 |
BorlandTalk.com Borland discussion newsgroups
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Ignacio Vazquez Guest
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2003 2:47 pm Post subject: Re: Poor performance with SCSI vs IDE |
|
|
Avi wrote:
| Quote: | The result of all my performance tests is as follows:
|
With what drives?
--
Cheers,
Ignacio
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Avi Guest
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2003 3:27 pm Post subject: Poor performance with SCSI vs IDE |
|
|
Hi all,
I use Dual Xeon machine with 1GB Ram
SCSI 320 Ultra from Adaptec (and also tried LSI logic)
SQL Server 2000 sp 3a
Windows 2000 sp4
script with 33000 commands (about half of them inserts)
The result of all my performance tests is as follows:
· With the current configuration IDE disk give much better performance than
SCSI (40 seconds compared to 3.30 minutes)
· The faster the SCSI controller the slower the performance. In other words,
writing to the disk on old Motorola box was faster than the Dual CPU Xeon.
· SCSI 320 Ultra with RAID configuration gave good result (50 seconds).
(automatic disk catching?)
· If all the SQL commands are done in one transaction also the fast SCSI
(without RAID) finished in 30 seconds. However, this is not our regular
behavior and was done just to better understand our problem.
· Changing the SCSI controller (and drivers) did not improve performance.
· Benchmark utilities showed that the SCSI reads and writes are much faster
than their IDE counterpart.
· Both Sybase and SQL Server gave poor performance with SCSI
Is there something to configure that I'm missing
Avi
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|