 |
BorlandTalk.com Borland discussion newsgroups
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
John Herbster Guest
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 12:05 pm Post subject: Is it time for a Delphi algorithms group? |
|
|
Is it time for a Delphi algorithms group, yet?
(Thanks for your consideration -- JohnH)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Charles Appel Guest
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 12:21 pm Post subject: Re: Is it time for a Delphi algorithms group? |
|
|
"John Herbster" <herb-sci1_AT_sbcglobal.net> wrote
| Quote: |
Is it time for a Delphi algorithms group, yet?
|
Sounds like a good idea.
--
Charles Appel
"A generation which ignores history has no past - and no future."
Robert Anson Heinlein
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark Vaughan Guest
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 12:54 pm Post subject: Re: Is it time for a Delphi algorithms group? |
|
|
"John Herbster" <herb-sci1_AT_sbcglobal.net> wrote in news:41bd85a0
@newsgroups.borland.com:
| Quote: | Is it time for a Delphi algorithms group, yet?
|
yes, definitely!
--
Mark Vaughan
___________
Visit the Numerical Methods in Pascal web page at
http://www-rab.larc.nasa.gov/nmp/fNMPhome.htm
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John Herbster Guest
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 1:08 pm Post subject: Re: Is it time for a Delphi algorithms group? |
|
|
| Quote: | Is it time for a Delphi algorithms group, yet?
|
Read here for some previous discussion on the subject:
[url]http://groups-beta.google.com/groups?as_q=algorithms+delphi&as_epq=&as_oq=group+forum&as_eq=FAQ&as_ugroup=borland.*[/url]
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lucian.R Guest
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 1:33 pm Post subject: Re: Is it time for a Delphi algorithms group? |
|
|
It seems to me a little melodramatic. Isn't it?
May be we talk about a extension of the actual algorithms, or may be about a
future version of them...or may be I'm wrong, I believe we're still
depending on them.
Rgds,
Lucian R.
"Charles Appel" <charlesappel (AT) mindspring (DOT) com> wrote
| Quote: | "John Herbster" <herb-sci1_AT_sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:41bd85a0 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
Is it time for a Delphi algorithms group, yet?
Sounds like a good idea.
--
Charles Appel
"A generation which ignores history has no past - and no future."
Robert Anson Heinlein
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lucian.R Guest
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 1:35 pm Post subject: Re: Is it time for a Delphi algorithms group? |
|
|
ops..sorry, I have understood very wrong the question sorry guys. Next
time I'll pay more attention.
Sorry.
Rgds,
Lucian R
"Lucian.R" <rlucian (AT) easynet (DOT) ro> wrote
| Quote: | It seems to me a little melodramatic. Isn't it?
May be we talk about a extension of the actual algorithms, or may be about
a
future version of them...or may be I'm wrong, I believe we're still
depending on them.
Rgds,
Lucian R.
"Charles Appel" <charlesappel (AT) mindspring (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:41bd892b (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
"John Herbster" <herb-sci1_AT_sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:41bd85a0 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
Is it time for a Delphi algorithms group, yet?
Sounds like a good idea.
--
Charles Appel
"A generation which ignores history has no past - and no future."
Robert Anson Heinlein
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alisdair Meredith [TeamB] Guest
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 2:15 pm Post subject: Re: Is it time for a Delphi algorithms group? |
|
|
John Herbster wrote:
| Quote: | Is it time for a Delphi algorithms group, yet?
|
<takes off TeamB hat>
Creating new groups is never as easy as it seems, for all sorts of
reasons, so I'm definitely *not* wading in with a TeamB hat here <g>
But I'm going to answer your question with another:
Why a *Delphi* algorithms group? What is so special about the
algorithms you are thinking of that they might only be implemented in
Delphi?
At their heart, algorithms are an expression of a way of finding a
result, language issues are an implementation detail.
While I am not sure a Delphi algorithms group would generate enough
traffic, I would be very interested in a general group for algorithms,
where language specific implementation details were not off topic, but
also not the main traffic in the group either.
Of course the same could be said for OO, patterns, GUIs, ...
This is one (of many) reason creating new groups is hard, balancing
their interest to get sufficient-but-not-overwhelming traffic.
AlisdairM
<dons TeamB hat again>
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Charles Appel Guest
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 2:33 pm Post subject: Re: Is it time for a Delphi algorithms group? |
|
|
"Alisdair Meredith [TeamB]"
<alisdair.NO.SPAM.PLEASE.meredith (AT) uk (DOT) renaultf1.com> wrote
| Quote: | John Herbster wrote:
Is it time for a Delphi algorithms group, yet?
takes off TeamB hat
Creating new groups is never as easy as it seems, for all sorts of
reasons, so I'm definitely *not* wading in with a TeamB hat here
But I'm going to answer your question with another:
Why a *Delphi* algorithms group? What is so special about the
algorithms you are thinking of that they might only be implemented in
Delphi?
|
The problem is that it is often hard to find code in Delphi - where it
is easy to find the same algorithm in C/C++ or BASIC.
| Quote: | At their heart, algorithms are an expression of a way of finding a
result, language issues are an implementation detail.
|
True, but that detail can be quite a problem. Translating C/C++
to Delphi is not always the easiest of tasks - especially if you
have never studied C or haven't used it in ten years or more.
