BorlandTalk.com Forum Index BorlandTalk.com
Borland discussion newsgroups
 
Archives   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

.NET and performance

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BorlandTalk.com Forum Index -> Delphi Non-Technical
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Holger Flick
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 2:56 pm    Post subject: .NET and performance Reply with quote



Hi people,

we had the discussion about .NET being slow and that you have to get a
"good" PC system. Okay, I am getting a new one, however, processor
speed and disk speed is everything, I guess. As well as a modest amount
of memory (as Donkey would put it Smile )

I have two questions and I'd like to get your two cents about it:

- will .NET take advantage of a two-CPU system when compiling the
machine code?

- my design for the PC system has 1 GB memory. Will more memory make
sense for .NET speed during development of db apps?

Any thoughts are appreciated.

--
Holger
Back to top
Alessandro Federici
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 3:57 pm    Post subject: Re: .NET and performance Reply with quote



"Holger Flick" <rammbaer (AT) xyz (DOT) gmx.de> wrote

Quote:
[..] however, processor speed and disk speed is everything, I guess. As
well as a modest amount
of memory (as Donkey would put it Smile )

Not really. You can waste a lot of power with a crappy motherboard and/or
memory.
In my experience those plus a good set of disks is what makes the real
difference.

Quote:
- will .NET take advantage of a two-CPU system when compiling the
machine code?

AFAIK the GC will benefit from it

Quote:
- my design for the PC system has 1 GB memory. Will more memory make
sense for .NET speed during development of db apps?

It all depends on the type of apps you write. For end user app, 1Gb is more
than plenty. For server apps (even Win32) with a lot of concurrency, Oracle
<G>, etc. 2Gb might be better. Still, since memory is so cheap these days,
why not get 2 and be done with it? ;-)

My 2c,
Alessandro Federici



Back to top
TSool
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 4:32 pm    Post subject: Re: .NET and performance Reply with quote



Hi A.,

I will tell you why it is a problem: most motherboards come with 3
slots. But all memory management is based on dual routines... So I
either take two 512 or two 1 GB. Difference is: 2 GB is four-times as
expensive!!!


Thanx for your comments! They are really helpful!
--
Holger
Quote:
"Holger Flick" <rammbaer (AT) xyz (DOT) gmx.de> wrote in message
news:41051ba9 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
[..] however, processor speed and disk speed is everything, I guess.
As
well as a modest amount
of memory (as Donkey would put it Smile )

Not really. You can waste a lot of power with a crappy motherboard
and/or
memory.
In my experience those plus a good set of disks is what makes the real
difference.

- will .NET take advantage of a two-CPU system when compiling the
machine code?

AFAIK the GC will benefit from it

- my design for the PC system has 1 GB memory. Will more memory make
sense for .NET speed during development of db apps?

It all depends on the type of apps you write. For end user app, 1Gb is
more
than plenty. For server apps (even Win32) with a lot of concurrency,
Oracle
G>, etc. 2Gb might be better. Still, since memory is so cheap these
days,
why not get 2 and be done with it? ;-)

My 2c,
Alessandro Federici






--- posted by geoForum on http://delphi.newswhat.com

Back to top
Jackie Martling
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 5:06 pm    Post subject: Re: .NET and performance Reply with quote

"TSool" <rammbaer (AT) nospam (DOT) pls.gmx.de> wrote

Quote:
Hi A.,

I will tell you why it is a problem: most motherboards come with 3
slots. But all memory management is based on dual routines... So I
either take two 512 or two 1 GB. Difference is: 2 GB is four-times as
expensive!!!

Newer dual channel memory motherboards will always come with an even number
of slots and most of those come with 4. 512MB of Kingston DDR400 only costs
$84.00. Get 1GB and try it out, if you need more then get more.



Back to top
Alessandro Federici
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 3:23 am    Post subject: Re: .NET and performance Reply with quote

"TSool" <rammbaer (AT) nospam (DOT) pls.gmx.de> wrote

[..]
Quote:
I will tell you why it is a problem: most motherboards come with 3
slots.

??? Not where I live ;-)



Back to top
Holger Flick
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 8:04 am    Post subject: Re: .NET and performance Reply with quote

Hi again,

I contacted my vendor again and he explained the situation in detail to
me. I wan t a AMD Athlon64 and the thing is that most boards are with 3
slots. Maybe I should have told you which CPU needs I have. If you can
afford an Opteron it's no problem to get 4 slots, you're right.

--
Holger

Alessandro Federici wrote:

Quote:
"TSool" <rammbaer (AT) nospam (DOT) pls.gmx.de> wrote in message
news:41053239$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
[..]
I will tell you why it is a problem: most motherboards come with 3
slots.

??? Not where I live Wink


Back to top
John Evenosky
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 1:29 pm    Post subject: Re: .NET and performance Reply with quote

In article <41075e1e (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com>, [email]rammbaer (AT) xyz (DOT) gmx.de[/email]
says...
Quote:
Hi again,

I contacted my vendor again and he explained the situation in detail to
me. I wan t a AMD Athlon64 and the thing is that most boards are with 3
slots. Maybe I should have told you which CPU needs I have. If you can
afford an Opteron it's no problem to get 4 slots, you're right.

