| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Shane Stump Guest
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 9:38 pm Post subject: Linker Error #1659 AGAIN! |
|
|
If I could only get Borland to pay me for all the down time from linker
errors, I could probably have a HOBBY <BG>!
I am getting the dreaded Linker Error #1659 and don't have a clue how to
resolve it (I have tried rebuilding and even including rebuilding my
package and I get the same error).
The latest linker I have for C Builder 6 is version 5.64.
I just went to their registered user download area and I don't see a
newer version. Is there a newer version? If so, how can I get it?
Best Regards,
Shane |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shane Stump Guest
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 9:47 pm Post subject: Re: Linker Error #1659 AGAIN! |
|
|
I was just reading that there is a version 5.66 version of the linker
that supposively fixes the problem I am having.
As I mentioned earlier, 5.66 version of the linker has been removed from
the download area (registered user).
Could someone please email it to me @
ShaneATStumpWare.com
?
Best Regards,
Shane |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
David Dean [CodeGear] Guest
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 10:38 pm Post subject: Re: Linker Error #1659 AGAIN! |
|
|
In article <4649e41c$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com>,
Shane Stump <ShaneATStumpWare.com> wrote:
| Quote: | As I mentioned earlier, 5.66 version of the linker has been removed from
the download area (registered user).
|
I don't know why this happened, but I'll try to get it fixed. In the
meantime, you can put in an install case with support here:
<http://support.codegear.com/install>
--
-David Dean
CodeGear C++ QA Engineer
<http://blogs.codegear.com/ddean/> |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shane Stump Guest
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 11:17 pm Post subject: Re: Linker Error #1659 AGAIN! |
|
|
David Dean [CodeGear] wrote:
| Quote: | In article <4649e41c$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com>,
Shane Stump <ShaneATStumpWare.com> wrote:
As I mentioned earlier, 5.66 version of the linker has been removed from
the download area (registered user).
I don't know why this happened, but I'll try to get it fixed. In the
meantime, you can put in an install case with support here:
http://support.codegear.com/install
|
Is there a QUICK way to get the latest linker?
Best Regards,
Shane |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
David Dean [CodeGear] Guest
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 2:29 am Post subject: Re: Linker Error #1659 AGAIN! |
|
|
In article <4649f91d (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com>,
Shane Stump <ShaneATStumpWare.com> wrote:
| Quote: | Is there a QUICK way to get the latest linker?
|
Support should be quick... The request to update the web page was
already sent out, so that should happen soon as well.
--
-David Dean
CodeGear C++ QA Engineer
<http://blogs.codegear.com/ddean/> |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vavan Guest
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 8:10 am Post subject: Re: Linker Error #1659 AGAIN! |
|
|
On Tue, 15 May 2007 11:38:29 -0500, Shane Stump <ShaneATStumpWare.com>
wrote:
| Quote: | If I could only get Borland to pay me for all the down time from linker
errors, I could probably have a HOBBY <BG>!
|
and I wonder why people keep themself under ilink torture instead of
going with... well, you know the answer :)
--
Vladimir Ulchenko aka vavan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shane Stump Guest
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 4:38 pm Post subject: Re: Linker Error #1659 AGAIN! |
|
|
vavan wrote:
| Quote: | On Tue, 15 May 2007 11:38:29 -0500, Shane Stump <ShaneATStumpWare.com
wrote:
If I could only get Borland to pay me for all the down time from linker
errors, I could probably have a HOBBY <BG>!
and I wonder why people keep themself under ilink torture instead of
going with... well, you know the answer :)
|
I use a lot of third party components unfortunately and everytime I have
ever tried ilink, it completes about several of the libraries which
leaves me dead in the water.
I am now in the process of installing the upgrade of BDS 2006 I have had
sitting on my desk for 18 months but it isn't going to be "pain-free"
either because of a couple of the components I use a lot and I am going
to have to hope the author responses with a "fixed" version or pay
someone to fix for me.
Best regards,
Shane |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|