BorlandTalk.com Forum Index BorlandTalk.com
Borland discussion newsgroups
 
Archives   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

PlannedWeek++

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BorlandTalk.com Forum Index -> C++ Builder (Non-Technical)
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Saulo I. Regis
Guest





PostPosted: Fri May 21, 2004 1:23 pm    Post subject: PlannedWeek++ Reply with quote



Since last Friday each Friday adds a week delay to the "planned" release
date of the announced upcoming Open Letter!

This will be true until such Open Letter will be published!

Just to remember!

Today is the first iteration of PlannedWeek++

Saulo


Back to top
Peter Agricola
Guest





PostPosted: Fri May 21, 2004 5:28 pm    Post subject: Re: PlannedWeek++ Reply with quote




"Saulo I. Regis" wrote:
Quote:
Since last Friday each Friday adds a week delay to the "planned" release
date of the announced upcoming Open Letter!

This will be true until such Open Letter will be published!

Just to remember!

Today is the first iteration of PlannedWeek++


++PlannedWeek is more effiecient. I'm not sure the difference is noticeable.


Peter



Back to top
Saulo I. Regis
Guest





PostPosted: Fri May 21, 2004 5:28 pm    Post subject: Re: PlannedWeek++ Reply with quote



Hi Peter,

Quote:
++PlannedWeek is more effiecient. I'm not sure the difference is
noticeable.


Same thing! No sign of the Open Letter while iterating!

I was also thinking that may be "PlannedWeekDelay" could be a better name!

Saulo



Back to top
Boian Mitov
Guest





PostPosted: Fri May 21, 2004 7:14 pm    Post subject: Re: PlannedWeek++ Reply with quote

Check to see if there is a breakpoint placed there. It could be also
a debugger introduced delay. Try to compile the Borland.bpr without
debug information. You can also check if you have BCB DesperatePatch 4
installed. Try also to change the "Build with runtime OpenLetters"
Project Option. As a last resort, try to compile with a third party
OpenLetter. Also check if the OpenLetter.src and the OpenLetter.legal
header file are in sync. Some delays are due to inefficient *.legal
header file. Move some of the .legal functionality into the .src file.
This way the Borland will not have to compile the .legal file each time
it is included. Also try to put "#pragma legalstop" each place you use
the .legal file. This will result into generating a single one time
precompiled legal file for each of the files using it.
If nothing else works, roll back your clock, and pretend that the
OpanLetter-Day has not arrived. It usually fools the time sensitive
applications.
Please let us know, if it works for you. If it does not, we can try
burring our heads into the sand as alternative approach, however it
results in some other body parts sticking up high.
With best regards,
Boian Mitov

Saulo I. Regis wrote:
Quote:

Same thing! No sign of the Open Letter while iterating!



Back to top
Dave Jewell
Guest





PostPosted: Fri May 21, 2004 9:53 pm    Post subject: Re: PlannedWeek++ Reply with quote

"Saulo I. Regis" <saulo (AT) password (DOT) info> wrote


Quote:
Today is the first iteration of PlannedWeek++

PlannedWeek++ is old hat. What you need is PlannedWeek#. It doesn't have
"pointers" to fictitious open letters, but you can be sure that everything
is properly "managed". Moreover, all "garbage" found in these newsgroups
will be rigorously collected.... :-)

Dave




Back to top
DS
Guest





PostPosted: Fri May 21, 2004 10:14 pm    Post subject: Re: PlannedWeek++ Reply with quote

Dave Jewell wrote:
Quote:
PlannedWeek++ is old hat. What you need is PlannedWeek#. It doesn't have
"pointers" to fictitious open letters, but you can be sure that everything
is properly "managed". Moreover, all "garbage" found in these newsgroups
will be rigorously collected.... :-)

ROFLMAO!!!


LP,
Dejan


Back to top
Sebastian Ledesma
Guest





PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2004 9:09 pm    Post subject: Re: ++m_ulPlannedWeek [Was: Re: PlannedWeek++] Reply with quote

I think we should re-code:

m_ulPlannedWeek = m_ulPlannedWeek <<1;


"Graham Reeds" <grahamr (AT) omnieng (DOT) co.uk> escribió en el mensaje
news:40b1ba62$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
Quote:
G.





Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BorlandTalk.com Forum Index -> C++ Builder (Non-Technical) All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group
SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.