| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Jonathan Benedicto Guest
|
Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 9:26 pm Post subject: reviews for mtbcc32 |
|
|
Hello All,
I'm adding a reviews section to my mtbcc32 page, and I was hoping if those
of you that use mtbcc32 would be able to write me short review, detailing
how mtbcc32 has decreased your compile times. I would also appreciate it if
you could download this project
http://www.jomitech.com/downloads/mtbcc32_benchmark.zip, and run the
following makes:
make -B -f makefile_1thread.mak
make -B -f makefile_2thread.mak
make -B -f makefile_4thread.mak
make -B -f makefile_8thread.mak
so that visitors can see actual benchmarked compile times.
Thank you very much all who participate. I really appreciate your taking
the time to do this.
Jonathan
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Andreas Hausladen Guest
|
Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 1:59 pm Post subject: Re: reviews for mtbcc32 |
|
|
mtbcc32 "disables" PCH if you use the -Hu (use but do not create PCH)
option. In that case the compiled will not create a new PCH file and the
mangled PCH filename (filename-<threadNum>) does not exist. So precompiled
headers are disabled.
If a -Hu is in the parameter list mtbcc32 should copy the PCH file and let
the first thread use the original filename. For my bcc32pch an extra
parameter that disables the renaming of the PCH file would be ideal
because the new upcommig version 2.1 will allow bcc32.exe to use one PCH
file in read mode by more processes (ShareMode is set to FILE_SHARE_READ
at runtime).
--
Regards,
Andreas Hausladen
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jonathan Benedicto Guest
|
Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 2:44 pm Post subject: Re: reviews for mtbcc32 |
|
|
Andreas Hausladen wrote:
| Quote: | mtbcc32 "disables" PCH if you use the -Hu (use but do not create PCH)
option. In that case the compiled will not create a new PCH file and
the mangled PCH filename (filename-<threadNum>) does not exist. So
precompiled headers are disabled.
If a -Hu is in the parameter list mtbcc32 should copy the PCH file
and let the first thread use the original filename. For my bcc32pch
an extra parameter that disables the renaming of the PCH file would
be ideal because the new upcommig version 2.1 will allow bcc32.exe to
use one PCH file in read mode by more processes (ShareMode is set to
FILE_SHARE_READ at runtime).
|
Ok, I'll work on that. Thank you for the suggestion.
Jonathan
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jonathan Benedicto Guest
|
Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 3:14 pm Post subject: Re: reviews for mtbcc32 |
|
|
Andreas Hausladen wrote:
BTW, I've added forums to my website, so features, bugs etc, can be
discussed there.
Jonathan
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jonathan Benedicto Guest
|
Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 5:35 pm Post subject: Re: reviews for mtbcc32 |
|
|
Andreas Hausladen wrote:
| Quote: | mtbcc32 "disables" PCH if you use the -Hu (use but do not create PCH)
option. In that case the compiled will not create a new PCH file and
the mangled PCH filename (filename-<threadNum>) does not exist. So
precompiled headers are disabled.
If a -Hu is in the parameter list mtbcc32 should copy the PCH file
and let the first thread use the original filename. For my bcc32pch
an extra parameter that disables the renaming of the PCH file would
be ideal because the new upcommig version 2.1 will allow bcc32.exe to
use one PCH file in read mode by more processes (ShareMode is set to
FILE_SHARE_READ at runtime).
|
Done. New version 1.7. I'll post a changelog in thirdpartytools.
Jonathan
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Andreas Hausladen Guest
|
Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 9:11 pm Post subject: Re: reviews for mtbcc32 |
|
|
Jonathan Benedicto wrote:
| Quote: | BTW, I've added forums to my website, so features, bugs etc, can be
discussed there.
|
But there is nobody :-)
--
Regards,
Andreas Hausladen
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jonathan Benedicto Guest
|
Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 9:12 pm Post subject: Re: reviews for mtbcc32 |
|
|
Andreas Hausladen wrote:
| Quote: | But there is nobody
|
Except me. I'm waiting for people to join.
Jonathan
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|