 |
BorlandTalk.com Borland discussion newsgroups
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Hans-Martin Brückmann Guest
|
Posted: Mon Apr 05, 2004 4:53 pm Post subject: Re: Help ! |
|
|
Hi Sasan,
you may follow the discussions about the new .net framwork and perhaps
find out that if you start a complete new project, that it may be
better too turn to m$ (VS .NET). This is because Borland does not
continue the BCB line anyway and it seems no other way to continue C++
than with m$. This all looks very sad. I am in the same situation, I
used BCB5 for many years with over 400 components in use an several
self-written ones. Now my customer is lounching a new Project and it
seems that all these resources are lost for BCB-Programmers.
HMB
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Valence Crearer Guest
|
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2004 1:32 pm Post subject: Re: Help ! |
|
|
BCB5 is still the best Win32 RAD, unless you need SOAP/XML in which case
BCB6 may be better after getting used to the bugs. And will be until Microsoft
does away with present operating systems.
Where web apps reign, so does VS Studio.NET.
Hans-Martin Brückmann wrote:
| Quote: | Hi Sasan,
you may follow the discussions about the new .net framwork and perhaps
find out that if you start a complete new project, that it may be
better too turn to m$ (VS .NET). This is because Borland does not
continue the BCB line anyway and it seems no other way to continue C++
than with m$. This all looks very sad. I am in the same situation, I
used BCB5 for many years with over 400 components in use an several
self-written ones. Now my customer is lounching a new Project and it
seems that all these resources are lost for BCB-Programmers.
HMB
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|