BorlandTalk.com Forum Index BorlandTalk.com
Borland discussion newsgroups
 
Archives   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Re: Is there a future for Borland in .NET?
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BorlandTalk.com Forum Index -> Delphi Non-Technical
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
David Clegg
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 10:57 am    Post subject: Re: Is there a future for Borland in .NET? Reply with quote



Nikos wrote:

Quote:
Your opinion please

I most definitely see Borland having a strong future in .NET. And IMHO
Enterprise Core Objects is going to be a key player in Borlands success
in the .NET arena. This is one area I think their main .NET competitor
won't come close to touching for quite some time.

--
Cheers,
David Clegg
[email]dclegg (AT) gmail (DOT) com[/email]

Vote 1 http://cc.borland.com/codecentral/ccweb.exe/listing?id=21489 Smile
Now supports Google Groups searching with Dyna-extend(tm) technology!

QualityCentral. The best way to bug Borland about bugs.
http://qc.borland.com

"Marge, your paintings look like the things they look like." - Homer
Simpson.

Back to top
Peter Morris [Droopy eyes
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 11:04 am    Post subject: Re: Is there a future for Borland in .NET? Reply with quote



hehe, you convert :-)


Back to top
Kristofer Skaug
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 11:07 am    Post subject: Re: Is there a future for Borland in .NET? Reply with quote



Nikos wrote:
Quote:
Your opinion please

Is there a future for _anyone_ in .NET?

--
Kristofer



Back to top
David Clegg
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 11:13 am    Post subject: Re: Is there a future for Borland in .NET? Reply with quote

Peter Morris [Droopy eyes software] wrote:

Quote:
hehe, you convert Smile

Totally! I'm thinking of renaming my blog "Confessions of an ECO
Junkie" :-)

Ever since C#Builder came out, ECO was one technology I was extremely
interested in investigating further. But it wasn't until recently that
I actually knuckled down and started learning it. Now I can't picture
life without it. ;-)

--
Cheers,
David Clegg
[email]dclegg (AT) gmail (DOT) com[/email]

Vote 1 http://cc.borland.com/codecentral/ccweb.exe/listing?id=21489 Smile
Now supports Google Groups searching with Dyna-extend(tm) technology!

QualityCentral. The best way to bug Borland about bugs.
http://qc.borland.com

"Beer. Now there's a temporary solution." - Homer Simpson

Back to top
Steve Heights
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 11:23 am    Post subject: Re: Is there a future for Borland in .NET? Reply with quote

Quote:
Is there a future for _anyone_ in .NET?

Is there a future for anyone _outside_ .NET?


Steve



Back to top
Adam Roslon
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 11:36 am    Post subject: Re: Is there a future for Borland in .NET? Reply with quote

In article <42e0cf30 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com>, [email]nandrianakis (AT) summerland (DOT) gr[/email]
says...
Quote:
Your opinion please




I think Borland will continue to play a large part in .NET however I
don't see the future of .NET as being strong. .NET is not catching on as
Microsoft hoped and knowing Microsoft from past experience It's only a
matter of time until their marketing machine rolls out the the next
technology to save us all and .NET slowly fades into the sunset.

Back to top
roman modic
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 11:38 am    Post subject: Re: Is there a future for Borland in .NET? Reply with quote

Hello,

"Steve Heights" <anaconda51(put an AT here)gmx(this is a DOT)net> wrote in
message news:42e0d753 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
Quote:
Is there a future for _anyone_ in .NET?

Is there a future for anyone _outside_ .NET?



There is future only for those on the edge ...

Cheers, Roman



Back to top
Adam Roslon
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 11:38 am    Post subject: Re: Is there a future for Borland in .NET? Reply with quote

In article <42e0d753 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com>, "Steve Heights"
<anaconda51(put an AT here)gmx(this is a DOT)net> says...
Quote:
Is there a future for anyone _outside_ .NET?


I hope so if Microsoft plans on releasing new versions of their Office
suite.

Back to top
Dominic Willems
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 11:45 am    Post subject: Re: Is there a future for Borland in .NET? Reply with quote

Steve Heights wrote:
Quote:
Is there a future for anyone _outside_ .NET?

Would there be any statistics about what group of developers are moving
to .NET, I wonder.

Logically, I'd presume that, at the moment, the most prevalent group
there are the VB developers, since they have been quite assertively
ushered into that direction by their beloved tools provider.

For those doing Delphi, the advantages of .NET are not that striking,
since essentially there isn't an app that Delphi Win32 can't do
elegantly today. Logical that Delphi developers wait for at least .NET
2.0 to surface.



