BorlandTalk.com Borland discussion newsgroups   Archives   FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in  scktsrvr multi processor fix          BorlandTalk.com Forum Index -> Delphi Databases (Multi-Tier) View previous topic :: View next topic   Author Message server Guest Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:01 am    Post subject: scktsrvr multi processor fix message unavailable Back to top Wayne Guest Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:01 am    Post subject: Re: scktsrvr multi processor fix Craig, we are using that one but still interested in whether the Delphi 2006 has been patched and if it is backwards compatible to Delphi 7. Wayne "Craig Stuntz [TeamB]" <craig_stuntz (AT) nospam (DOT) please [a.k.a. acm.org]> wrote in message news:43d91782$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com... Quote: Wayne wrote: Mark, we tried that but would prefer a Borland certified version. I can understand that, but I do trust Manuel Parma's fix. It's been out for years and I've hever heard of a problem with it. -- Craig Stuntz [TeamB] · Vertex Systems Corp. · Columbus, OH Delphi/InterBase Weblog : http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz Borland newsgroup denizen Sergio González has a new CD of Irish music out, and it's good: http://tinyurl.com/7hgfr Back to top paladin Guest Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:51 am    Post subject: Re: Server DateTime Quote: retrieve the datetime initially from the server and calculate the delta between server and client. Then everytime the client needs current datetime, use the client's datetime plus delta. I still have problems if the user changes the datetime after my app was started. And I know it happens sometimes. I know, it's weird, but happens. Changing the system clock certainly sounds like something that Windows would message all apps about. Catching that message would probably be more efficient than, say, running a 2nd client-side timer that periodically checked that your delta hadn't changed from it's *own* clock.... or, if you don't like timer-driven logic, you could do your time checking in your BeforeApplyUpdates ;) -paladin Back to top Craig Stuntz [TeamB] Guest Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 5:10 pm    Post subject: Re: scktsrvr multi processor fix Esteban Pacheco wrote: Quote: But i'm interested on this answer, is the socketserver fixed to address those issues in D2006? I have no idea. You might check the QC report. -- Craig Stuntz [TeamB] · Vertex Systems Corp. · Columbus, OH Delphi/InterBase Weblog : http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz All the great TeamB service you've come to expect plus (New!) Irish Tin Whistle tips: http://learningtowhistle.blogspot.com Back to top Bill Todd Guest Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 6:29 pm    Post subject: Re: Server DateTime Another possiblity, assuming all of the machines have Internet access, is to install one of the many programs that automatically sets the system clock from a a standard time source at regualr intervals. -- Bill Todd (TeamB) Back to top Mark Horrocks Guest Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 4:16 pm    Post subject: Re: scktsrvr multi processor fix Quote: But i'm interested on this answer, is the socketserver fixed to address those issues in D2006? I believe it is not, Manuel Parma's fix is the only one available. If in fact this is true, it is a terrible indictment of Borland's committment to fix technologies which are perceived as being "obsolete". Scktsrvr.exe is of paramount importance to anyone who uses remote data modules and is the TSocketConnection is the preferred connection method for this paradigm. It seems to me that Borland places a lot of emphasis on chasing new technologies in order to keep abreast of the rat pack and not enough in getting the older stuff rock solid. There are other less important examples such as linkfields.pas in Internet Express which was never fixed since D5. In the case of BDS 2006 and 2006, .NET is based on ver 1.1 which is apparently not even compatible with ver 2.0 due to the fact that Microsoft stuffed up the design and required some refactoring which means that BDS 2005 and 2006 can never be used with ver 2.0, rendering these versions of Delphi just junk in the future. D7 does just as much with Win32 as they do anyway. So, these expensive new versions of Delphi are just toys to play with until the real thing comes along maybe with the next version. And I won't even mention