BorlandTalk.com Forum Index BorlandTalk.com
Borland discussion newsgroups
 
Archives   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Delphi Bugs
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 57, 58, 59  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BorlandTalk.com Forum Index -> Delphi Non-Technical
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Max
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 5:40 pm    Post subject: Delphi Bugs Reply with quote



Yesterday I have reported a freepascal bug. Today: its fixed! Bugs reported
to
qc are open since over a year! What is the reason that Borland does not fix
them?


Back to top
Jeff Overcash (TeamB)
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 5:44 pm    Post subject: Re: Delphi Bugs Reply with quote




"Max" <nospam (AT) nospam (DOT) com> wrote:
Quote:
Yesterday I have reported a freepascal bug. Today: its fixed! Bugs reported
to
qc are open since over a year! What is the reason that Borland does not fix
them?



Because Borland cares about doing little things like
regression testing which the freepascal people obviously don't
(or else have such a small set of regression tests as to make
them worthless).


Back to top
Craig Stuntz [TeamB]
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 5:49 pm    Post subject: Re: Delphi Bugs Reply with quote



Max wrote:

Quote:
Yesterday I have reported a freepascal bug. Today: its fixed! Bugs
reported to
qc are open since over a year!

That's so absurdly anecdotal as to be useless. Are you trying to
assert that FreePascal is more stable than Delphi's compiler? Because
if so, you aren't doing a very good job of it.

-Craig

--
Craig Stuntz [TeamB] . Vertex Systems Corp. . Columbus, OH
Delphi/InterBase Weblog : http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz
Want to help make Delphi and InterBase better? Use QC!
http://qc.borland.com -- Vote for important issues

Back to top
Max
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 8:51 pm    Post subject: Re: Delphi Bugs Reply with quote

Regression testing is a reason not to do it ????

"Jeff Overcash (TeamB)" <jeffovercash (AT) mindspring (DOT) com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:41054314$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
Quote:

"Max" <nospam (AT) nospam (DOT) com> wrote:
Yesterday I have reported a freepascal bug. Today: its fixed! Bugs
reported
to
qc are open since over a year! What is the reason that Borland does not
fix
them?



Because Borland cares about doing little things like
regression testing which the freepascal people obviously don't
(or else have such a small set of regression tests as to make
them worthless).




Back to top
Nick Hodges [TeamB]
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 8:56 pm    Post subject: Re: Delphi Bugs Reply with quote

Max wrote:

Quote:
Regression testing is a reason not to do it ????

Not doing proper regression testing is a reason not to use the fix.

In other words, what assurance to you have that the "fix" doens't break
existing code in insidious ways?

--
Nick Hodges -- TeamB
Lemanix Corporation -- http://www.lemanix.com
Read my Blog -- http://www.lemanix.com/nick

Back to top
Sanford Aranoff
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 9:02 pm    Post subject: Re: Delphi Bugs Reply with quote

"Craig Stuntz [TeamB]" wrote:

Quote:
Max wrote:

Yesterday I have reported a freepascal bug. Today: its fixed! Bugs
reported to
qc are open since over a year!

It is too hard for them to fix the bugs.

Maybe they should hire real programmers!



Back to top
Jeff Overcash (TeamB)
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 9:49 pm    Post subject: Re: Delphi Bugs Reply with quote


"Max" <nospam (AT) nospam (DOT) com> wrote:
Quote:
Regression testing is a reason not to do it ????

So how many things did the "fix" break? If you use FreePascal
I guess you don't have any clue. Borland doesn't jsut throw
things out at their customers, they make sure it goes through
a complete testing process to minimize the possibility of
breaking other code with a fix. This takes time, definitely
more than 24 hours in the case of Delphi.

If you don't want quality control then I guess the free pascal
method is for you, for most people they want some sort of QA
done on patches.

Back to top
Bob
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 1:33 am    Post subject: Re: Delphi Bugs Reply with quote

Quote:
That's so absurdly anecdotal as to be useless. Are you trying to
assert that FreePascal is more stable than Delphi's compiler? Because
if so, you aren't doing a very good job of it.

No, he was asserting that he had better "customer service" from the open
source product that he receives from Borland.

I can sympathise -- I was nailed last year by a language bug (TRY-FINALLY in
functions can wipe out the return value) that was basic to the very
definition of the language: I would consider a language bug to be of the
highest priority. Notwithstanding this, Borland has done nothing with it
so far (not even a caveat in the ReadMe documents).



Back to top
Nick Hodges [TeamB]
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 1:44 am    Post subject: Re: Delphi Bugs Reply with quote

Bob wrote:

Quote:
I was nailed last year by a language bug (TRY-FINALLY in
functions can wipe out the return value) that was basic to the very
definition of the language: I would consider a language bug to be of
the highest priority.

What's the QC number? I'd like to see that one in action.

--
Nick Hodges -- TeamB
Lemanix Corporation -- http://www.lemanix.com
Read my Blog -- http://www.lemanix.com/nick

Back to top
Bob Dawson
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 2:00 am    Post subject: Re: Delphi Bugs Reply with quote

"Bob" wrote
Quote:

[...] (TRY-FINALLY in
functions can wipe out the return value)

You have a piece of demo code for this? I use try finally a lot.

bobD



Back to top
Leonel
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 2:20 am    Post subject: Re: Delphi Bugs Reply with quote

Nick Hodges [TeamB] wrote:

Quote:
What's the QC number?

QC#3681

--
Leonel
http://www.techtips.com.br
"Any fool can write code that a computer can understand. Good
programmers write code that humans can understand." - Martin Fowler

Back to top
Leonel
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 2:21 am    Post subject: Re: Delphi Bugs Reply with quote

Bob wrote:

Quote:
Notwithstanding this, Borland has done nothing with it
so far (not even a caveat in the ReadMe documents).

Good news, it's been fixed in 7.1. Look at QC.

--
Leonel
http://www.techtips.com.br
"Any fool can write code that a computer can understand. Good
programmers write code that humans can understand." - Martin Fowler

Back to top
Bob
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 2:21 am    Post subject: Re: Delphi Bugs Reply with quote

Quote:
What's the QC number? I'd like to see that one in action.

http://qc.borland.com/wc/wc.exe/details?reportid=6590




Back to top
Nick Hodges [TeamB]
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 2:24 am    Post subject: Re: Delphi Bugs Reply with quote

Leonel wrote:

Quote:
QC#3681

Interestingly, it's marked fixed.

--
Nick Hodges -- TeamB
Lemanix Corporation -- http://www.lemanix.com
Read my Blog -- http://www.lemanix.com/nick

Back to top
Nick Hodges [TeamB]
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 2:24 am    Post subject: Re: Delphi Bugs Reply with quote

Bob wrote:

Quote:
http://qc.borland.com/wc/wc.exe/details?reportid=6590

Fixed in the D7 update, I gather.

--
Nick Hodges -- TeamB
Lemanix Corporation -- http://www.lemanix.com
Read my Blog -- http://www.lemanix.com/nick

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BorlandTalk.com Forum Index -> Delphi Non-Technical All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 57, 58, 59  Next
Page 1 of 59

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group
SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.