 |
BorlandTalk.com Borland discussion newsgroups
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Randall Parker Guest
|
Posted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 7:25 pm Post subject: Since another BCB release would be part of Delphi |
|
|
Folks, best case I see is that a Delphi rev in 2006 will have C++ support added into it.
Think about it. Borland probably is not going to release another stand-alone BCB. But
Borland just released a new version of Delphi. I doubt Borland will release a point
rev to Delphi 2005 that adds in C++ support. Though I suppose that is possible. It
just seems unlikely given Borland past practices.
My guess is that Borland will not want to release C++ support that does not include
..NET support. Since Borland isn't even working toward a BCB-Delphi release at this
point any work to add .NET support to C++ would have to start at some point in the
future and would take a while to do.
So I do not see a new dev tool for C++ with a VCL designer until 2006 at the earliest.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Leroy Casterline Guest
|
Posted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 10:36 pm Post subject: Re: Since another BCB release would be part of Delphi |
|
|
Randall Parker <STOPtechiepundit (AT) EVILfuturePOXpunditSPAM (DOT) com> wrote:
| Quote: | So I do not see a new dev tool for C++ with a VCL designer until 2006 at the earliest.
|
I think many of us would like to see something sooner, but given a
choice between getting BCB in 2006 and not getting it at all, 2006 works
for me.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeff Overcash (TeamB) Guest
|
Posted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 11:12 pm Post subject: Re: Since another BCB release would be part of Delphi |
|
|
Randall Parker wrote:
| Quote: |
Since Borland isn't even working toward a BCB-Delphi release at this
point any work to add .NET support to C++ would have to start at some point in the
future and would take a while to do.
|
Borland hasn't told the public what they are doing right now. You don't know
the above, it is strictly your opinion. As many pointed out there was a demo at
BorCon showing C++ in diamondback, so some work has indeed happened towards
this.
--
Jeff Overcash (TeamB)
(Please do not email me directly unless asked. Thank You)
A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher
a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build
a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act
alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer,
cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for
insects. (RAH)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Randall Parker Guest
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 12:28 am Post subject: Re: Since another BCB release would be part of Delphi |
|
|
Jeff Overcash (TeamB) wrote:
| Quote: | Borland hasn't told the public what they are doing right now. You don't know
the above, it is strictly your opinion. As many pointed out there was a demo at
BorCon showing C++ in diamondback, so some work has indeed happened towards
this.
|
Jeff,
No, it was reported here that Borland programmers did that demo and then stopped
further effort. C++ people are off working on a fix pak and a new release of BCBX.
They are not working on BCB.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gord Guest
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 1:05 am Post subject: Re: Since another BCB release would be part of Delphi |
|
|
Randall Parker wrote:
| Quote: | So I do not see a new dev tool for C++ with a VCL designer until 2006 at the earliest.
|
I hope you are wrong. If you are right, I think Borland will be toast in the C++ arena.
IMO Microsoft VS2005, with its renewed C++ vision, will look to most people as the only
option, furthering their stranglehold.
Also, it will be interesting to see what advances in the other alternatives (eg, QT etc.)
appear in 2005.
If you are right, another question I would have would be: If sometime in 2006 or 2007
Borland does a survey of their Borland Development Studio (or Delphi 2006 or whatever)
users, and find that hardly any of them are using it for C++, then do they drop C++? Or
will the tough work of integrating C++ have already been done so its no problem keeping in
BDS and upgrading?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Duane Hebert Guest
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:51 am Post subject: Re: Since another BCB release would be part of Delphi |
|
|
"Gord" <gp.mail.no.spam (AT) telus (DOT) no.spam.net> wrote
| Quote: | I hope you are wrong. If you are right, I think Borland will be toast in the C++ arena.
IMO Microsoft VS2005, with its renewed C++ vision, will look to most people as the only
option, furthering their stranglehold.
|
ditto.
| Quote: | Also, it will be interesting to see what advances in the other alternatives (eg, QT etc.)
appear in 2005.
Qt 4.0 is slated for release in Q1 2005. |
| Quote: | If you are right, another question I would have would be: If sometime in 2006 or 2007
Borland does a survey of their Borland Development Studio (or Delphi 2006 or whatever)
users, and find that hardly any of them are using it for C++, then do they drop C++? Or
will the tough work of integrating C++ have already been done so its no problem keeping in
BDS and upgrading?
|
It will depend solely on whether they think they can earn of profit of
10x. At least that seems to have been their reasoning in the past.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tamas Demjen Guest
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:27 pm Post subject: Re: Since another BCB release would be part of Delphi |
|
|
Unless Diamondback has a complete API for extensible language support,
like Visual Studio does. It's possible to add completely new .NET
languages to Visual Studio as plugins, and it's very well proven
already. If Diamondback has a similar an API (even an internal /
unpublished one), Borland could add C++ support sooner than we expect it.
