| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Peter Herijgers Guest
|
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2004 12:43 pm Post subject: Re: Delphi 7 Updates |
|
|
To my knowledge only SP1 is available.
Peter.
"Godfrey" <none> wrote
| Quote: | Hi
What is the latest on D7 updates? Have the bugs been sorted. Can I
download and install?
Thanks
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steve Fuller Guest
|
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2004 3:25 pm Post subject: Re: Delphi 7 Updates |
|
|
Peter Herijgers wrote:
| Quote: | To my knowledge only SP1 is available.
Peter.
"Godfrey" <none> wrote
Hi
What is the latest on D7 updates? Have the bugs been sorted. Can I
download and install?
Thanks
|
I doubt there will be another patch. Instead a move to D9, when
available and at considerbale cost, will be the answer. D7 is the worst
Delphi release in terms of bugs (some unforgivable) since the diabolical
first version of D4. Remember the length of time it took to start your
app with integrated debugging turned on?
Steve
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Godfrey Guest
|
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2004 8:03 pm Post subject: Delphi 7 Updates |
|
|
Hi
What is the latest on D7 updates? Have the bugs been sorted. Can I
download and install?
Thanks
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Craig Stuntz [TeamB] Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paul Dolen Guest
|
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2004 8:57 pm Post subject: Re: Delphi 7 Updates |
|
|
The compiler optimizer was broken by 7.1 and no word on if they will
fix it.
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 13:03:39 -0700, "Godfrey" <none> wrote:
| Quote: | Hi
What is the latest on D7 updates? Have the bugs been sorted. Can I
download and install?
Thanks
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Craig Stuntz [TeamB] Guest
|
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 1:01 pm Post subject: Re: Delphi 7 Updates |
|
|
Paul Dolen wrote:
| Quote: | The compiler optimizer was broken by 7.1
|
Um, one specific bug was introduced. I think you're overstating the
problem.
-Craig
--
Craig Stuntz [TeamB] . Vertex Systems Corp. . Columbus, OH
Delphi/InterBase Weblog : http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz
Useful articles about InterBase development:
http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/category/21.aspx
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John O'Harrow Guest
|
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 5:15 pm Post subject: Re: Delphi 7 Updates |
|
|
"Craig Stuntz [TeamB]" <cstuntz (AT) nospam (DOT) please [a.k.a. vertexsoftware.com]>
wrote in message news:412201bf$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
| Quote: | Paul Dolen wrote:
The compiler optimizer was broken by 7.1
Um, one specific bug was introduced. I think you're overstating the
problem.
|
I don't believe Paul is overstating the problem at all. That "one specific
bug" affects EVERY compiled program.
regards,
John
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Craig Stuntz [TeamB] Guest
|
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 5:42 pm Post subject: Re: Delphi 7 Updates |
|
|
John O'Harrow wrote:
| Quote: | Um, one specific bug was introduced. I think you're overstating the
problem.
I don't believe Paul is overstating the problem at all. That "one
specific bug" affects EVERY compiled program.
|
You do understand the difference between "affecting every program" and
"no optimization," right? The optimizer does more than one task.
The effect on many programs from this case will be close to nothing.
On other apps, it's serious. Folks should look at the QC discussion
and see if it's applicable to their work.
-Craig
--
Craig Stuntz [TeamB] . Vertex Systems Corp. . Columbus, OH
Delphi/InterBase Weblog : http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paul Dolen Guest
|
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 8:54 pm Post subject: Re: Delphi 7 Updates |
|
|
| Quote: | You do understand the difference between "affecting every program" and
"no optimization," right? The optimizer does more than one task.
|
And you do understand that when someone says something is "broken"
they often do not mean 100% non-functional, but rather it generally
means at least part of its functionality is significantly impaired.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Craig Stuntz [TeamB] Guest
|
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 9:13 pm Post subject: Re: Delphi 7 Updates |
|
|
Paul Dolen wrote:
| Quote: | And you do understand that when someone says something is "broken"
they often do not mean 100% non-functional, but rather it generally
means at least part of its functionality is significantly impaired.
|
I think it's entirely fair to read a phrase like "the compiler
optimizer was broken by 7.1" as meaning it doesn't work at all. I
think it's *quite* unlikely that someone who is not familiar with the
issue would read that phrase as meaning "one specific defect which may
or may not affect your app was introduced into the optimizer." It is,
at the very least, vague, and I think misleading.
So don't complain too much when I clarify that there is only one
problem and it may not affect your apps at all. There is no need to
insist on vague terminology.
-Craig
--
Craig Stuntz [TeamB] . Vertex Systems Corp. . Columbus, OH
Delphi/InterBase Weblog : http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz
Everything You Need to Know About InterBase Character Sets:
http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/articles/403.aspx
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zedd Guest
|
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 6:21 am Post subject: Re: Delphi 7 Updates |
|
|
| Quote: | So don't complain too much when I clarify that there is only one
problem and it may not affect your apps at all.
|
Short of a program that does nothing, your programs _will_ be affected,
the only debatable point is if they will be affected in an obvious fashion,
but affected they will be.
What I find most irritating is your backhanded dismissal of what can
be a significant compiler optimization issue, and your acceptance that
Borland doing nothing about it isn't that bad.
Delphi Win32 isn't .Net or Java, poor compiler performance isn't a
customer expectation.
Z
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paul Dolen Guest
|
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 5:29 pm Post subject: Re: Delphi 7 Updates |
|
|
| Quote: | There is no need to insist on vague terminology.
|
My original post wasn't intended on being definitive "terminology".
It was more "conversational".
| Quote: | I think it's entirely fair to read a phrase like "the compiler
optimizer was broken by 7.1" as meaning it doesn't work at all. I
think it's *quite* unlikely that someone who is not familiar with the
issue would read that phrase as meaning "one specific defect which may
or may not affect your app was introduced into the optimizer."
|
Well, I would hope that most people would figure that if it was 100%
broken, there would be massive push to get it fixed. Basically, I
think you were reading more into my statement than anybody reasonably
would do so.
But, feel free to clarify the issue as much as you feel like it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nick Hodges [TeamB] Guest
|
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 5:33 pm Post subject: Re: Delphi 7 Updates |
|
|
Paul Dolen wrote:
| Quote: | Basically, I
think you were reading more into my statement than anybody reasonably
would do so.
|
Just as a side note -- having read these groups for going on ten years,
I can assure you that the above is /not/ true.
In other words, a simple statement like yours very easily and very
often turns into a newsgroup "meme".
--
Nick Hodges -- TeamB
Lemanix Corporation -- http://www.lemanix.com
Read my Blog -- http://www.lemanix.com/nick
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Craig Stuntz [TeamB] Guest
|
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 5:51 pm Post subject: Re: Delphi 7 Updates |
|
|
Paul Dolen wrote:
| Quote: | There is no need to insist on vague terminology.
My original post wasn't intended on being definitive "terminology".
It was more "conversational".
|
I agree; your original post did not. It was your reply, criticizing
me for clarifying, which insisted on being vague.
| Quote: | Basically, I
think you were reading more into my statement than anybody reasonably
would do so.
|
"Reasonable" does not always characterize how people read posts here,
sorry to say. I try to clarify when I see something which I consider
likely to be misinterpreted.
-Craig
--
Craig Stuntz [TeamB] . Vertex Systems Corp. . Columbus, OH
Delphi/InterBase Weblog : http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz
How to ask questions the smart way:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|