BorlandTalk.com Forum Index BorlandTalk.com
Borland discussion newsgroups
 
Archives   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Re: BCB ALTERNATIVES AND MIGRATION PATH
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BorlandTalk.com Forum Index -> C++ Builder (Non-Technical)
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Des O'Toole
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:59 am    Post subject: Re: BCB ALTERNATIVES AND MIGRATION PATH Reply with quote



Hi Rodrigo

We're both in the same boat, and share the same outlook.

I've also been forced to evaluate all the migration options and the only
other thing I'm hoping for is that more 3rd party vendors produce pure .Net
versions of their components (as Developer Express have), rather than
VCL.NET versions. At least this way, a migration to C++ VS.NET may not be as
painful.

In the meantime we're restructuring a lot of our code so that we don't use
VCL components directly. Instead we use a core subset of highly customised
derivatives. Hopefully this will make it easier if we then have to switch to
..NET, or any other environment. For instance, rather than worrying about a
thousand TForms, we will only have to concentrate on adapting WinForms to
provide our core, standardised behaviour. As well as hopefully easing
migration this is also paying dividends in standardising the look and feel
of our user interface and making the code much cleaner.

But still, fingers crossed for a new BCB.

Des

"Rodrigo Gómez" <rgomez (AT) tsradio (DOT) com.mx> wrote

Quote:
To everyone:
Even if Borland say anything positive about future developments regarding
BCB (officially) would you trust them to commit to it in the future after
the way we have been treated in the past?

There are not much options really. For me, I'm willing to forget and
forgive Borland as long as they bring something good to the BCB world
again. BCB is such a great tool, and I have sooooo much time, money and
experience invested here, that changing this to another framework/language
will be too expensive, and improductive, if possible at all. I know it
might not be a wise decision to continue with Borland after the lack of a
clear path, but me business depends on the products I already have, and I
have to continue supporting and creating new features for them for the
next 5-10 years maybe (I still have one of my 3 big apps in BCB4!!!), so a
fixed IDE and up to date VCL will be a great help, even if it's the last
one.

I'm trying to find other options for new projects, or new versions of my
products, but they are practically limited to Delphi, as I depend on
several 3rd party tools that are not available for other platarforms. But
the STL is not available to Delphi, and, of course, the 4 years of BCB
(yes, I use __finally, __property and so on) code I have must be
translated... Bringing BCB to the Delphi world seems to me that will give
BCB a clear future (and maybe a much broader audience than now), so I
really have high hopes on not having to search for alternatives.

--
Rodrigo Gómez



Back to top
Andrue Cope [TeamB]
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Nov 09, 2004 10:53 am    Post subject: Re: BCB ALTERNATIVES AND MIGRATION PATH Reply with quote



Mark Jacobs wrote:

PMFJI.

Quote:
Could you please explain to me why you need .Net right now? It won't
run on Win9x platforms,

It won't run on CP/M either. Big deal.

Quote:
and its memory and processor constraints mean
that the only people who can run it tolerably are power PC users.

It runs okay on the HP Kayaks we have here and they are horrible P3
based wrecks(*). Or is it P2?. Whatever. If a .NET application can run
on one of those I don't think we have much to worry about.

Computers change. Operating systems change. New technology should be
investigated fully before discarding or embracing it. Just saying 'pah'
and refusing to look at it helps no one.

(*)The name is a good one. It allows you to comment about "being up
excrement creek in a Kayak without a paddle" Smile
--
Andrue Cope [TeamB]
[Bicester, Uk]
http://info.borland.com/newsgroups/guide.html

Back to top
Andrue Cope [TeamB]
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Nov 09, 2004 11:34 am    Post subject: Re: BCB ALTERNATIVES AND MIGRATION PATH Reply with quote



Des O'Toole wrote:

Quote:
It runs okay on the HP Kayaks we have here and they are horrible P3
based wrecks(*).

With faulty clocks ? Smile

Lol, probably. Those machines are hideous. I think we picked them up on
the cheap from HP a couple of years ago.