D8, the complete turkey. I am no computer engineer, nor even a competent OOP programmer, just and end user application developer mainly interested in developing database web apps. Much of what I have said here may be completely wrong and I want to qualify what I have said accordingly. Maybe ASP.NET has a lot to offer but I will wait till it matures a bit more before I blow more money than I can afford on the next version of Delphi. I for one, want to understand more about these issues in layman's terms because that's what I am and I feel that right or wrong, venting a bit might help me do that. I have only started using Delphi since 2000. Mark Horrocks www.sportdata.com.au www.corebusiness.com.au Back to top Craig Stuntz [TeamB] Guest Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 4:45 pm    Post subject: Re: scktsrvr multi processor fix Mark Horrocks wrote: Quote: In the case of BDS 2006 and 2006, .NET is based on ver 1.1 which is apparently not even compatible with ver 2.0 due to the fact that Microsoft stuffed up the design and required some refactoring which means that BDS 2005 and 2006 can never be used with ver 2.0, rendering these versions of Delphi just junk in the future. I have no idea what you're talking about. .NET 1.1 and 2.0 can coexist. D2006 can't support OS revisions released *after* it was. -- Craig Stuntz [TeamB] · Vertex Systems Corp. · Columbus, OH Delphi/InterBase Weblog : http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz How to ask questions the smart way: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html Back to top Joe Bain Guest Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 6:55 pm    Post subject: Re: ASP calling an application server York wrote: Quote: The question was not about creating a new instance of the object but. It MUST create a new instance of the object and it does. The problem is that it starts a new executable (instead of using the executable that is already started) for each new object but it should not. Check the intialiazation clause in the RDM unit. Make sure ciMultiInstance is the 4th param in the TComponentFactory.Create call. -------------- Joe Bain www.iegsoftware.com Back to top Craig Stuntz [TeamB] Guest Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 9:59 pm    Post subject: Re: scktsrvr multi processor fix Wayne wrote: Quote: Shoud this version work on that type of machine as well? Yes. In fact, that's mostly why it exists. -- Craig Stuntz [TeamB] · Vertex Systems Corp. · Columbus, OH Delphi/InterBase Weblog : http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz Useful articles about InterBase development: http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/category/21.aspx Back to top Wayne Guest Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 10:40 pm    Post subject: Re: scktsrvr multi processor fix Craig, We replaced the socket server with the compiled version from Manuel last week, but still get the random failures. The machine in question has hyper threading and multiple CPU's. Shoud this version work on that type of machine as well? I guess I am wondering if we have a different issue that just the scktsrvr issue. Wayne "Craig Stuntz [TeamB]" <craig_stuntz (AT) nospam (DOT) please [a.k.a. acm.org]> wrote in message news:43d91782$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com... Quote: Wayne wrote: Mark, we tried that but would prefer a Borland certified version. I can understand that, but I do trust Manuel Parma's fix. It's been out for years and I've hever heard of a problem with it. -- Craig Stuntz [TeamB] · Vertex Systems Corp. · Columbus, OH Delphi/InterBase Weblog : http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz Borland newsgroup denizen Sergio González has a new CD of Irish music out, and it's good: http://tinyurl.com/7hgfr Back to top Wayne Guest Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 9:31 pm    Post subject: Re: scktsrvr multi processor fix Craig, I assume this runs OK as a service? Wayne "Craig Stuntz [TeamB]" <craig_stuntz (AT) nospam (DOT) please [a.k.a. acm.org]> wrote in message news:43de53f3$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com... Quote: Wayne wrote: Shoud this version work on that type of machine as well? Yes. In fact, that's mostly why it exists. -- Craig Stuntz [TeamB] · Vertex Systems Corp. · Columbus, OH Delphi/InterBase Weblog : http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz Useful articles about InterBase development: http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/category/21.aspx