| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
John O'Harrow
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dennis
Guest
|
 Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 1:17 pm Post subject: Re: New Fastcode CompareText B&V Tool |
 |
|
Hi John
A problem with version numbering.
Your version is 1.20
The latest version is 1.10 not 1.1 and the version by you should be 1.11.
Best regards
Dennis Kjaer Christensen
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
John O'Harrow
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 1:37 pm Post subject: Re: New Fastcode CompareText B&V Tool |
|
|
"Dennis" <marianndkc (AT) home3 (DOT) gvdnet.dk> wrote
| Quote: | Hi John
A problem with version numbering.
Your version is 1.20
The latest version is 1.10 not 1.1 and the version by you should be 1.11.
|
I was planning to adopt a policy of using the first digit after the decimal
point as an indicator that the main B&V code had been updated and using the
second digit for minor changes to the B&V tool, such as the addition of new
challenge functions.
regards,
John
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dennis
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 1:44 pm Post subject: Re: New Fastcode CompareText B&V Tool |
|
|
Hi John
OK
You just wanted to introduce new conventions without asking the rest of the
community about their opinion?
Best regards
Dennis Kjaer Christensen
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
John O'Harrow
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 2:01 pm Post subject: Re: New Fastcode CompareText B&V Tool |
|
|
"Dennis" <marianndkc (AT) home3 (DOT) gvdnet.dk> wrote
| Quote: | Hi John
OK
You just wanted to introduce new conventions without asking the rest of
the
community about their opinion?
|
As long as the version number increases with each release, the actual number
used is irrelevant. I choose to do it this way for convenience, but if
there are major objections I will change this.
My interpretation of the version numbering convention is that digits to the
left of the point are for major functional changes, the first digit after
the point is for significant changes, and the second digit is for minor
changes.
regards,
John
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dennis
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 7:30 am Post subject: Re: New Fastcode CompareText B&V Tool |
|
|
Hi John
I actually agree that is a good convention.
I would however like the format to be
Major.Minor.Release.Build
This is what is supported in Delphi
Best regards
Dennis Kjaer Christensen
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dennis
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 7:31 am Post subject: Re: New Fastcode CompareText B&V Tool |
|
|
Hi John
| Quote: | As long as the version number increases with each release, the actual
number
used is irrelevant. I choose to do it this way for convenience, but if
|
I do not agree.
If you released 4.3 followed by 4.5 then I would wonder where 4.4 was.
Regards
Dennis
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
