type of physical coercion. That is the effect of
most education today, and your report from the trenches of computer learning
just verifies it in that area. But I have already had it verified in nearly
every other area of intellectual life in my own experience.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Benny Hill Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2003 11:26 pm Post subject: Re: Computer Courses |
|
|
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 18:51:09 -0400, Edward Diener wrote:
| Quote: | A student in an "advanced" high school English class which I was teaching
was telling me that movies were much more important than literature, and he
really couldn't see why he had to read literature but his parents were
making him take the advance course anyway. This was an "advanced" student
and he couldn't fathom why one should read Shakespeare instead of watching
wahtever was the at his local movie theatre or on his DVD player. Imagine
then what the "non-advanced" students are like.
|
If it makes you feel any better Edward, I could easily have been that
advanced student. When I was in high school I had no desire to read
anything more challenging or meaningful than the latest sci-fi/fantasy
books from my favorite authors.
However, after taking a literature class in college (and possibly growing
up a little bit ) I realized that Shakespeare, Lord Byron, et. al.
were every bit as interesting as my old high school english teacher said
they were. I liked it so much in fact that I took another literature
class instead of differential equations.
Ok, ok. So maybe I really didn't want to take DiffEq in the first place.
The whole point is I grew to appreciate literature in a way that I'm sure
my high school teacher wouldn't have believed possible.
--
Benny
Remove your rose colored glasses before e-mailing me
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Liz Albin Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2003 11:46 pm Post subject: Re: Computer Courses |
|
|
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 18:51:09 -0400, Edward Diener wrote:
| Quote: | why one should read Shakespeare instead of watching
wahtever was the at his local movie theatre or on his DVD player
|
Er, Shakespear should be seen rather than read, but otherwise I agree.
--
liz
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Edward Diener Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2003 11:59 pm Post subject: Re: Computer Courses |
|
|
Benny Hill wrote:
| Quote: | On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 18:51:09 -0400, Edward Diener wrote:
A student in an "advanced" high school English class which I was
teaching was telling me that movies were much more important than
literature, and he really couldn't see why he had to read literature
but his parents were making him take the advance course anyway. This
was an "advanced" student and he couldn't fathom why one should read
Shakespeare instead of watching wahtever was the at his local movie
theatre or on his DVD player. Imagine then what the "non-advanced"
students are like.
If it makes you feel any better Edward, I could easily have been that
advanced student. When I was in high school I had no desire to read
anything more challenging or meaningful than the latest sci-fi/fantasy
books from my favorite authors.
|
It's not so much the desire of that student or you which I am criticizing,
but the inability of educators to want to teach students any better and
enlighten them. In today's educational systems, whether high school,
college, or whatever, dumbing down knowledge into a mere utility for
"getting a job" and "making an easy life for oneself" is the purpose of
teaching, rather than one of knowledge and an understanding of the truths of
reality. I add the dumbing down of science, mathematics, history, geography
et al. to my experiences about the dumbing down of arts and literature.
| Quote: |
However, after taking a literature class in college (and possibly
growing up a little bit ) I realized that Shakespeare, Lord
Byron, et. al. were every bit as interesting as my old high school
english teacher said they were. I liked it so much in fact that I
took another literature class instead of differential equations.
Ok, ok. So maybe I really didn't want to take DiffEq in the first
place. The whole point is I grew to appreciate literature in a way
that I'm sure my high school teacher wouldn't have believed possible.
|
I am glad to hear that. But I think that fewer and fewer teachers, giving
the way educational systems are run today, will stand up for knowledge as a
means and an end itself to a happier and deeper understanding of life, as
opposed to the utilitarian purposes to which knowledge is being used and
taught today. That, in the long run, is very sad.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Edward Diener Guest
|
Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2003 12:28 am Post subject: Re: Computer Courses |
|
|
Liz Albin wrote:
| Quote: | On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 18:51:09 -0400, Edward Diener wrote:
why one should read Shakespeare instead of watching
wahtever was the at his local movie theatre or on his DVD player
Er, Shakespear should be seen rather than read, but otherwise I agree.
|
Shakespeare, although some writers previous to the 20th century would write
Shakespere, perhaps not incorrectly for their era's understanding of the
spelling.
I agree that Shakespeare's plays need to be seen as performed on the stage,
but often it takes the slowness of a reading to catch subtleties of language
and meaning which one does not understand during the performance of a play
because one doesn't have the time to take it all in. So I still prefer the
idea that one can read the plays for all their meanings and subtleties of
imagery, and also enjoy them as performed works.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Liz Albin Guest
|
Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2003 12:52 am Post subject: Re: Computer Courses |
|
|
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 20:28:49 -0400, Edward Diener wrote:
| Quote: | So I still prefer the
idea that one can read the plays for all their meanings and subtleties of
imagery, and also enjoy them as performed works.
|
I don't think one can, at least partly because the subtlety or artistry
only comes out on stage. Something like Henry V is a good
example. Iffy characterization, woeful politics and not much
poetry -- and yet -- well I've seen at least 5 different productions
of it, all of which worked.
