| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Max Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 5:40 pm Post subject: Delphi Bugs |
|
|
Yesterday I have reported a freepascal bug. Today: its fixed! Bugs reported
to
qc are open since over a year! What is the reason that Borland does not fix
them?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeff Overcash (TeamB) Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 5:44 pm Post subject: Re: Delphi Bugs |
|
|
"Max" <nospam (AT) nospam (DOT) com> wrote:
| Quote: | Yesterday I have reported a freepascal bug. Today: its fixed! Bugs reported
to
qc are open since over a year! What is the reason that Borland does not fix
them?
|
Because Borland cares about doing little things like
regression testing which the freepascal people obviously don't
(or else have such a small set of regression tests as to make
them worthless).
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Craig Stuntz [TeamB] Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 5:49 pm Post subject: Re: Delphi Bugs |
|
|
Max wrote:
| Quote: | Yesterday I have reported a freepascal bug. Today: its fixed! Bugs
reported to
qc are open since over a year!
|
That's so absurdly anecdotal as to be useless. Are you trying to
assert that FreePascal is more stable than Delphi's compiler? Because
if so, you aren't doing a very good job of it.
-Craig
--
Craig Stuntz [TeamB] . Vertex Systems Corp. . Columbus, OH
Delphi/InterBase Weblog : http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz
Want to help make Delphi and InterBase better? Use QC!
http://qc.borland.com -- Vote for important issues
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Max Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 8:51 pm Post subject: Re: Delphi Bugs |
|
|
Regression testing is a reason not to do it ????
"Jeff Overcash (TeamB)" <jeffovercash (AT) mindspring (DOT) com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:41054314$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
| Quote: |
"Max" <nospam (AT) nospam (DOT) com> wrote:
Yesterday I have reported a freepascal bug. Today: its fixed! Bugs
reported
to
qc are open since over a year! What is the reason that Borland does not
fix
them?
Because Borland cares about doing little things like
regression testing which the freepascal people obviously don't
(or else have such a small set of regression tests as to make
them worthless).
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nick Hodges [TeamB] Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 8:56 pm Post subject: Re: Delphi Bugs |
|
|
Max wrote:
| Quote: | Regression testing is a reason not to do it ????
|
Not doing proper regression testing is a reason not to use the fix.
In other words, what assurance to you have that the "fix" doens't break
existing code in insidious ways?
--
Nick Hodges -- TeamB
Lemanix Corporation -- http://www.lemanix.com
Read my Blog -- http://www.lemanix.com/nick
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sanford Aranoff Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 9:02 pm Post subject: Re: Delphi Bugs |
|
|
"Craig Stuntz [TeamB]" wrote:
| Quote: | Max wrote:
Yesterday I have reported a freepascal bug. Today: its fixed! Bugs
reported to
qc are open since over a year!
It is too hard for them to fix the bugs.
|
Maybe they should hire real programmers!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeff Overcash (TeamB) Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 9:49 pm Post subject: Re: Delphi Bugs |
|
|
"Max" <nospam (AT) nospam (DOT) com> wrote:
| Quote: | Regression testing is a reason not to do it ????
|
So how many things did the "fix" break? If you use FreePascal
I guess you don't have any clue. Borland doesn't jsut throw
things out at their customers, they make sure it goes through
a complete testing process to minimize the possibility of
breaking other code with a fix. This takes time, definitely
more than 24 hours in the case of Delphi.
If you don't want quality control then I guess the free pascal
method is for you, for most people they want some sort of QA
done on patches.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bob Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 1:33 am Post subject: Re: Delphi Bugs |
|
|
| Quote: | That's so absurdly anecdotal as to be useless. Are you trying to
assert that FreePascal is more stable than Delphi's compiler? Because
if so, you aren't doing a very good job of it.
|
No, he was asserting that he had better "customer service" from the open
source product that he receives from Borland.
I can sympathise -- I was nailed last year by a language bug (TRY-FINALLY in
functions can wipe out the return value) that was basic to the very
definition of the language: I would consider a language bug to be of the
highest priority. Notwithstanding this, Borland has done nothing with it
so far (not even a caveat in the ReadMe documents).
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nick Hodges [TeamB] Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 1:44 am Post subject: Re: Delphi Bugs |
|
|
Bob wrote:
| Quote: | I was nailed last year by a language bug (TRY-FINALLY in
functions can wipe out the return value) that was basic to the very
definition of the language: I would consider a language bug to be of
the highest priority.
|
What's the QC number? I'd like to see that one in action.
--
Nick Hodges -- TeamB
Lemanix Corporation -- http://www.lemanix.com
Read my Blog -- http://www.lemanix.com/nick
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bob Dawson Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 2:00 am Post subject: Re: Delphi Bugs |
|
|
"Bob" wrote
| Quote: |
[...] (TRY-FINALLY in
functions can wipe out the return value)
|
You have a piece of demo code for this? I use try finally a lot.
bobD
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Leonel Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 2:20 am Post subject: Re: Delphi Bugs |
|
|
Nick Hodges [TeamB] wrote:
| Quote: | What's the QC number?
|
QC#3681
--
Leonel
http://www.techtips.com.br
"Any fool can write code that a computer can understand. Good
programmers write code that humans can understand." - Martin Fowler
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Leonel Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 2:21 am Post subject: Re: Delphi Bugs |
|
|
Bob wrote:
| Quote: | Notwithstanding this, Borland has done nothing with it
so far (not even a caveat in the ReadMe documents).
|
Good news, it's been fixed in 7.1. Look at QC.
--
Leonel
http://www.techtips.com.br
"Any fool can write code that a computer can understand. Good
programmers write code that humans can understand." - Martin Fowler
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bob Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nick Hodges [TeamB] Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nick Hodges [TeamB] Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|