BorlandTalk.com

Valence · Guest

The following code results in an Access Violation in BCB 5,
and BCB 6 has internal compile error F1001.

//---------------------------------------------------------------------------
struct My_Struct { // this was done since the borland bug had no
workaround
union {
unsigned __int64 a64;
struct {
unsigned __int64 b:8; //8 bits
unsigned __int64 c:1; //1 bit
unsigned __int64 d:1; //1 bit
unsigned __int64 e:1; //1 bit
unsigned __int64 f:1; //1 bit
unsigned __int64 g:1; //1 bit
unsigned __int64 h:1; //1 bit
unsigned __int64 i:1; //1 bit
unsigned __int64 j:3; //3 bits
unsigned __int64 k:2; //2 bits
unsigned __int64 l:1; //1 bit
unsigned __int64 m:10; //10 bits
unsigned __int64 n:10; //10 bits
unsigned __int64 o:5; //5 bits
unsigned __int64 p:2; //2 bits
};
};
};
//---------------------------------------------------------------------------
void __fastcall TForm1::Button9Click(TObject *Sender) {
My_Struct cm;
__int64 a = 1;
cm.b=a; //8 bits
cm.c=a; //1 bit
cm.d=a; //1 bit
cm.e=a; //1 bit
cm.f=a; //1 bit
cm.g=a; //1 bit
cm.h=a; //1 bit
cm.i=a; //1 bit
cm.j=a; //3 bits
cm.k=a; //2 bits
cm.l=a; //1 bit
cm.m=a; //10 bits
cm.n=a; //10 bits
cm.o=a; //5 bits
cm.p=a; //2 bits
}

Andrue Cope [TeamB] · Guest

Valence wrote:

Valence · Guest

"Andrue Cope [TeamB]" <no.spam (AT) not (DOT) a.valid.address> wrote

Remy Lebeau (TeamB) · Guest

"Valence" <notrust (AT) nobody (DOT) com> wrote