BorlandTalk.com Forum Index BorlandTalk.com
Borland discussion newsgroups
 
Archives   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Net Masters SMTP

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BorlandTalk.com Forum Index -> C++ Builder (Internet Socket)
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Colin B Maharaj
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 10:38 am    Post subject: Net Masters SMTP Reply with quote



Hi all, I am using BCB6.Ent's SMTP components to send mail and
attachments. So far everything looks good and works fine. Is there any
short comings that I should be aware of that can be an issue in the
future. I previously used BCB3.Pro NMSMTP but it was really buggy and
hard to get working.

By the way, better late than never, happy new year to all, and thanks
again for providing me with timely and relevant advice and assistance.
There are a lot of things that I just could not get going without the
assistance of this group. May Borland and this group live 1000 years.
Back to top
Remy Lebeau (TeamB)
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 6:38 pm    Post subject: Re: Net Masters SMTP Reply with quote




"Colin B Maharaj" <noreply (AT) myhost (DOT) com> wrote


Quote:
Hi all, I am using BCB6.Ent's SMTP components to send mail and
attachments.


You are using a third-party component. TNMSMTP is not a Borland component.

Quote:
So far everything looks good and works fine.

Consider yourself lucky then.

Quote:
Is there any short comings that I should be aware of that can
be an issue in the future.

Asside from being several years outdated, the Netmaster components are also
notoriously buggy and problematic. I strongly suggest that you not use
them.

Quote:
I previously used BCB3.Pro NMSMTP but it was really buggy
and hard to get working.

The same is still true.


Gambit



Back to top
Colin B Maharaj
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 1:41 am    Post subject: Re: Net Masters SMTP Reply with quote




Quote:

Asside from being several years outdated, the Netmaster components are also
notoriously buggy and problematic. I strongly suggest that you not use
them.



So maybe I should use Indy9?

Back to top
Remy Lebeau (TeamB)
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 7:55 am    Post subject: Re: Net Masters SMTP Reply with quote


"Colin B Maharaj" <noreply (AT) myhost (DOT) com> wrote


Quote:
So maybe I should use Indy9?

That is one of many options available to you.


Gambit



Back to top
PAPA
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 12:28 am    Post subject: Re: Net Masters SMTP Reply with quote

I've been using the NetMasters SMTP for over a year on my monitor server. I
have not had any problems sending mail.
"Remy Lebeau (TeamB)" <no.spam (AT) no (DOT) spam.com> wrote

Quote:

"Colin B Maharaj" <noreply (AT) myhost (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:43ce19d7$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...

Hi all, I am using BCB6.Ent's SMTP components to send mail and
attachments.

You are using a third-party component. TNMSMTP is not a Borland
component.

So far everything looks good and works fine.

Consider yourself lucky then.

Is there any short comings that I should be aware of that can
be an issue in the future.

Asside from being several years outdated, the Netmaster components are
also
notoriously buggy and problematic. I strongly suggest that you not use
them.

I previously used BCB3.Pro NMSMTP but it was really buggy
and hard to get working.

The same is still true.


Gambit





Back to top
Mark Jacobs
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 4:11 pm    Post subject: Re: Net Masters SMTP Reply with quote

Colin B Maharaj wrote:
Quote:
Hi all, I am using BCB6.Ent's SMTP components to send mail and
attachments. So far everything looks good and works fine. Is there any
short comings that I should be aware of that can be an issue in the
future. I previously used BCB3.Pro NMSMTP but it was really buggy and
hard to get working.

By the way, better late than never, happy new year to all, and thanks
again for providing me with timely and relevant advice and assistance.
There are a lot of things that I just could not get going without the
assistance of this group. May Borland and this group live 1000 years.

I got so fed up with TNMPOP3 crashing when retrieving certain emails, I wrote my own POP3
client around the TClientSocket component and a simple POP3 guide. It was easy, and the
app I have now never crashes, whatever email I retrieve. Any ideas how to decode attached
files - is there a free BCB5 Pro VCL component out there to decode base64, UTF-8, UTF-7,
and BinHex (Mac) attachments?

--
Mark Jacobs
http://www.dkcomputing.co.uk

Back to top
Remy Lebeau (TeamB)
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 6:02 pm    Post subject: Re: Net Masters SMTP Reply with quote


"Mark Jacobs" <markj (AT) critical (DOT) co.uk> wrote


Quote:
Any ideas how to decode attached files - is there a free BCB5
Pro VCL component out there to decode base64, UTF-8,
UTF-7, and BinHex (Mac) attachments?

Have a look at Indy ([url]http://www.indyproject.org)[/url], ICS
([url]http://www.overbyte.be)[/url], or Synapse ([url]http://www.ararat.cz/synapse)[/url]. They
handle all of that stuff for you, and a lot more. Email formats are
increasingly complex to parse manually nowadays.


Gambit



Back to top
Hans Galema
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2006 9:42 am    Post subject: Re: Net Masters SMTP Reply with quote

Remy Lebeau (TeamB) wrote:

Quote:
Email formats are
increasingly complex to parse manually nowadays.

Do you mean the multipart/mixed with parts that themselves
are multipart/alternative and so ?

If you have an example of what you consider a complex email (.eml),
could you please post it as attachment in the attachments group ?

The most complex I can think of is a html mail with several attachments
of files in different format.

Hans.

Back to top
Remy Lebeau (TeamB)
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2006 7:20 pm    Post subject: Re: Net Masters SMTP Reply with quote


"Hans Galema" <notused (AT) notused (DOT) nl> wrote


Quote:
Do you mean the multipart/mixed with parts that
themselves are multipart/alternative and so ?

Yes. Message parts can be nested several levels deep, and even contain
other embedded messages that have their own parts.

Quote:
If you have an example of what you consider a complex email
(.eml), could you please post it as attachment in the attachments group ?

You can read the following article for an example:

HTML Messages
http://www.indyproject.org/Sockets/Blogs/RLebeau/2005_08_17_A.en.iwp

Quote:
The most complex I can think of is a html mail with several
attachments of files in different format.

Have you ever seen TNEF-encoded messages from MSOutlook? The entire message
(including attachments) is encoded as a single binary attachment that is
then nested inside a multipart message. When received, you have to parse
the MIME to get the TNEF attachment and then parse the binary data to
extract the original headers, body, and attachments.


Gambit



Back to top
Hans Galema
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 8:28 pm    Post subject: Re: Net Masters SMTP Reply with quote

Remy Lebeau (TeamB) wrote:

Quote:
Yes. Message parts can be nested several levels deep, and even contain
other embedded messages that have their own parts.

Yes. I have seen that. Take the part between two boundaries and handle
that recursive.

Quote:
You can read the following article for an example:

HTML Messages
http://www.indyproject.org/Sockets/Blogs/RLebeau/2005_08_17_A.en.iwp

Looking a few minutes in it it gave already a lot of usefull info. As I am
in the process of decoding a mail in its parts a complex mail as example
would still be interesting.

Quote:
Have you ever seen TNEF-encoded messages from MSOutlook? The entire message
(including attachments) is encoded as a single binary attachment that is
then nested inside a multipart message. When received, you have to parse
the MIME to get the TNEF attachment

That is as usual then.

Quote:
and then parse the binary data to
extract the original headers, body, and attachments.

No. I have never heard of TNEF. Such an .eml mail as example would be nice.
Is Outlook Express capable of sending such mails too ?

Will google for TNEF soon.

Thanks for the info.

Hans.

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BorlandTalk.com Forum Index -> C++ Builder (Internet Socket) All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group
SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.