 |
BorlandTalk.com Borland discussion newsgroups
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Johannes Bjerregaard Guest
|
Posted: Tue Mar 28, 2006 6:03 pm Post subject: QC problems being ignored |
|
|
I realize that QC is not dead, but there are problems out there that
seem to be forgotten. Here is one that has 6 votes, and was posted over
2 months ago. It appears that the QC elves keep circling around it.
http://qc.borland.com/wc/qcmain.aspx?d=24056
There have been a couple of discussions on b.p.d.webservices.wsdl about
this problem recently, but no action. I'm wondering if there are areas
that are not being covered by said elves.
-- |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Johannes Bjerregaard Guest
|
Posted: Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:03 pm Post subject: Re: QC problems being ignored |
|
|
TObject wrote:
| Quote: |
"Johannes Bjerregaard" <jozzb@hotmail> wrote in message
news:442977c7$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
I realize that QC is not dead, but there are problems out there that
seem to be forgotten. Here is one that has 6 votes, and was posted
over 2 months ago...
Two months? Get in line, pal, I have reports that have been ignored
for over two years.
|
I do too, but they are not showstoppers with several votes.
-- |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
David Dean Guest
|
Posted: Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:03 pm Post subject: Re: QC problems being ignored |
|
|
In article <442977c7$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com>,
"Johannes Bjerregaard" <jozzb@hotmail> wrote:
| Quote: | I'm wondering if there are areas
that are not being covered by said elves.
|
I expect that there are areas where the sysops have little or no
experience, and would rather see someone with more experience in that
area open the report.
--
-David
Nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TObject Guest
|
Posted: Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:03 pm Post subject: Re: QC problems being ignored |
|
|
"Johannes Bjerregaard" <jozzb@hotmail> wrote in message news:442977c7$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
| Quote: | I realize that QC is not dead, but there are problems out there that
seem to be forgotten. Here is one that has 6 votes, and was posted over
2 months ago...
|
Two months? Get in line, pal, I have reports that have been ignored
for over two years. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TObject Guest
|
Posted: Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:03 pm Post subject: Re: QC problems being ignored |
|
|
"Johannes Bjerregaard" <jozzb@hotmail> wrote in message news:442981c7$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
| Quote: | I do too, but they are not showstoppers with several votes.
|
It's ok to ignore them, then. [Sarcastic remark] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris Burrows Guest
|
Posted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 12:03 am Post subject: Re: QC problems being ignored |
|
|
"TObject" <newsgroupreader (AT) pronografics (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:44297d65$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
| Quote: |
"Johannes Bjerregaard" <jozzb@hotmail> wrote in message
news:442977c7$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
I realize that QC is not dead, but there are problems out there that
seem to be forgotten. Here is one that has 6 votes, and was posted over
2 months ago...
Two months? Get in line, pal, I have reports that have been ignored
for over two years.
|
This might be the best thing that comes out of the proposed Delphi sale. If
I was a prospective DevCo, during the technical 'due diligence' process I
would be getting technical experts to ask some very searching questions. e.g
how / why there are so many outstanding bugs in the system, how serious they
are, why it has not been possible to attend to them so far (too difficult,
too costly, don't know how to fix it?), the costs involved in fixing them,
the risks involved in leaving them unattended etc etc.
The status of the data in QC would be a serious obstruction to a possible
sale, or at least, may reduce the price that Borland can realistically ask
for it.
--
Chris Burrows
CFB Software
http://www.cfbsoftware.com/gpcp |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rick Carter Guest
|
Posted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 1:03 am Post subject: Re: QC problems being ignored |
|
|
| Quote: | This might be the best thing that comes out of the proposed Delphi sale.
If
I was a prospective DevCo, during the technical 'due diligence' process
I
would be getting technical experts to ask some very searching questions.
e.g
how / why there are so many outstanding bugs in the system, how serious
they
are, why it has not been possible to attend to them so far (too
difficult,
too costly, don't know how to fix it?), the costs involved in fixing
them,
the risks involved in leaving them unattended etc etc.
The status of the data in QC would be a serious obstruction to a
possible
sale, or at least, may reduce the price that Borland can realistically
ask
for it.
|
Which is why I think the Delphi team, and even their PHBs, realize that
it's important that both new development and QA/QC proceed at the present
time; they can't afford to go into a "holding pattern" or take a "wait
and see" attitude.
And, contrary to the rant that started this thread, I think QC is giving
the Delphi team the statistics to show that QA/QC and responsiveness to
the need for bug fixes has never been better, though it may still fall
short of our expectations. I hope the bug mentioned makes it into SP2,
even though it's a part of Delphi that I don't work with, because I
realize how important it is to at least some of us.
Rick Carter
carterrk (AT) despammed (DOT) com
Chair, Delphi/Paradox SIG, Cincinnati PC Users Group
--- posted by geoForum on http://delphi.newswhat.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Johannes Bjerregaard Guest
|
Posted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 4:03 am Post subject: Re: QC problems being ignored |
|
|
Rick Carter wrote:
| Quote: | And, contrary to the rant that started this thread, I think QC is
giving the Delphi team the statistics to show that QA/QC and
|
I hope you weren't referring to my original post as a rant. I was
trying to point out the apparently unbalanced attention that is given
to different QC items, and give the powers that be a chance to take a
look at how they can ensure that important issues are opened in a
timely fashion.
-- |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mikael Eriksson Guest
|
Posted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 10:03 am Post subject: Re: QC problems being ignored |
|
|
Johannes Bjerregaard wrote:
Here is one that has 6 votes
Hi.
The number of votes does not seem to be a reason to open a report or not.
I have managed to gather 43 votes to QC26063.
It is just a couple of weeks old so it is perhaps not ripe enough to be
opened. :)
More likely there are not enough sysops who targets the SOAP issues.
A sysop (as far as I know) verifies and opens reports in there own spare
time so who can blame a sysop for not doing his "job" when I want them
to do it.
Perhaps Borland should take a bigger responsibility in QC areas where
there are not so many active syops?
/Micke |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|