 |
BorlandTalk.com Borland discussion newsgroups
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Steven Beales Guest
|
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 5:48 am Post subject: Re: ECO II vs. Bold + BoldExpress |
|
|
| Quote: | Can you use CSS in ASP.Net?
|
Of course - each control has a CssClass that you can directly assign.
| Quote: | Can you navigate to an object directly through a url?
|
Yes, using datagrids, .NET databinding and datagrid templates.
Steven Beales
Chief Software Engineer
Medical Decision Logic, Inc.
724 Dulaney Valley Road, Suite 2
Towson, MD 21204
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steven Beales Guest
|
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 6:06 am Post subject: Re: ECO II vs. Bold + BoldExpress |
|
|
| Quote: | How does ASP.NET work compared to plain old ASP, IntraWeb or BoldRetina?
|
ASP.NET is a managed component-based framework for the web.
ASP.NET vs ASP is like Delphi vs Pascal. IntraWeb is more similar to
ASP.NET but the .NET framework is a huge framework like J2EE and is managed
code.
| Quote: | How do you design your GUI? Like a form designer? Like plain old ASP =
messy mixture of HTML and script code? What? |
Form designer
| Quote: | What about security? Access rights, user authentication, ...
|
..NET framework has a comprehensive declarative security framework that can
either be tightly bound to Windows security or declared using XML or .NET
attributes.
| Quote: | How easy/difficult is it to create my own web tree control using ASP.NET
with ECO II behind the scenes? |
Not that hard ... you'd be using a tree server control and writing some
code/ocl to poulate it with ECO objects.
| Quote: | How can I handle load balancing. Say my server application will do some
heavy processing on some calls and I don't want other users to have to |
wait in line for that call to return. In other words, I want to deploy
to or more instances of the server application and user calls to be
mapped to a server that's idle (if any)
Easily ... ASP.NET supports web gardens ... you can choose to use SQL Server
to store your session state, then deploy your application unchanged in this
configuration with many servers.
We've written many ASP.NET applications - we're currently seeing how well
ECO II does under ASP.NET...
Steven Beales
Chief Software Engineer
Medical Decision Logic, Inc.
724 Dulaney Valley Road, Suite 2
Towson, MD 21204
"Kjell Rilbe" <krilbe.sp (AT) mblock (DOT) home.se> wrote
Kjell Rilbe wrote:
| Quote: | I'd like to know what I would gain and lose by moving from Bold +
BoldExpress to ECO II. Never mind the Win32/.NET platform switch - I
know about that.
|
Thanks Sam and Bryan for your replies. But I don't really feel I know
more now than I did before.
How does ASP.NET work compared to plain old ASP, IntraWeb or BoldRetina?
How do you design your GUI? Like a form designer? Like plain old ASP =
messy mixture of HTML and script code? What?
What about security? Access rights, user authentication, ...
How easy/difficult is it to create my own web tree control using ASP.NET
with ECO II behind the scenes? I need a *large* tree with headers and
checkboxes with some extras (try www.itadress.se and press the button
"Gå in som gäst" if you want to see it).
How can I handle load balancing. Say my server application will do some
heavy processing on some calls and I don't want other users to have to
wait in line for that call to return. In other words, I want to deploy
to or more instances of the server application and user calls to be
mapped to a server that's idle (if any). (Btw, BoldExpress doesn't
really do this either, but it does allow me to deploy multiple instances
and have user *sessions* distributed between the instances in a round
robin fashion.)
Thanks,
Kjell
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kjell Rilbe
Home: +46 8 7610734
Cell: +46 733 442464
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"If there's a price for bein' me, that's one I'll have to pay"
Aaron Tippin
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kjell Rilbe Guest
|
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 6:37 am Post subject: Re: ECO II vs. Bold + BoldExpress |
|
|
Thank you Steven for your input. A couple of follow-up questions below.
Steven Beales wrote:
| Quote: | How do you design your GUI? Like a form designer? Like plain old ASP =
messy mixture of HTML and script code? What?