Back to top Mark Horrocks Guest Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2006 7:33 am    Post subject: Re: scktsrvr multi processor fix Quote: I have no idea what you're talking about. .NET 1.1 and 2.0 can coexist. D2006 can't support OS revisions released *after* it was. OK thanks! Obviously I don't have any idea either. I am pretty good at using the stuff but no idea under the bonnet. Back to top Marc Rohloff [TeamB] Guest Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 2:54 am    Post subject: Re: 2nd Tier (RDM) needs recompiling on customer site On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 03:02:18 +0800, Fira Da Boss wrote: Quote: Hello, I have build a 2 tier application. Each apps is installed on different computer. Question is , whenever I modify the 2nd tier apps coding, I need to recompile it on the targeted computer to make it work. Replacing the EXE's doesn't seem to work. Can anyone xplain? THanks. You shouldn't need to, this would somehow imply that the computers are set up differently (different paths, dlls or versions) -- Marc Rohloff [TeamB] marc rohloff -at- myrealbox -dot- com Back to top Display posts from previous: All Posts1 Day7 Days2 Weeks1 Month3 Months6 Months1 Year Oldest FirstNewest First         BorlandTalk.com Forum Index -> Delphi Databases (Multi-Tier) All times are GMT Page 1 of 1   Jump to: Select a forum C++ Builder Newsgroups----------------C++ BuilderC++ Builder (ActiveX)C++ Builder (Announcements)C++ Builder (Command Line Tools)C++ Builder DatabasesC++ Builder Databases (ADO)C++ Builder Databases (Desktop)C++ Builder Databases (InterBase Express)C++ Builder Databases (Multi-Tier)C++ Builder Databases (SQL Servers)C++ Builder (Graphics)C++ Builder (IDE)C++ Builder (Internet)C++ Builder (Internet Socket)C++ Builder (Internet Web)C++ Builder (Jobs)C++ Builder (Language)C++ Builder (Language C++)C++ Builder (Compatibility with MFC)C++ Builder (Native API)C++ Builder (Non-Technical)C++ Builder (Students)C++ Builder (Third Party Tools)C++ Builder (Upgrade)C++ Builder (VCL)C++ Builder (VCL Components Usage)C++ Builder (VCL Components Development)C++ Builder (VCL Usage)C++ Builder (WinAPI)C++ Builder Installation Delphi Newsgroups----------------Delphi (General)Delphi ActiveX Controls UsageDelphi ActiveX Controls DevelopmentDelphi As400Delphi DatabasesDelphi Databases (ADO)Delphi Databases (dbExpress)Delphi Databases (Desktop)Delphi Databases (InterBase Express)Delphi Databases (Multi-Tier)Delphi Databases (SQL Servers)Delphi DeploymentDelphi GraphicsDelphi IDEDelphi InternationalizationDelphi InternetDelphi Internet Isapi-WebBrokerDelphi Internet WebSnapDelphi Internet WinsockDelphi JobsDelphi Language BASMDelphi Language ObjectPascalDelphi Model Driven Architecture (General)Delphi Model Driven Architecture (Third Party)Delphi MultimediaDelphi Native APIDelphi Non-TechnicalDelphi ObjectPascalDelphi OLE AutomationDelphi OO designDelphi OpenToolsAPIDelphi Reporting-ChartingDelphi RTLDelphi StudentsDelphi TeamSourceDelphi Thirdparty ToolsDelphi Thirdparty Tools (General)Delphi Thirdparty Tools (IntraWeb)Delphi Thirdparty Tools (RaveReports)Delphi UpgradeDelphi VCLDelphi VCL ComponentsDelphi VCL Components UsingDelphi VCL Components WritingDelphi WebServices SOAPDelphi WinAPIDelphi XMLDelphi Installationcomp.lang.pascal.delphi.components.misccomp.lang.pascal.delphi.components.usagecomp.lang.pascal.delphi.components.writingcomp.lang.pascal.delphi.databasescomp.lang.pascal.delphi.misccomp.sources.delphi JBuilder Newsgroups----------------JBuilderJBuilder AnnouncementsJBuilder Applet IssuesJBuilder As400JBuilder CompilerJBuilder CORBA/RMIJBuilder DatabasesJBuilder DB SwingJBuilder DebuggerJBuilder DeploymentJBuilder DocumentationJBuilder EnterpriseJBuilder HandheldJBuilder IDEJBuilder JavaJBuilder JavaAPIJBuilder Java LanguageJBuilder Java SwingJBuilder Java BeansJBuilder Java Beans UsageJBuilder Java Beans DevelopmentJBuilder JBCLJBuilder JDataStoreJBuilder JobsJBuilder LinuxJBuilder MacintoshJBuilder & MobileSetJBuilder MultiLingual AppsJBuilder Non-TechnicalJBuilder OpenToolsJBuilder Servlets (JSP)JBuilder StudentsJBuilder Team DevelopmentJBuilder Thirdparty ToolsJBuilder UpgradeJBuilder Installation InterBase Newsgroups----------------InterBaseInterBase Bug DiscussionInterBase GeneralInterBase IBConsoleInterBase OpenSourceInterBase ReplicationInterBase SQLInterBase ThirdpartyInterBase Installation Miscellaneous Borland Newsgroups----------------AppCenterAppServerEnteraVisiBroker  You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.