--
Hi Holger,


Checkout the Socket 939 motherboards. They seem to all have 4 DIMM
slots and they support the Athlon 64 and Ahtlon 64 FX processors.

Back to top
William Meyer
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 3:50 pm    Post subject: Re: .NET and performance Reply with quote

On 07/28/04, Holger Flick said:

Quote:
I contacted my vendor again and he explained the situation in detail
to me. I wan t a AMD Athlon64 and the thing is that most boards are
with 3 slots. Maybe I should have told you which CPU needs I have. If
you can afford an Opteron it's no problem to get 4 slots, you're
right.

I see pretty good prices on Opteron, and have been very happy with the
Tyan K8S (S2850) motherboard, which has six slots -- a vanishing breed.

--
Bill
--------

"I cannot under-take to lay my finger on that article in the
Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on the
object of benevolence, the money of their constituents." -- James
Madison

Back to top
William Meyer
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 3:51 pm    Post subject: Re: .NET and performance Reply with quote

On 07/28/04, William Meyer said:

Quote:
I see pretty good prices on Opteron, and have been very happy with the
Tyan K8S (S2850) motherboard, which has six slots -- a vanishing
breed.

Sorry, I was thinking PCI slots. But the K8S does have 4 DIMM slots,
too.

--
Bill
--------

"I cannot under-take to lay my finger on that article in the
Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on the
object of benevolence, the money of their constituents." -- James
Madison

Back to top
Brion L. Webster
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 7:58 pm    Post subject: Re: .NET and performance Reply with quote

William Meyer wrote:

Quote:
Sorry, I was thinking PCI slots. But the K8S does have 4 DIMM
slots, too.

Ah, but how many IDE slots does it have?

-Brion

Back to top
William Meyer
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 9:01 pm    Post subject: Re: .NET and performance Reply with quote

On 07/28/04, Brion L. Webster said:

Quote:
Ah, but how many IDE slots does it have?

4 IDE, 4 DIMM, 4 SATA, 2 GbE, 6PCI

http://tyan.com/products/html/tomcatk8s.html

--
Bill
--------

"I cannot under-take to lay my finger on that article in the
Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on the
object of benevolence, the money of their constituents." -- James
Madison

Back to top
Brion L. Webster
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 10:15 pm    Post subject: Re: .NET and performance Reply with quote

William Meyer wrote:

Quote:
On 07/28/04, Brion L. Webster said:

Ah, but how many IDE slots does it have?

4 IDE, 4 DIMM, 4 SATA, 2 GbE, 6PCI

http://tyan.com/products/html/tomcatk8s.html

Oh, in my feeble attempt to ask a funny, I typed the wrong acronym.
That should have been "how many ISA slots", or even "how many EISA
slots". Since it's a Tyan board, I knew better than to ask "how
many MicroChannel", although I did love those boards.

http://kb.indiana.edu/data/acae.html

Besides - isn't that 4 IDE channels, not slots? <g>

-Brion


Back to top
William Meyer
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 10:44 pm    Post subject: Re: .NET and performance Reply with quote

On 07/28/04, Brion L. Webster said:

Quote:
Oh, in my feeble attempt to ask a funny, I typed the wrong acronym.

Oh well, I wasn't sure if you were being funny...

Quote:
That should have been "how many ISA slots", or even "how many EISA
slots". Since it's a Tyan board, I knew better than to ask "how
many MicroChannel", although I did love those boards.

I have to say, I never did...

Quote:
Besides - isn't that 4 IDE channels, not slots? <g

Uh huh, but on these groups, you tend to get chewed up for correcting
people about nearly anything!
--
Bill
--------

"I cannot under-take to lay my finger on that article in the
Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on the
object of benevolence, the money of their constituents." -- James
Madison

Back to top
Danny Thorpe
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 7:36 am    Post subject: Re: .NET and performance Reply with quote

Holger Flick wrote:

Quote:

- will .NET take advantage of a two-CPU system when compiling the
machine code?


No. The JIT compiler is not multi-threaded.

Quote:
- my design for the PC system has 1 GB memory. Will more memory make
sense for .NET speed during development of db apps?


Describe an application which would be degraded by having more
available RAM? ;>

-Danny

--
Delphi Compiler Core: http://homepages.borland.com/dthorpe/blog/delphi/

Back to top
William Meyer
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 5:28 pm    Post subject: Re: .NET and performance Reply with quote

On 08/18/04, Danny Thorpe said:

Quote:
Describe an application which would be degraded by having more
available RAM? ;

Exhaustive pattern testing? <g>

--
Bill
--------

"Reaching into one's own pocket to assist his fellow man is noble and
worthy of praise. Reaching into another person's pocket to assist one's
fellow man is despicable and worthy of condemnation." -- Walter E.
Williams

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BorlandTalk.com Forum Index -> Delphi Non-Technical All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group
SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.