 |
BorlandTalk.com Borland discussion newsgroups
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Serge Dosyukov Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 6:35 pm Post subject: Delphi job market - observation |
|
|
Hi,
this is just personal observation in past two weeks:
recently I've got some certification as MCP and off course published this
information ;o)
in a past few weeks I've got about 5-10 calls for Delphi positions...
about half of them is a conversion of existing Delphi application to C#.
it is not just .Net conversion but to VS conversion.
there is no particular reason why people want to convert to C# other then
(so far...):
- no posibility to maintain application - very small market for
professionals in US (you can find many willing to come here, but not
currently available here)
- marketing push - people seems to be more convince in MS way of doing
things
- cost - for some reasons it is appear that it is smaller cost to do thing
in C# than it is in Delphi - this is a big surprise for me <8^)
- increasing demand on some markets for SMART and POCKET devices - hey, who
do not want to walk around warehouse with PDA ;O)
You will say that it is all known for years, but it looks link there is some
movements in a water here which are not yet clear
Now, backet for stones is on the left, but reality is rushing in a face ;O)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Craig Stuntz [TeamB] Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:13 pm Post subject: Re: Delphi job market - observation |
|
|
Serge Dosyukov wrote:
| Quote: | - increasing demand on some markets for SMART and POCKET devices -
hey, who do not want to walk around warehouse with PDA ;O)
|
That's why we did our first C# project. We might have used Delphi for
..NET if it had been released significantly earlier. We might still use
it later on. But of the reasons you give this is / was the most
compelling AFAICS.
--
Craig Stuntz [TeamB] . Vertex Systems Corp. . Columbus, OH
Delphi/InterBase Weblog : http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz
All the great TeamB service you've come to expect plus (New!)
Irish Tin Whistle tips: http://learningtowhistle.blogspot.com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Martin Waldenburg Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:22 pm Post subject: Re: Delphi job market - observation |
|
|
Serge Dosyukov wrote:
| Quote: | recently I've got some certification as MCP
|
a girl of nine years from pakistan got it too.
Martin
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Crazy Horse's crazier lit Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:26 pm Post subject: Re: Delphi job market - observation |
|
|
"Serge Dosyukov" <serge [AT] dragonsoftru [DoT] com> wrote
| Quote: |
recently I've got some certification as MCP and off course...
|
Militant C Police?
--
Download Blackbird Crow Raven's book
"STILL CASTING SHADOWS: Two American Families 1620-2006"
(.exe and .pdf): http://cc.borland.com/ccweb.exe/listing?id=23106
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Eric Schreiber Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 8:16 pm Post subject: Re: Delphi job market - observation |
|
|
Serge Dosyukov wrote:
| Quote: | - no posibility to maintain application - very small market for
professionals in US (you can find many willing to come here, but not
currently available here)
|
There's no question that the Delphi technical pool is smaller than for
some other languages. My own personal experience doesn't agree with the
'small market' theory though. I spent the last three years trying to
find a Delphi programming job in the Chicago area. Ads for available
positions were very few, and as I recall I went on only three
interviews that were Delphi specific. Third time was a charm :)
| Quote: | cost - for some reasons it is appear that it is smaller cost to do
thing in C# than it is in Delphi- this is a big surprise for me
|
This would be a suprise for me as well. Even if you allow that C#
programming is cheaper than Delphi programming (that sounds absurd to
me, but for the sake of argument...), surely it's much more expensive
to convert an existing Delphi app to C# than it is to maintain it in
Delphi.
| Quote: | increasing demand on some markets for SMART and POCKET devices - hey
who do not want to walk around warehouse with PDA
|
That one makes some sense to me, but if the recent movement with a
Delphi CF demo/beta is any indicator, that playing field will soon be
level again. I know when I pointed it out to my boss, he was *very*
interested, much more than I expected.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Richard Grossman Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:09 pm Post subject: Re: Delphi job market - observation |
|
|
The LA Delphi User Group recently received and announced a request for 2
Delphi programmers to work locally as W-2's fulltime at $120k/year and
there were no takers.
Maybe you should move to LA...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John Wester [Group W] Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:15 pm Post subject: Re: Delphi job market - observation |
|
|
In article <42e00eee$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com>, rgrossmanDELETE-THIS-
[email]PART (AT) techIII (DOT) com[/email] says...
| Quote: | The LA Delphi User Group recently received and announced a request for 2
Delphi programmers to work locally as W-2's fulltime at $120k/year and
there were no takers.
Maybe you should move to LA...
Or employers need to reconsider "no remote work". Call it "home- |
shoring" or "in-shoring". It's worth a thought. I've been working in one
of those relationships for quite sometime with a mininum of hiccups.