Back to top
Eric Grange
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 11:46 am    Post subject: Re: Is there a future for Borland in .NET? Reply with quote

Quote:
Is there a future for anyone _outside_ .NET?

Is there a future for anyone outside Java?

Anyway, what's sure is that there isn't much of a future for .Net 1.1
as it already can't access some recent MS APIs as discussed in another
thread.

Eric

Back to top
David Clegg
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 11:59 am    Post subject: Re: Is there a future for Borland in .NET? Reply with quote

Dominic Willems wrote:

Quote:
Would there be any statistics about what group of developers are
moving to .NET, I wonder.

I know its not much of a sample, but 100% of the last two companies to
employ me are migrating to .NET. One was mainly a Visual Studio shop,
with me as the renegade Delphi developer, and my current employer is
predominantly a Delphi shop. Most of our new development will be in C#,
although Delphi still has a strong future there.

In fact, my boss talked to me today about upgrading from D6 to D2005
for some of our serverside stuff, and we're all currently busy porting
an existing C++ app to D6 (with a week and a half deadline given to
us). And we have a Delphi for .NET app in production, thanks to me. <g>

--
Cheers,
David Clegg
[email]dclegg (AT) gmail (DOT) com[/email]

Vote 1 http://cc.borland.com/codecentral/ccweb.exe/listing?id=21489 Smile
Now supports Google Groups searching with Dyna-extend(tm) technology!

QualityCentral. The best way to bug Borland about bugs.
http://qc.borland.com

"Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand." - Homer
Simpson

Back to top
Sergio Sette
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:24 pm    Post subject: Re: Is there a future for Borland in .NET? Reply with quote


Quote:
And IMHO
Enterprise Core Objects is going to be a key player in Borlands success
in the .NET arena. This is one area I think their main .NET competitor
won't come close to touching for quite some time.


Are you sure ? There are so many OPF for .NET ...(please see :
http://sharptoolbox.com/Category74089b0a-1105-4389-b1db-eedf27e20cfb.aspx)

Some of these are really very interesting (i.e. nhibernate - a .net porting
of the java ORM Hibernate) Free and Open Source.

Best Regards

Sergio sette



Back to top
David Clegg
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:28 pm    Post subject: Re: Is there a future for Borland in .NET? Reply with quote

Sergio Sette wrote:

Quote:
Are you sure ? There are so many OPF for .NET

Without meaning to trivialise the products you mentioned, ECO is so
much more than a mere OPF. The object persistence capabilities are just
one of many frameworks and benefits that ECO offers.

--
Cheers,
David Clegg
[email]dclegg (AT) gmail (DOT) com[/email]

Vote 1 http://cc.borland.com/codecentral/ccweb.exe/listing?id=21489 Smile
Now supports Google Groups searching with Dyna-extend(tm) technology!

QualityCentral. The best way to bug Borland about bugs.
http://qc.borland.com

"I am so smart, I am so smart, s-m-r-t ." - Homer Simpson

Back to top
Kristofer Skaug
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 1:50 pm    Post subject: Re: Is there a future for Borland in .NET? Reply with quote

Adam Roslon wrote:
<...> knowing Microsoft from past experience It's
Quote:
only a matter of time until their marketing machine rolls out the the
next technology to save us all and .NET slowly fades into the sunset.

Correction to that, I think .NET usage (except for legacy) will evaporate
almost instantly at the moment Microsoft rolls out the Next Great Stuff.

The same suckers who've fallen for the .NET.Hype ("you've
gotta-Gotta-GOTTA switch NOW, because your competitors [silly buggers,
hehe] already have!") will surely fall for the next wave of hype as well.

Only their losses next time will be much bigger than for the Win32/.NET
watershed: just a few years' worth of revenues for their .NET
investments, in a market that is completely unexcited about that "sooooo
turn-of-the-century" fad term.

--
Kristofer



Back to top
Mike Mader
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 2:05 pm    Post subject: Re: Is there a future for Borland in .NET? Reply with quote

"Eric Grange" <egrangeNO (AT) SPAMglscene (DOT) org> wrote

Quote:
Is there a future for anyone _outside_ .NET?

Is there a future for anyone outside Java?

Anyway, what's sure is that there isn't much of a future for .Net 1.1
as it already can't access some recent MS APIs as discussed in another
thread.

Eric

Our company is starting to focus on Java more than anything. Especially
because of the strong support for Java from Oracle.

Thanks,

mike



Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BorlandTalk.com Forum Index -> Delphi Non-Technical All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Page 1 of 10

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group
SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.