BorlandTalk.com Forum Index BorlandTalk.com
Borland discussion newsgroups
 
Archives   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Re: Emulators are less important than priorities for BCB v9

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BorlandTalk.com Forum Index -> C++ Builder (Non-Technical)
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Des O'Toole
Guest





PostPosted: Fri May 14, 2004 12:27 am    Post subject: Re: Emulators are less important than priorities for BCB v9 Reply with quote



Hi Randall

"Randall Parker" <STOPtechiepundit (AT) EVILfuturePOXpunditSPAM (DOT) com> wrote in
message news:40a4101d (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...

Quote:
But think about what is important to you as a BCB user. Borland is going
to come out
with a new version of BCB. Now is the time to tell Borland what are the
most
important things that you absolutely want to have in that next version.

Are there any QC entries you'd like to see people vote for?

Are there any ideas you have that are not now QC entries?

Personally, I think it will be better to wait for the open letter. Then open
the floodgates on the QC entries.

Just my opinion.

Des



Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BorlandTalk.com Forum Index -> C++ Builder (Non-Technical) All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group
SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.