--
John
Life is complex. It has real and imaginary parts
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Atle Smelvær Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:32 pm Post subject: Re: Delphi job market - observation |
|
|
| Quote: | cost - for some reasons it is appear that it is smaller cost to do
thing in C# than it is in Delphi- this is a big surprise for me
This would be a suprise for me as well. Even if you allow that C#
programming is cheaper than Delphi programming (that sounds absurd to
me, but for the sake of argument...), surely it's much more expensive
to convert an existing Delphi app to C# than it is to maintain it in
Delphi.
|
Maybe Delphi developers cost more because there are few of them and they
know it. And maybe C# developers are cheap... :)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Matt Jacobs Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 11:05 pm Post subject: Re: Delphi job market - observation |
|
|
Richard Grossman <rgrossmanDELETE-THIS-PART (AT) techIII (DOT) com> wrote:
| Quote: | Maybe you should move to LA...
|
Why would you wish such a thing upon a person? ;-)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Larry Drews Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:39 am Post subject: Re: Delphi job market - observation |
|
|
"Atle Smelvær" <atle (AT) datagrafikk (DOT) no> wrote in news:42e01480
@newsgroups.borland.com:
| Quote: | cost - for some reasons it is appear that it is smaller cost to do
thing in C# than it is in Delphi- this is a big surprise for me
This would be a suprise for me as well. Even if you allow that C#
programming is cheaper than Delphi programming (that sounds absurd to
me, but for the sake of argument...), surely it's much more expensive
to convert an existing Delphi app to C# than it is to maintain it in
Delphi.
Maybe Delphi developers cost more because there are few of them and they
know it. And maybe C# developers are cheap... :)
|
Of course it could be because Delphi programmers are more productive than
C# programmers? No, it couldn't be that.<g>
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John Jacobson Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:42 am Post subject: Re: Delphi job market - observation |
|
|
"Crazy Horse's crazier little brother"
<cshannonKeinSpamBitteMitZuckerDrauf (AT) d4sw (DOT) com> wrote
| Quote: | Militant C Police?
|
Microsoft Certified Police?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wayne Niddery [TeamB] Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 2:14 am Post subject: Re: Delphi job market - observation |
|
|
John Wester [Group W] wrote:
| Quote: |
Or employers need to reconsider "no remote work". Call it "home-
shoring" or "in-shoring". It's worth a thought. I've been working in
one of those relationships for quite sometime with a mininum of
hiccups.
|
It will happen. I've been able to do most of my work from home. Most of my
customers are still local, but not all. I was doing some consulting for a
firm in L.A. and another in Calgary, another in Detroit. I expect this to
become much more common over the next couple of years.
--
Wayne Niddery - Logic Fundamentals, Inc. (www.logicfundamentals.com)
RADBooks: http://www.logicfundamentals.com/RADBooks.html
Those who disdain wealth as a worthy goal for an individual or a
society seem not to realize that wealth is the only thing that can
prevent poverty. - Thomas Sowell
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Erwien Saputra Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 2:58 am Post subject: Re: Delphi job market - observation |
|
|
Craig Stuntz [TeamB] wrote:
| Quote: |
That's why we did our first C# project. We might have used Delphi for
.NET if it had been released significantly earlier. We might still use
it later on. But of the reasons you give this is / was the most
compelling AFAICS.
|
Market is a hard thing to predict.
Borland kept on saying that their research told them that they were not
late in supporting .Net. People were shouting in this NG that they
needed .Net support.
It may be that people in this NG represented only a small fraction of
all Borland customer, but I got the impression that people in this NG
are impacted most by Borland's decision.
Same thing happen with Win64 support, several vocal people voiced their
concerns and the need is realized (Danny's interview on 24 hours of
Delphi). Unfortunately he said that he needs to convince some people
at Borland. I sure hope that they will not late with Win64 support.
I sure hope that whoever make decision at Borland asked the right
questions to the right people.....
Sometimes, I felt Borland is more reactive than proactive. Probably
they do proactive in some areas, unfortunately those areas do not
affect me. I have to mention that recently they are getting better in
communicating their direction.
Wien.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John Jacobson aka Captain Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 3:05 am Post subject: Re: Delphi job market - observation |
|
|
Serge Dosyukov <"serge [AT] dragonsoftru [DoT] com"> wrote in message
<42dfeae8$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com>
| Quote: | - no posibility to maintain application - very small market for
professionals in US (you can find many willing to come here, but not
currently available here)
|
Ah, the fallacy of the unused market, a very common economic fallacy. It
isn't the size of the market that determines one's welfare in selling/buying
in that market, it is the relationship of supply to demand. ( see my blog at
http://blogs.slcdug.org/jjacobson/archive/2005/02/07/FallacyUnusedMarket.aspx
).
| Quote: | - marketing push - people seems to be more convince in MS way of doing
things
|
Nothing new. This has always been true. I remember when the big contest was
between Borland C++ and Microsoft C++. There was once a time when Borland C++
was the most used development system in the world, then over time, MSFT won
the marketing game, part through the commonly held belief that their
development tools would always have an advantage over Borland's because MSFT
wrote the operating system. Businesses love to bet on MSFT against everyone
else because they idolize Bill Gates and want to hitch their wagon to a
"winner" like him.