I have serious doubts about that, but you never know.
Tom
Randall Parker wrote:
| Quote: | Folks, best case I see is that a Delphi rev in 2006 will have C++
support added into it.
Think about it. Borland probably is not going to release another
stand-alone BCB. But Borland just released a new version of Delphi. I
doubt Borland will release a point rev to Delphi 2005 that adds in C++
support. Though I suppose that is possible. It just seems unlikely given
Borland past practices.
My guess is that Borland will not want to release C++ support that does
not include .NET support. Since Borland isn't even working toward a
BCB-Delphi release at this point any work to add .NET support to C++
would have to start at some point in the future and would take a while
to do.
So I do not see a new dev tool for C++ with a VCL designer until 2006 at
the earliest.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Boian Mitov Guest
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:40 pm Post subject: Re: Since another BCB release would be part of Delphi |
|
|
Hi Tom,
It has such support. Indeed it even comes with Visual Basic plug in
installed. The Plug-Ins are called personalities, and the C++ Builder
personality was demonstrated during BorCon.
Boian
Tamas Demjen wrote:
| Quote: | Unless Diamondback has a complete API for extensible language support,
like Visual Studio does. It's possible to add completely new .NET
languages to Visual Studio as plugins, and it's very well proven
already. If Diamondback has a similar an API (even an internal /
unpublished one), Borland could add C++ support sooner than we expect it.
I have serious doubts about that, but you never know.
Tom
Randall Parker wrote:
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tamas Demjen Guest
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:30 pm Post subject: Re: Since another BCB release would be part of Delphi |
|
|
Hi Boian,
Thanks. It means they could theoretically release C++Builder for
Diamondback without having to develop a completely new IDE. So we may
not have to wait for Delphi 10.
Tom
Boian Mitov wrote:
| Quote: | Hi Tom,
It has such support. Indeed it even comes with Visual Basic plug in
installed. The Plug-Ins are called personalities, and the C++ Builder
personality was demonstrated during BorCon.
Boian
Tamas Demjen wrote:
Unless Diamondback has a complete API for extensible language support,
like Visual Studio does. It's possible to add completely new .NET
languages to Visual Studio as plugins, and it's very well proven
already. If Diamondback has a similar an API (even an internal /
unpublished one), Borland could add C++ support sooner than we expect it.
I have serious doubts about that, but you never know.
Tom
Randall Parker wrote:
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Boian Mitov Guest
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:57 pm Post subject: Re: Since another BCB release would be part of Delphi |
|
|
Hi Tom,
You can see the demo of BCB working inside Diamondback at
www.mitov.com . The pictures are crappy, but it was a pocket camera .
Boian
Tamas Demjen wrote:
| Quote: | Hi Boian,
Thanks. It means they could theoretically release C++Builder for
Diamondback without having to develop a completely new IDE. So we may
not have to wait for Delphi 10.
Tom
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kenneth de Camargo Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:08 am Post subject: Re: Since another BCB release would be part of Delphi |
|
|
Boian Mitov wrote:
| Quote: | You can see the demo of BCB working inside Diamondback at
www.mitov.com . The pictures are crappy, but it was a pocket camera
.
|
Next time, take the camera off the pocket.
<g,d&r>
--
Ken
http://planeta.terra.com.br/educacao/kencamargo/
* this is not a sig *
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:11 am Post subject: Re: Since another BCB release would be part of Delphi |
|
|
Kenneth de Camargo wrote:
| Quote: | Boian Mitov wrote:
You can see the demo of BCB working inside Diamondback at
www.mitov.com . The pictures are crappy, but it was a pocket camera
.
Next time, take the camera off the pocket.
g,d&r
|
He should have removed the plastic lens cap. <g>
--
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]
"Love is the answer - but while you're waiting for the answer sex
raises some pretty good questions." -- Woody Allen
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Boian Mitov Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:33 am Post subject: Re: Since another BCB release would be part of Delphi |
|
|
;-)
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] wrote:
| Quote: | Kenneth de Camargo wrote:
Next time, take the camera off the pocket.
g,d&r
He should have removed the plastic lens cap.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|