BorlandTalk.com Forum Index BorlandTalk.com
Borland discussion newsgroups
 
Archives   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Re: So when is Borland going to Drop C++ Builder? (eom)

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BorlandTalk.com Forum Index -> C++ Builder (Non-Technical)
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
William Meyer
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2003 3:02 pm    Post subject: Re: So when is Borland going to Drop C++ Builder? (eom) Reply with quote



On 22-Jun-03, Ed Mulroy [TeamB] said:

Quote:
You must have found out about the secret plans. Oh well, since you already
know, might as well tell you when. July 23, 2067 at 9:41PM Pacific time.

There goes your NDA! <g>

--
Bill
--------
People have a right to their own cultures -- even Americans. Those who come here and say that they cannot follow some of our laws that conflict with their culture are free to leave. -- Thomas Sowell

Back to top
Gillmer J. Derge [TeamB]
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2003 3:36 pm    Post subject: Re: So when is Borland going to Drop C++ Builder? (eom) Reply with quote



"CapStick" <lol (AT) ljones81 (DOT) fsnet.co.uk> wrote

Quote:
Having read all the above.
I'm curios.
When is borland going to dropC++ Builder ?...

I once had a teacher who said the only stupid question is one not asked,
but I think you just proved her wrong. I don't understand why people
bother asking questions like this. First, if you really did read all of
the above, how did you manage to miss the answer? Borland doesn't have
any plans to drop C++Builder. Second, even if they did plan to drop it,
do you think they'd go out of their way to publicize it?

--
Gillmer J. Derge [TeamB]



Back to top
Rhys Sage
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2003 5:43 pm    Post subject: Re: So when is Borland going to Drop C++ Builder? (eom) Reply with quote



I'm sure I saw it at the breakfast table written on the back of a packet of
Microsoft Flakes.

--
Yours,

Rhys Sage.

Thought of the day:
"Work saves us from three great evils -
vice, boredom and need"

-Voltaire

(Team Zip)




Back to top
William Meyer
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2003 9:43 pm    Post subject: Re: So when is Borland going to Drop C++ Builder? (eom) Reply with quote

On 23-Jun-03, Rhys Sage said:

Quote:
No. It's actually being discontinued from July 4th, this year. Why do you
imagine there isn't a BCB 7 yet? It's because Borland is going to
concentrate all its resources on Linux-based compilers as opposed to
Windows-based compilers. BCB 6 is the last of the BCB packages.

Oh, right, because of the immense profitability of commercial software in the Linux sector...

--
Bill
--------
People have a right to their own cultures -- even Americans. Those who come here and say that they cannot follow some of our laws that conflict with their culture are free to leave. -- Thomas Sowell


Back to top
Thomas J. Theobald
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jun 27, 2003 4:19 pm    Post subject: Re: So when is Borland going to Drop C++ Builder? (eom) Reply with quote

Wow, that was definitely a blaze of wisdom...or maybe someone just lit a
match after eating mexican.

Just from where I sit, I'd say there isn't a BCB 7 yet because the cycle as
we observed it went D7 > C#B > ___, and we haven't seen what ___ is yet.

Why does crap like this keep bobbing up? You guys are eating too much
fiber. Go back and read a few year's worth of posts.

T



Back to top
Daniel James
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 4:02 pm    Post subject: Re: An interesting reading - objection to the fast track C/C Reply with quote

In article <43e21dfd$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com>, Duane Hebert wrote:
Quote:
FWIW, I would much prefer that Borland spend resources
on improving compatability with the existing standard,
rather than implementing extensions for a different
language.

Hear! Hear!

Compliance with the existing standard has to be the first goal, before
resources can be spared for other ventures.

Cheers,
Daniel.
Back to top
Robby Tanner
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 5:01 pm    Post subject: Re: IBEvents Reply with quote

"Jeff Overcash (TeamB)" <jeffovercash (AT) mindspring (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:43e40239$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
Quote:
Billb wrote:
Ingvar Anderberg in <43e2e66e (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com> inscribed:
I did submit a inquiry in delphi.database.dbexpress before posting
here. Which other ones do you suggest?

borland.public.delphi.database.general

borland.public.interbase.general

Thanks, I posted to database.general.

Regards,
Rob
Back to top
Randall Parker
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 5:02 am    Post subject: Re: An interesting reading - objection to the fast track C/C Reply with quote

Alisdair Meredith[TeamB] wrote:
Quote:
There is a lot to like about C++/CLI, think the comittee responsible
have done a fantastic job, and I really would like to see it become an
ISO standard. I also believe the name will cause a lot of confusion,
as do a lot of other BSI members. Hence the objection.

Alisdair,

Why do you want to see it as an ISO standard? ISO will not change it any. What's the
point?
Back to top
AlisdairM
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:01 pm    Post subject: Re: An interesting reading - objection to the fast track C/C Reply with quote

Randall Parker wrote:

Quote:
Alisdair,

Why do you want to see it as an ISO standard? ISO will not change it
any. What's the point?

It is a good standard, and should be recognised.
It was created with the intent of becoming an ISO standard, so that
others would respect and implement it. MS could have done this work
purely as an internal project, but chose to put it before the standards
bodies for approval. Indeed, they worked with other partners on the
ECMA panel to make it the best possible standard for portable code,
with features put in to support non-MS implementations of the CLR (such
as support for 32 bit wchar_t types on Posix implementations)

Given it is already an ECMA standard, we could leave it there. But ISO
is seen as 'the gold standard' of standards, and was always the goal.
I see no reason to deny that standard, once we acknowledge that this is
a language base-on/inspired by C++, rather than another version of C++
itself.

--
AlisdairM(TeamB)
Back to top
Martin Fensome
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 11:03 pm    Post subject: Re: Best Installer? Reply with quote

"Tom Woodrow" <tomwoodrow (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:43cff2ff$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
Quote:
Hi Gang ...

Looking for recommendations for an installer for a BCB5 application. Never
needed one before so I have no experience using one or setting it up.

I often use INF-Tool Pro, depending on what needs I have.
I creates SUPER SMALL setups.
http://www.inner-smile.com/dl_inf.htm

Martin
Back to top
Batteken
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:03 am    Post subject: Re: German ilink32 crashes with AV Reply with quote

Andreas Hausladen schreef:

Quote:
I forgot: BDS 2006


--
Regards,

Andreas Hausladen

Have you found already a solution for this. I have the same problem.

regards,
Bart
Back to top
Martin Fensome
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 9:03 pm    Post subject: Re: C++ magazines. Reply with quote

"Malcolm Smith" <mjfreelancing (AT) optusnet (DOT) com.au> wrote in message
news:43dfbaee (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
Quote:
C++Builder Developers Journal.

www.bcbjournal.com

Malcolm



Thanks for the reminder, just signed up with PayPal!

Martin
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BorlandTalk.com Forum Index -> C++ Builder (Non-Technical) All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group
SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.