Borland has survived for years and years despite this strong bias in favor of
MSFT, and through most of those years they did not have the hundreds of
millions of dollars in the bank they now have either.
| Quote: | - cost - for some reasons it is appear that it is smaller cost to do thing
in C# than it is in Delphi - this is a big surprise for me <8^)
|
This might be true for a lot of firms. Not because C# is a better language
than Delphi, but because you can find C# programmers cheaply who will work
for a pittance. The firm's business requirements might be simple enough that
they can staff their projects with beginners and mid-range programmers who
are eager to get more real-world experience in C#, whereas if they do it in
Delphi they face reduced supply at the entry and mid-range level because
these programmers tend to follow the herd in an attempt to further their own
careers.
| Quote: | - increasing demand on some markets for SMART and POCKET devices - hey, who
do not want to walk around warehouse with PDA ;O)
|
I bet this is a field that Borland thought it had covered with Java and C++.
Of course, now their Java tool has been Eclipsed, and their C++ tool is
awaiting resuscitation in DeXter. But this non-coverage is probably just a
temporary thing. All signs point toward Borland starting to do something
about this.
| Quote: |
You will say that it is all known for years, but it looks link there is some
movements in a water here which are not yet clear
|
Personally, I don't see anything particularly ominous stirring. Just as
developers are fickle enough to completely abandon the leading C++ tool in a
matter of a few short years, like they did with BC++, so too they are fickle
enough to return en masse to something else that Borland might offer. It all
depends on what the next CEO decides to do, because as we have seen from
Phillipe Kahn, Pizzaman and Dale, the strategies pursued by the guy at the
top can make all the difference in the world, in both getting good products
out the door and in attracting and keeping top talent.
If I thought there was a God I'd pray to Him to stick Philippe Kahn back in
the CEO slot at Borland, and then lure Anders Helsjberg back. That would be a
dream team. Corporate America would notice that, and the tech press would
hail it as a real coup.
But regardless of that I think things could be looking very good for Delphi
for the next few years, for several reasons: 1) the BDS is looking to be a
very good rival for VS once all the kinks are ironed out and the refactoring
gets bumped up. Hell, I like using D2005 more than D7 now, and this is the
first version of the BDS I actually had a chance to use (since I do Win32
programming). 2) JBuilder is no longer the top money maker, meaning Delphi
is Borland's prize bull once again. We should expect therefore that more
attention will be paid to Delphi than in the past several years. If Delphi
can then progress at the rate JBuilder progressed, we should see it easily
pose a formidable challenge to MSFT hegemony in the Windows development world
in a few short years. 3) Delphi is absorbing other languages at Borland,
like C# and C++, which greatly expands its appeal and likely appeal in the
future. In the past, Borland had concentrated its multi-operating-system
strategies in C++ and Java, but now it looks like Delphi would be the ideal
vehicle for those strategies (especially with C++ coming on board).
--
Everything in this post is mere opinion.
It might be very well formed opinion based
on an uncanny grasp of the facts, but it
remains opinion nevertheless.
Here's where you'll find Absolute Truth:
http://blogs.slcdug.org/jjacobson/
Posted with Reader3000-BETA 0.9.4.1007
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Angra Mainyu Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:48 am Post subject: Re: Delphi job market - observation |
|
|
"John Jacobson aka Captain Jake"wrote
| Quote: | Serge Dosyukov wrote
- cost - for some reasons it is appear that it is smaller cost to do thing
in C# than it is in Delphi - this is a big surprise for me <8^)
This might be true for a lot of firms. Not because C# is a better language
than Delphi, but because you can find C# programmers cheaply who will work
for a pittance. The firm's business requirements might be simple enough that
they can staff their projects with beginners and mid-range programmers who
are eager to get more real-world experience in C#, whereas if they do it in
Delphi they face reduced supply at the entry and mid-range level because
these programmers tend to follow the herd in an attempt to further their own
careers.
|
Capt'n - I gotta say, "What a load of unadulterated BS"!
IMO Serge is making the point that many (no not those in the Delphi world) say
that development in C# aka .NET in managed code environment is more efficient
thus costs less than Delphi. Now there are a couple of things to consider about
the Delphi side of that statement, does he mean Delphi Win32 or Delphi for .NET.
If he means Delphi Win32 we could argue forever over technical reasons why
people increasingly choose C# aka .NET over tools like Delphi Win32. If he means
the language Delphi for .NET vs C# then I for one can't make a case for why
Delphi the language is markedly efficiently superior to C#.
The reason I slammed you was that instead of even attempting to argue the
technical merits of the comparison you immediately dove to the bottom to
demonize and berate C# programmers as a herd of desperate incompetents willing
to work for a pittance. And then do the same for why there seems to be a
shortage of highly competent Delphi programmers. And yes I do recognize that we
are discussing this in a very partisan NG and my argument falls on ears deafened
by the loud applause for your POV, nevertheless Shame on you!
| Quote: | If I thought there was a God I'd pray to Him to stick Philippe Kahn back in
the CEO slot at Borland, and then lure Anders Helsjberg back. That would be a
dream team. Corporate America would notice that, and the tech press would
hail it as a real coup.
|
Yeah, when pigs fly.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|