--
liz
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Liz Albin Guest
|
Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2003 12:55 am Post subject: Re: Computer Courses |
|
|
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 20:52:56 -0400, Liz Albin wrote:
or in movies, but in performance
--
liz
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Edward Diener Guest
|
Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2003 1:17 am Post subject: Re: Computer Courses |
|
|
Liz Albin wrote:
| Quote: | On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 20:28:49 -0400, Edward Diener wrote:
So I still prefer the
idea that one can read the plays for all their meanings and
subtleties of imagery, and also enjoy them as performed works.
I don't think one can, at least partly because the subtlety or
artistry only comes out on stage. Something like Henry V is a good
example. Iffy characterization, woeful politics and not much
poetry -- and yet -- well I've seen at least 5 different productions
of it, all of which worked.
|
I couldn't disagree with you more.
Please trying reading "Henry V" again. Much of the poetry of it is
magnificent, and the wooing of Catherine by Henry is one of magnificent
imagery and subtlety and an absolute triumph of language, thought,
expression, passion, and love.
I think you are completely wrong also in your "Iffy characterization".
Falstaff, Henry himself, the many denizens of Falstaff's "gang" of
cutthroats and conmen. If this is truly "Iffy characterization" then all
literature is a sham since few, if any, other artists have ever created
anything better.
As far as woeful politics, Shakespeare didn't care about politics, he cared
about individual life. He wasn't interested in justifying the inavsion but
understanding the dramatic acts of its protagonists. Don't try to put
Shakespeare in the goody-goody school of current literary critical abortion.
He stands well outside that form of stupidity. Literature is interested in
truth, not moral simplicity.
I agree from one point of view that the politics are woeful, since the
English had little cause or reason to invade France, and Henry V drummed up
the cause mainly to further his own ambitions. But at least, in the play, he
went and fought and risked his life, and gave drama and meaning to his own
actions, whereas George II sits safely and watches others die for him and
the even greater wealth of his already rich friends.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Liz Albin Guest
|
Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2003 1:25 am Post subject: Re: Computer Courses |
|
|
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 21:17:05 -0400, Edward Diener wrote:
| Quote: | I couldn't disagree with you more.
Please trying reading "Henry V" again
|
I've read it within the past 3 years.
| Quote: | magnificent, and the wooing of Catherine by Henry is one of magnificent
imagery and subtlety and an absolute triumph of language, thought,
expression, passion, and love.
|
Er matter of taste. I'm afraid I must disagree here, as it was
precisely this of which I was thinking. Katharine is a generic bimbo,
and the courtship is only slightly more plausible than Richard's of
Anne Neville in Richard III.
| Quote: | I think you are completely wrong also in your "Iffy characterization".
Falstaff, Henry himself, the many denizens of Falstaff's "gang" of
cutthroats and conmen.
|
All of whom have diminished since Henry IV, although admittedly not to
the caricatured extent of Merry Wives.
| Quote: | As far as woeful politics, Shakespeare didn't care about politics, he cared
about individual life. He wasn't interested in justifying the inavsion but
understanding the dramatic acts of its protagonists.
|
No, "justifying" would imply he saw something wrong in the invasion)
?? There were no Georges on the English throne for another hundred
years, and none ever on the French.
--
liz
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JunkMail Guest
|
Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2003 1:29 am Post subject: Re: Computer Courses |
|
|
| Quote: | Soon popular music will be declared much more vital to people's
understanding than Mozart and Bach, and no doubt adverisements will be
declared more interesting than Rembrandt, Vermeer, and Monet.
|
One of the electives at the college I attend is modern music
I actually took that class. I found out it was music from the 1950's to
present day.
Problem is that most employers find 4 year degree better than 2 year tech
degree. The colleges require that you are a "well rounded" individual and
thus require you to take a bunch of electives. Most students just take the
easiest classes for there electives to get there GPA up which also looks
good on resumes since you would just list your GPA and not all the electives
you took.
I even took a power walking and jogging class for my personal wellness
elective. Can you imagine they even have badmitten (not sure on spelling).