Translating BASIC is generally easier, but this still requires that
you have at least a working knowledge of BASIC.
| Quote: | While I am not sure a Delphi algorithms group would generate enough
traffic, I would be very interested in a general group for algorithms,
where language specific implementation details were not off topic, but
also not the main traffic in the group either.
|
Perhaps. But I'd still rather have the Delphi group.
--
Charles Appel
"A generation which ignores history has no past - and no future."
Robert Anson Heinlein
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Charles Appel Guest
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 2:38 pm Post subject: Re: Is it time for a Delphi algorithms group? |
|
|
"Ben Hochstrasser" <bhoc@tiscali123^H^H^H.ch> wrote
| Quote: | John Herbster wrote:
Is it time for a Delphi algorithms group, yet?
Basically it's a good idea. OTOH if the posts expire too fast it will be
of
limited use.
|
True. That could be a problem. A possible solution would be to grant
blanket permission to post the algorithms from the group to personal
Delphi web sites. Periodically, a list of sites could be posted in the
group.
--
Charles Appel
"A generation which ignores history has no past - and no future."
Robert Anson Heinlein
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Martin James Guest
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 2:58 pm Post subject: Re: Is it time for a Delphi algorithms group? |
|
|
A couple weeks ago, I was looking for Btree algorithm examples. The ones I
found were C-based, ie. actually written in C, or in C-style Pascal, ie p^,
s^, q^, AKA unfollowable spag.
Also, all the examples were based around records and pointers. Not a class
or object in sight.
Rgds,
Martin
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marcus F. Guest
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 3:49 pm Post subject: Re: Is it time for a Delphi algorithms group? |
|
|
"John Herbster" <herb-sci1_AT_sbcglobal.net> wrote
| Quote: | Is it time for a Delphi algorithms group, yet?
|
What kind? Graphics? WinAPI related? Database? OO? General programming?...
Wait a second, aren't there newsgroups for these already?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John Jacobson Guest
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 3:53 pm Post subject: Re: Is it time for a Delphi algorithms group? |
|
|
"John Herbster" <herb-sci1_AT_sbcglobal.net> wrote
| Quote: |
Is it time for a Delphi algorithms group, yet?
|
YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
YES!!!!!!!!!1
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rene Tschaggelar Guest
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 4:50 pm Post subject: Re: Is it time for a Delphi algorithms group? |
|
|
Ben Hochstrasser wrote:
| Quote: | John Herbster wrote:
Is it time for a Delphi algorithms group, yet?
Basically it's a good idea. OTOH if the posts expire too fast it will
be of limited use.
Same for a "Frequently addressed problems" group, eg with the
infamous "how can I start another process and wait until it's
finished" and other often- encountered problems.
|
Ben,
Time to start running a news tool such as Xananews
to gather the news 365x24x7. No ?
Lets see, I have 87k messages just from delphi.non-tech
here. Xananews becomes a memory hog over the years then,
as it wants to have something in RAM.
Rene
--
Ing.Buro R.Tschaggelar http://www.ibrtses.com
Your newsgroups @ http://www.talkto.net
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rene Tschaggelar Guest
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 4:54 pm Post subject: Re: Is it time for a Delphi algorithms group? |
|
|
Martin James wrote:
| Quote: | A couple weeks ago, I was looking for Btree algorithm examples. The
ones I found were C-based, ie. actually written in C, or in C-style
Pascal, ie p^, s^, q^, AKA unfollowable spag.
Also, all the examples were based around records and pointers. Not a
class or object in sight.
|
You havent looked on my pages then.
With records though, I believe.
Rene
--
Ing.Buro R.Tschaggelar http://www.ibrtses.com
Your newsgroups @ http://www.talkto.net
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Peter Morris [Air Softwar Guest
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 5:08 pm Post subject: Re: Is it time for a Delphi algorithms group? |
|
|
Sounds like a good idea, but don't people tend to post those in the OO group
anyway? They just add OOP to them and call them "patterns" :-)
--
Pete
====
Audio compression components, DIB graphics controls, FastStrings
http://www.droopyeyes.com
Read or write articles on just about anything
http://www.HowToDoThings.com
My blog
http://blogs.slcdug.org/petermorris/
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|