--
Andrue Cope [TeamB]
[Bicester, Uk]
http://info.borland.com/newsgroups/guide.html

Back to top
Mark Jacobs
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Nov 09, 2004 11:40 am    Post subject: Re: BCB ALTERNATIVES AND MIGRATION PATH Reply with quote

Could you please explain to me why you need .Net right now? It won't run on
Win9x platforms, and its memory and processor constraints mean that the only
people who can run it tolerably are power PC users.
--
Mark Jacobs
DK Computing
http://www.dkcomputing.co.uk

"Des O'Toole" <des> wrote

Quote:
Hi Rodrigo

We're both in the same boat, and share the same outlook.

I've also been forced to evaluate all the migration options and the only
other thing I'm hoping for is that more 3rd party vendors produce pure .Net
versions of their components (as Developer Express have), rather than
VCL.NET versions. At least this way, a migration to C++ VS.NET may not be as
painful.

In the meantime we're restructuring a lot of our code so that we don't use
VCL components directly. Instead we use a core subset of highly customised
derivatives. Hopefully this will make it easier if we then have to switch to
.NET, or any other environment. For instance, rather than worrying about a
thousand TForms, we will only have to concentrate on adapting WinForms to
provide our core, standardised behaviour. As well as hopefully easing
migration this is also paying dividends in standardising the look and feel
of our user interface and making the code much cleaner.

But still, fingers crossed for a new BCB.

Des

"Rodrigo Gómez" <rgomez (AT) tsradio (DOT) com.mx> wrote in message
news:418ea5d9$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
To everyone:
Even if Borland say anything positive about future developments regarding
BCB (officially) would you trust them to commit to it in the future after
the way we have been treated in the past?

There are not much options really. For me, I'm willing to forget and
forgive Borland as long as they bring something good to the BCB world
again. BCB is such a great tool, and I have sooooo much time, money and
experience invested here, that changing this to another framework/language
will be too expensive, and improductive, if possible at all. I know it
might not be a wise decision to continue with Borland after the lack of a
clear path, but me business depends on the products I already have, and I
have to continue supporting and creating new features for them for the
next 5-10 years maybe (I still have one of my 3 big apps in BCB4!!!), so a
fixed IDE and up to date VCL will be a great help, even if it's the last
one.

I'm trying to find other options for new projects, or new versions of my
products, but they are practically limited to Delphi, as I depend on
several 3rd party tools that are not available for other platarforms. But
the STL is not available to Delphi, and, of course, the 4 years of BCB
(yes, I use __finally, __property and so on) code I have must be
translated... Bringing BCB to the Delphi world seems to me that will give
BCB a clear future (and maybe a much broader audience than now), so I
really have high hopes on not having to search for alternatives.

--
Rodrigo Gómez






Back to top
Des O'Toole
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Nov 09, 2004 11:58 am    Post subject: Re: BCB ALTERNATIVES AND MIGRATION PATH Reply with quote

"Mark Jacobs" <http://www.jacobsm.com/mjmsg?Borland%20Newsgroup> wrote in
message news:4190ac88$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
Quote:
Could you please explain to me why you need .Net right now? It won't run
on
Win9x platforms, and its memory and processor constraints mean that the
only
people who can run it tolerably are power PC users.

Actually I don't need .NET at all at the moment. I will continue to use BCB
for the forseeable future.But I have investigated what our exit strategy
will be should we ever need to move on from BCB, currently .NET is the
strongest contender. Whilst investigating this I've come to the conclusion
that making code changes to ease any future transition will also benefit our
current codebase under BCB.

Des

Quote:

"Des O'Toole" <des> wrote in message
news:418f5195$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
| Hi Rodrigo
|
| We're both in the same boat, and share the same outlook.
|
| I've also been forced to evaluate all the migration options and the only
| other thing I'm hoping for is that more 3rd party vendors produce pure
.Net
| versions of their components (as Developer Express have), rather than
| VCL.NET versions. At least this way, a migration to C++ VS.NET may not
be as
| painful.
|
| In the meantime we're restructuring a lot of our code so that we don't
use
| VCL components directly. Instead we use a core subset of highly
customised
| derivatives. Hopefully this will make it easier if we then have to
switch to
| .NET, or any other environment. For instance, rather than worrying about
a
| thousand TForms, we will only have to concentrate on adapting WinForms
to
| provide our core, standardised behaviour. As well as hopefully easing
| migration this is also paying dividends in standardising the look and
feel
| of our user interface and making the code much cleaner.
|
| But still, fingers crossed for a new BCB.
|
| Des
|
| "Rodrigo Gómez" <rgomez (AT) tsradio (DOT) com.mx> wrote in message
| news:418ea5d9$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
| >> To everyone:
| >> Even if Borland say anything positive about future developments
regarding
| >> BCB (officially) would you trust them to commit to it in the future
after
| >> the way we have been treated in the past?
|
| > There are not much options really. For me, I'm willing to forget and
| > forgive Borland as long as they bring something good to the BCB world
| > again. BCB is such a great tool, and I have sooooo much time, money
and
| > experience invested here, that changing this to another
framework/language
| > will be too expensive, and improductive, if possible at all. I know it
| > might not be a wise decision to continue with Borland after the lack
of a
| > clear path, but me business depends on the products I already have,
and I
| > have to continue supporting and creating new features for them for the
| > next 5-10 years maybe (I still have one of my 3 big apps in BCB4!!!),
so a
| > fixed IDE and up to date VCL will be a great help, even if it's the
last
| > one.
|
| > I'm trying to find other options for new projects, or new versions of
my
| > products, but they are practically limited to Delphi, as I depend on
| > several 3rd party tools that are not available for other platarforms.
But
| > the STL is not available to Delphi, and, of course, the 4 years of BCB
| > (yes, I use __finally, __property and so on) code I have must be
| > translated... Bringing BCB to the Delphi world seems to me that will
give
| > BCB a clear future (and maybe a much broader audience than now), so I
| > really have high hopes on not having to search for alternatives.
|
| > --
| > Rodrigo Gómez
|
|
|





Back to top
Des O'Toole
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Nov 09, 2004 12:12 pm    Post subject: Re: BCB ALTERNATIVES AND MIGRATION PATH Reply with quote


"Andrue Cope [TeamB]" <no.spam (AT) not (DOT) a.valid.address> wrote

Quote:

It runs okay on the HP Kayaks we have here and they are horrible P3
based wrecks(*).

With faulty clocks ? :-)

Des



Back to top
Des O'Toole
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Nov 09, 2004 12:41 pm    Post subject: Re: BCB ALTERNATIVES AND MIGRATION PATH Reply with quote

Hi Andrue

I was just commenting that the timestamp on your posts seem to be out by an
hour (perhaps an incorrect timezone ?).

Des


"Andrue Cope [TeamB]" <no.spam (AT) not (DOT) a.valid.address> wrote

Quote:
Des O'Toole wrote:

It runs okay on the HP Kayaks we have here and they are horrible P3
based wrecks(*).

With faulty clocks ? :-)

Lol, probably. Those machines are hideous. I think we picked them up on
the cheap from HP a couple of years ago.

--
Andrue Cope [TeamB]
[Bicester, Uk]
http://info.borland.com/newsgroups/guide.html



Back to top
Andrue Cope [TeamB]
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Nov 09, 2004 12:46 pm    Post subject: Re: BCB ALTERNATIVES AND MIGRATION PATH Reply with quote

Des O'Toole wrote:

Quote:
Hi Andrue

I was just commenting that the timestamp on your posts seem to be out
by an hour (perhaps an incorrect timezone ?)

Hmmm. Interesting. We did just come off DST. I had this problem with a
laptop once. Let me check.

--
Andrue Cope [TeamB]
[Bicester, Uk]
http://info.borland.com/newsgroups/guide.html

Back to top
Andrue Cope [TeamB]
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Nov 09, 2004 12:47 pm    Post subject: Re: BCB ALTERNATIVES AND MIGRATION PATH Reply with quote

Andrue Cope [TeamB] wrote:

Quote:
I was just commenting that the timestamp on your posts seem to be
out by an hour (perhaps an incorrect timezone ?)

Hmmm. Interesting. We did just come off DST. I had this problem with a
laptop once. Let me check.

Bah, yes. It's the same problem I had once before. Only thing is it was
caused by my laptop not being told to account for DST. This machine is
correctly configured to do that. I wonder if it's the newsreader?