Another thing I have noticed about the college that I attend is that every
semester someone comes into the class and asks the students to review the
professors job performance. Better reviews mean higher pay and a shot out
tenure. If a student is doing poorly in a class (getting a F, D, or C) they
usually give the professor a poor review. Since professors have incentives
to get better reviews I think they tend to give students higher grades then
they use to say 20 years ago when student reviews had no impact on
professors pay, tenure, etc.
just my 2 cents worth.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Benny Hill Guest
|
Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2003 1:49 am Post subject: Re: Computer Courses |
|
|
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 19:59:40 -0400, Edward Diener wrote:
| Quote: | It's not so much the desire of that student or you which I am criticizing,
but the inability of educators to want to teach students any better and
enlighten them.
|
Hi Edward,
I definitely wasn't taking that as a criticism of me. I too feel that
the whole American educational system is going down the drain. My
response to you was more to try and lift my own spirits than yours I'm
afraid.
My daughter turned 10 this week and I hate to think about what high
school is going to be like for her.
--
Benny
Remove your rose colored glasses before e-mailing me
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ed Mulroy [TeamB] Guest
|
Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2003 2:19 am Post subject: Re: Computer Courses |
|
|
What was your major? They sure didn't handle electives that way at
Villanova.
Each of us was assigned an "advisor". The electives you could take were
chosen from those which your advisor said you were allowed to take. For
instance, one of my electives was modeling potassium transport through nerve
walls. Another was using Kalman filtering and a state space model to
control a distillation process (with a "hybrid computer" - ever heard of one
of those)? Modern music would have been fun.
.. Ed
| Quote: | JunkMail wrote in message
news:3f909792$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Edward Diener Guest
|
Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2003 4:08 am Post subject: Re: Computer Courses |
|
|
Liz Albin wrote:
| Quote: | On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 21:17:05 -0400, Edward Diener wrote:
I couldn't disagree with you more.
Please trying reading "Henry V" again
I've read it within the past 3 years.
magnificent, and the wooing of Catherine by Henry is one of
magnificent imagery and subtlety and an absolute triumph of
language, thought, expression, passion, and love.
Er matter of taste. I'm afraid I must disagree here, as it was
precisely this of which I was thinking. Katharine is a generic bimbo,
and the courtship is only slightly more plausible than Richard's of
Anne Neville in Richard III.
I think you are completely wrong also in your "Iffy
characterization". Falstaff, Henry himself, the many denizens of
Falstaff's "gang" of cutthroats and conmen.
All of whom have diminished since Henry IV, although admittedly not to
the caricatured extent of Merry Wives.
As far as woeful politics, Shakespeare didn't care about politics,
he cared about individual life. He wasn't interested in justifying
the inavsion but understanding the dramatic acts of its protagonists.
No, "justifying" would imply he saw something wrong in the invasion)
|
Regarding all your comments, you are not thinking in terms of literature but
in terms of moral platitudes, by which you are forming your literary
judgments; "Katharine is a generic bimbo,". "the courtship is only slightly
more plausible...", "All of whom have diminished", "No, 'justifying' would
imply he saw something wrong in the invasion".
I do understand from your remarks why you think "subtlety or artistry only
comes out on stage", and I can only say, without meaning to sound
condescending or snobbish, that I am truly sorry that you see literary
artistry in such easy terms because it is far more complex than you appear
to believe.
| Quote: |
George II
?? There were no Georges on the English throne for another hundred
years, and none ever on the French.
|
The George II to which I was referring is currently on the American
"throne", and the situation to which I was referring is a personal one not a
political one.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Liz Albin Guest
|
Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2003 5:28 am Post subject: Re: Computer Courses |
|
|
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 00:08:40 -0400, Edward Diener wrote:
| Quote: | Regarding all your comments, you are not thinking in terms of literature but
in terms of moral platitudes, by which you are forming your literary
judgments; "Katharine is a generic bimbo,". "the courtship is only slightly
more plausible...", "All of whom have diminished", "No, 'justifying' would
imply he saw something wrong in the invasion".
|
Oh dear. Perhaps I should have elaborated. Katharine is not well
rounded or interesting (certainly not when compared to say --
Rosalind), and Henry's courtship of her is perfunctory. The richness of
characterisation of Falstaff, Pistole etc in Henry IV does diminsh (IMO
obviously) in Henry V and Merry Wives, but apparently we disagree
| Quote: | I do understand from your remarks why you think "subtlety or artistry only
comes out on stage", and I can only say, without meaning to sound
condescending or snobbish, that I am truly sorry that you see literary
artistry in such easy terms because it is far more complex than you appear
to believe.
|
This, btw, is not merely my philistine opinion, but is shared by a fair
number of teachers and actors. However, my distaste for Henry V
as poetry actually says very little about my sensibilities as a whole,
please don't generalize from a single example.
| Quote: | The George II to which I was referring is currently on the American
"throne",
|
I didn't want to jump to any conclusions. Thank you for clarifying.
--
liz
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|