BorlandTalk.com Forum Index BorlandTalk.com
Borland discussion newsgroups
 
Archives   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Re: Interface without coclass

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BorlandTalk.com Forum Index -> C++ Builder (ActiveX)
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Mark Guerrieri
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 3:38 pm    Post subject: Re: Interface without coclass Reply with quote



That's because the CoClass IS the implementation on the interface. Defining
an interface does exactly that- defines an interface only and leaves the
implementation up to the implementor.

If you cretae a new ActiveX/COM object and tell the TLB to have it implement
your interface (from the 'Implements' tab of the CoClass in the TLB), then
the TLB will generate the skeleton code for your object. You may have to
add the type library containing your interface in the 'Uses' tab of the main
library TLB node for the new object as well.

Mark


Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BorlandTalk.com Forum Index -> C++ Builder (ActiveX) All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group
SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.