--
Andrue Cope [TeamB]
[Bicester, Uk]
http://info.borland.com/newsgroups/guide.html

Back to top
Andrue Cope [TeamB]
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Nov 09, 2004 1:50 pm    Post subject: Re: BCB ALTERNATIVES AND MIGRATION PATH Reply with quote

Des O'Toole wrote:

Quote:
If you look at Andue's headers you will see there is a 7 hour time
differential, he probably has a US timezone setting for his clock.
This is why it will get confused when changing between GMT/BST.

That's what I first thought but that isn't the case. My machine is
configured as being "GMT (Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London)" with the
daylight savings box checked.

Last time this happened it was because my Toshiba laptop didn't have
the DST check box checked.

--
Andrue Cope [TeamB]
[Bicester, Uk]
http://info.borland.com/newsgroups/guide.html

Back to top
Des O'Toole
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Nov 09, 2004 2:02 pm    Post subject: Re: BCB ALTERNATIVES AND MIGRATION PATH Reply with quote

I presume you are posting from the States, if you are posting from the UK
then your timezone is way off.

Des


"Andrue Cope [TeamB]" <no.spam (AT) not (DOT) a.valid.address> wrote

Quote:
Andrue Cope [TeamB] wrote:

I was just commenting that the timestamp on your posts seem to be
out by an hour (perhaps an incorrect timezone ?)

Hmmm. Interesting. We did just come off DST. I had this problem with a
laptop once. Let me check.

Bah, yes. It's the same problem I had once before. Only thing is it was
caused by my laptop not being told to account for DST. This machine is
correctly configured to do that. I wonder if it's the newsreader?

--
Andrue Cope [TeamB]
[Bicester, Uk]
http://info.borland.com/newsgroups/guide.html



Back to top
Pete Fraser
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Nov 09, 2004 2:05 pm    Post subject: Re: BCB ALTERNATIVES AND MIGRATION PATH Reply with quote

Andrue lives & works in the UK
His times are only 1 hour out for me (in the UK) and we recently put our
clocks
back as Summer(?) time ended so that's probably why...
Rgds Pete

"Des O'Toole" <des> wrote

Quote:
I presume you are posting from the States, if you are posting from the UK
then your timezone is way off.



Back to top
Des O'Toole
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Nov 09, 2004 2:09 pm    Post subject: Re: BCB ALTERNATIVES AND MIGRATION PATH Reply with quote

I'm from the UK too.

If you look at Andue's headers you will see there is a 7 hour time
differential, he probably has a US timezone setting for his clock. This is
why it will get confused when changing between GMT/BST.

Des

"Pete Fraser" <pete._no_spam_fraser (AT) frasersoft (DOT) nospam.net> wrote

Quote:
Andrue lives & works in the UK
His times are only 1 hour out for me (in the UK) and we recently put our
clocks
back as Summer(?) time ended so that's probably why...
Rgds Pete

"Des O'Toole" <des> wrote in message
news:4190cde1$2 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
I presume you are posting from the States, if you are posting from the UK
then your timezone is way off.





Back to top
Andrue Cope [TeamB]
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Nov 09, 2004 2:17 pm    Post subject: Re: BCB ALTERNATIVES AND MIGRATION PATH Reply with quote

Micha Nelissen wrote:

Quote:
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 13:35:44 +0100

So maybe your news client is not "listening" to your OS ?

Looks like it. I'll try and get on the support groups and see.

--
Andrue Cope [TeamB]
[Bicester, Uk]
http://info.borland.com/newsgroups/guide.html

Back to top
Micha Nelissen
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Nov 09, 2004 2:59 pm    Post subject: Re: BCB ALTERNATIVES AND MIGRATION PATH Reply with quote

Andrue Cope [TeamB] wrote:
Quote:
That's what I first thought but that isn't the case. My machine is
configured as being "GMT (Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London)" with the
daylight savings box checked.

This is what your headers say:

Date: 9 Nov 2004 06:50:05 -0700

This is an earlier message from myself:

Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 13:35:44 +0100

So maybe your news client is not "listening" to your OS ?

Micha

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BorlandTalk.com Forum Index -> C++ Builder (Non-Technical) All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group
SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.