| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Guero sin Fe Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 8:03 pm Post subject: Native code still fastest |
|
|
It seems that even Microsoft consider that Native code is superior to .NET
managed, then why upgrade for GUI programming? i
I love my delphi 5 enterprise!.
http://www.grimes.demon.co.uk/dotnet/vistaAndDotnet.htm |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John Herbster Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 9:03 pm Post subject: Re: Native code still fastest |
|
|
"David Smith" <nowhere (AT) nowhere (DOT) com> wrote
| Quote: | ... Delphi 2006 is so much better development environment for GUI
programming? And for that matter, any kind of programming.
|
Any kind? Even
(1) Mathematical modeling and optimizers?
(2) FEA or PDE solvers?
(3) Programming for embedded computer systems?
(4) PIC programming?
Hmm, JohnH |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
David Smith Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 9:03 pm Post subject: Re: Native code still fastest |
|
|
Guero sin Fe kirjoitti:
| Quote: | managed, then why upgrade for GUI programming? i
I love my delphi 5 enterprise!.
|
Because, Delphi 2006 is so much better development environment for GUI
programming? And for that matter, any kind of programming.
David S. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
David Smith Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 10:03 pm Post subject: Re: Native code still fastest |
|
|
John Herbster kirjoitti:
| Quote: | " Tom Corey" <omtay.oreycay (AT) otmailhay (DOT) omcay> wrote
Language barrier. I think the OP was asking
"Why upgrade from Delphi 5 to Delphi 2006".
Yes, of course!
That is why I thought that the phrase
"any kind of programming"
was too broad. --JohnH
|
I'm glad that thing sorted out while I was watching TV ;-)
But I do think that Delphi compiler should be made better (optimizations
etc.), so you could use for more purposes.
David S. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John Herbster Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 10:03 pm Post subject: Re: Native code still fastest |
|
|
" Tom Corey" <omtay.oreycay (AT) otmailhay (DOT) omcay> wrote
| Quote: | Language barrier. I think the OP was asking
"Why upgrade from Delphi 5 to Delphi 2006".
|
Yes, of course!
That is why I thought that the phrase
"any kind of programming"
was too broad. --JohnH |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tom Corey Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 10:03 pm Post subject: Re: Native code still fastest |
|
|
John Herbster wrote:
| Quote: | ... Delphi 2006 is so much better development environment for GUI
programming? And for that matter, any kind of programming.
Any kind? Even
(1) Mathematical modeling and optimizers?
(2) FEA or PDE solvers?
(3) Programming for embedded computer systems?
(4) PIC programming?
Hmm, JohnH
|
Language barrier. I think the OP was asking "Why upgrade from Delphi 5
to Delphi 2006". If that is correct, then I think David's answer is
correct. If Delphi 5 could do it, Delphi 2006 can do it better. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roby DP Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:03 pm Post subject: Re: Native code still fastest |
|
|
| Quote: | Guero sin Fe wrote:
It seems that even Microsoft consider that Native code is superior to
.NET managed, then why upgrade for GUI programming?
I downloaded an application called "paint.net" today and I'm pleasantly
surprised by its speed.
|
Hi,
I sure you, try D2006+GraphicEx+GR32... it blow away in the trash
paint.net.
Massive operations as hue, rotation etc.. 10x faster with delphi...
;) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Arthur Hoornweg Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:03 pm Post subject: Re: Native code still fastest |
|
|
Guero sin Fe wrote:
| Quote: | It seems that even Microsoft consider that Native code is superior to .NET
managed, then why upgrade for GUI programming?
|
I downloaded an application called "paint.net" today and I'm pleasantly
surprised by its speed.
It's a .NET 2.0 based graphical application that supports layers. The kind
of application one would think managed code isn't suitable for.
I suspect the installer pre-compiles the whole thing, there's no delay
at all when I start it. But heck, when it's pre-compiled, it's native
code, isn't it?
--
Arthur Hoornweg
(In order to reply per e-mail, please just remove the ".net"
from my e-mail address. Leave the rest of the address intact
including the "antispam" part. I had to take this measure to
counteract unsollicited mail.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ben Hochstrasser Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:03 pm Post subject: Re: Native code still fastest |
|
|
John Herbster wrote:
| Quote: | Which reminds me that one of my neighbors is doing
another kind of "programming" for the televising of the
"March Madness" basketball tournaments.
|
Oh, the infamous TVCR class? Ugly code, really.
--
Ben |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John Herbster Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:03 pm Post subject: Re: Native code still fastest |
|
|
| Quote: | Which reminds me that one of my neighbors is doing
another kind of "programming" for the televising of the
"March Madness" basketball tournaments.
Oh, the infamous TVCR class? Ugly code, really.
|
No! She is the one who tells the commentators when to talk,
what to say, and when to stop talking, so that every thing seems
to flow together smoothly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ben Hochstrasser Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:03 pm Post subject: Re: Native code still fastest |
|
|
John Herbster wrote:
| Quote: | No! She is the one who tells the commentators when to talk,
what to say, and when to stop talking, so that every thing seems
to flow together smoothly.
|
She should get a job as Mr. Ballmer's assis^H^H^H^H^Hcounsellor. :)
--
Ben |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dave Nottage [TeamB] Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:03 pm Post subject: Re: Native code still fastest |
|
|
Arthur Hoornweg wrote:
| Quote: | I downloaded an application called "paint.net" today and I'm
pleasantly surprised by its speed.
|
FWIW, I'm not pleasantly surprised by its speed. The effects seem to be
slow (compared with native apps I've used).
I'm also bothered by the flickering that occurs in the tool windows
when using the menu.
Other than that, my initial impression is that it is a nice app <g>
--
Dave Nottage [TeamB]
Have questions?: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Want answers?: http://support.borland.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John Herbster Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:03 pm Post subject: Re: Native code still fastest |
|
|
| Quote: | "any kind of programming"
I'm glad that thing sorted out while I was watching TV
|
Which reminds me that one of my neighbors is doing
another kind of "programming" for the televising of the
"March Madness" basketball tournaments. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ben Hochstrasser Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:03 pm Post subject: Re: Native code still fastest |
|
|
David Smith wrote:
| Quote: | But I do think that Delphi compiler should be made better (optimizations
etc.), so you could use for more purposes.
|
Yep. I hate it when I have to intersperse sleep() calls every so often
because my apps are too fast. ;-)
--
Ben |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dan Barclay Guest
|
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:05 am Post subject: Re: Native code still fastest |
|
|
"Ben Hochstrasser" <bhoc@tiscali123^H^H^H.ch> wrote in message
news:Xns9788E8099489Bbhoc (AT) 207 (DOT) 105.83.66...
| Quote: | David Smith wrote:
But I do think that Delphi compiler should be made better (optimizations
etc.), so you could use for more purposes.
Yep. I hate it when I have to intersperse sleep() calls every so often
because my apps are too fast.
|
A loop works, and it makes it look like your app is *doing* something<vbg>.
Just don't forget:
{$Optimization Off}
Otherwise you may be disappointed in your loop timing<g>
Dan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|