Form designer
|
One thing I didn't like about IntraWeb when I tried it was that it would
require page reloads in various situations that I as a user would not
normally perceive as "now I'm going to post this form and get a new
page". In other words I got the feeling that it would reload the page
while I was working with it, interrupting my work. (Event handlers as
well as many property changes would trigger a page reload.)
Does ASP.NET suffer from this as well?
| Quote: | How easy/difficult is it to create my own web tree control using ASP.NET
with ECO II behind the scenes?
Not that hard ... you'd be using a tree server control and writing some
code/ocl to poulate it with ECO objects.
|
My tree contains about 15 main items (headers) and about 2000
checkboxes, each representing a Bold object. I've written a JavaScript
to handle this tree. When submitting the form, it will post a list of
checkbox BoldID:s in a SOAP parameter (BoldExpress). It's important that
the tree loads fairly quickly and is responsive to user actions.
Would this be easy, hard, impossible with ASP.NET?
Thanks,
Kjell
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kjell Rilbe
Home: +46 8 7610734
Cell: +46 733 442464
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"If there's a price for bein' me, that's one I'll have to pay"
Aaron Tippin
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steven Beales Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 2:19 am Post subject: Re: ECO II vs. Bold + BoldExpress |
|
|
Hi Kjell
| Quote: | (Event handlers as
well as many property changes would trigger a page reload.)
Does ASP.NET suffer from this as well?
|
This is how ASP.NET works out of the box with server-side event handlers
that require a postback of the page. However, in the new ASP.NET 2.0
framework (still in beta) you can use script callbacks. Script callbacks
provide the plumbing for a remote URL call without redrawing the page or
disrupting the application flow. They are available in recent browsers that
support the XmlHttpRequest object.
| Quote: | I've written a JavaScript
to handle this tree. When submitting the form, it will post a list of
checkbox BoldID:s in a SOAP parameter (BoldExpress). It's important that
the tree loads fairly quickly and is responsive to user actions.
Would this be easy, hard, impossible with ASP.NET?
|
With ASP.NET you can always just use JavaScript and do the same thing.
There are various ASP.NET tree controls you can try out but ultimately they
all render themselves as a mix of
JavaScript and HTML,so you might as well just reuse your existing JavaScript
tree. ASP.NET support for SOAP/web services is excellent.
Thanks
Steven
"Kjell Rilbe" <krilbe.sp (AT) mblock (DOT) home.se> wrote
| Quote: | Thank you Steven for your input. A couple of follow-up questions below.
Steven Beales wrote:
How do you design your GUI? Like a form designer? Like plain old ASP =
messy mixture of HTML and script code? What?
Form designer
One thing I didn't like about IntraWeb when I tried it was that it would
require page reloads in various situations that I as a user would not
normally perceive as "now I'm going to post this form and get a new
page". In other words I got the feeling that it would reload the page
while I was working with it, interrupting my work. (Event handlers as
well as many property changes would trigger a page reload.)
Does ASP.NET suffer from this as well?
How easy/difficult is it to create my own web tree control using
ASP.NET
with ECO II behind the scenes?
Not that hard ... you'd be using a tree server control and writing some
code/ocl to poulate it with ECO objects.
My tree contains about 15 main items (headers) and about 2000
checkboxes, each representing a Bold object. I've written a JavaScript
to handle this tree. When submitting the form, it will post a list of
checkbox BoldID:s in a SOAP parameter (BoldExpress). It's important that
the tree loads fairly quickly and is responsive to user actions.
Would this be easy, hard, impossible with ASP.NET?
Thanks,
Kjell
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Kjell Rilbe
Home: +46 8 7610734
Cell: +46 733 442464
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
"If there's a price for bein' me, that's one I'll have to pay"
Aaron Tippin
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
- |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kjell Rilbe Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 7:19 am Post subject: Re: ECO II vs. Bold + BoldExpress |
|
|
Thank you Steve for clearing up a few things about ASP.NET for me.
Kjell
Steven Beales wrote:
[snip]
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kjell Rilbe
Home: +46 8 7610734
Cell: +46 733 442464
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"If there's a price for bein' me, that's one I'll have to pay"
Aaron Tippin
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|