| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Remmy Guest
|
Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2006 12:03 am Post subject: Sleuth QA |
|
|
Hello!
One of the things I couldn't live without when I worked in D7 was the Sleuth
QA suite from the defunct Turbo Power (Rest in Peace in the heaven of the
programmers). Their Memory leaker analyzer (CodeWatch), their profiler
StopWatch, their CoverageAnalyst, their Stressing Testing Framework... all
were a must for any serious development. Unfortunatly, everybody knows what
happened to those great tools. I use them for D7 even today but unfortunatly
we are moving to 2006. With all the changes , the new memory manager, etc,
those great tools are now unusable. I have been looking under every possible
stone ato find some replacement tools for Sleuth but everything I find are
half-baked semifunctional pieces of ...software that don't come close to
Sleuth in any category.
If the Delphi market so uninteresting that no other company is interested in
taking the place of Turbo Power? What do you use for SERIOUS debugging? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rich Guest
|
Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2006 12:03 am Post subject: Re: Sleuth QA |
|
|
"Remmy" <remmy (AT) nospam (DOT) keeper.se> wrote in
news:44495f3e$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com:
| Quote: | Hello!
One of the things I couldn't live without when I worked in D7 was the
Sleuth QA suite from the defunct Turbo Power (Rest in Peace in the
heaven of the programmers). Their Memory leaker analyzer (CodeWatch),
their profiler StopWatch, their CoverageAnalyst, their Stressing
Testing Framework... all were a must for any serious development.
Unfortunatly, everybody knows what happened to those great tools. I
use them for D7 even today but unfortunatly we are moving to 2006.
With all the changes , the new memory manager, etc, those great tools
are now unusable. I have been looking under every possible stone ato
find some replacement tools for Sleuth but everything I find are
half-baked semifunctional pieces of ...software that don't come close
to Sleuth in any category.
If the Delphi market so uninteresting that no other company is
interested in taking the place of Turbo Power? What do you use for
SERIOUS debugging?
|
Well, you could have a look at the testing suite from AutomatedQA
(www.automatedqa.com). Their testing tool (TestComplete) and profiler
(AQTime) are top notch.
Then there are other products like EurekaLog (www.eurekalog.com) and
madExcept (www.madshi.net) for exception trapping. Both of these
products are also excellent and have loyal followings.
Other powerful debugging utilities include CodeSite (www.raize.com) and
SmartInspect (www.gurock.com).
I would give some of these tools a look if you haven't seen them already.
They are all serious applications used heavily by Delphi developers.
Several, such as AutomatedQA, existed at the time of TurboPower and were
direct competitors to the now-defunct SleuthQA.
HTH
Rich |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hannes Danzl[NDD] Guest
|
Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2006 4:03 am Post subject: Re: Sleuth QA |
|
|
| Quote: | If the Delphi market so uninteresting that no other company is interested in
taking the place of Turbo Power? What do you use for SERIOUS debugging?
|
That's not true actually. We have been/are still trying to get the rights to
get Sleuth back on the market, but it's very very difficult due to the fact
that no one at Aristocrat is responsible or interested in that.
Another question is if it would be feasible to pay for getting the rights. How
many people would there be who would buy it?
--
Hannes Danzl [NexusDB Developer]
Newsgroup archive at http://www.tamaracka.com/search.htm |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Günter Kieninger Guest
|
Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2006 7:03 am Post subject: Re: Sleuth QA |
|
|
In article <xn0ela9df13557e005 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com>, Hannes Danzl[NDD] wrote:
| Quote: | Another question is if it would be feasible to pay for getting the rights. How
many people would there be who would buy it?
|
I paid for it and would do it again.
Gruß aus den Bergen
Günter |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ed Blanchard Guest
|
Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2006 9:03 am Post subject: Re: Sleuth QA |
|
|
In article <xn0ela9df13557e005 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com>,
hannes (AT) nexusdb (DOT) dbnexus.com says...
| Quote: | If the Delphi market so uninteresting that no other company is interested in
taking the place of Turbo Power? What do you use for SERIOUS debugging?
That's not true actually. We have been/are still trying to get the rights to
get Sleuth back on the market, but it's very very difficult due to the fact
that no one at Aristocrat is responsible or interested in that.
Another question is if it would be feasible to pay for getting the rights. How
many people would there be who would buy it?
|
<Hand raised>
EdB |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hannes Danzl[NDD] Guest
|
Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2006 10:03 am Post subject: Re: Sleuth QA |
|
|
Günter Kieninger wrote:
| Quote: | In article <xn0ela9df13557e005 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com>, Hannes Danzl[NDD]
wrote:
Another question is if it would be feasible to pay for getting the rights.
How many people would there be who would buy it?
I paid for it and would do it again.
|
The question was more rhetorical, but hey, thanks!
--
Hannes Danzl [NexusDB Developer]
Newsgroup archive at http://www.tamaracka.com/search.htm |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dennis Landi Guest
|
Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2006 1:03 pm Post subject: Re: Sleuth QA |
|
|
Hannes Danzl[NDD] wrote:
| Quote: | If the Delphi market so uninteresting that no other company is interested in
taking the place of Turbo Power? What do you use for SERIOUS debugging?
That's not true actually. We have been/are still trying to get the rights to
get Sleuth back on the market, but it's very very difficult due to the fact
that no one at Aristocrat is responsible or interested in that.
Another question is if it would be feasible to pay for getting the rights. How
many people would there be who would buy it?
|
I'd buy it. But obviously the more time goes by the more likely users
who have moved on passed D7 have found other solutions.
-d |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Olivier Beltrami Guest
|
Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2006 2:03 pm Post subject: Re: Sleuth QA |
|
|
| Quote: | If the Delphi market so uninteresting that no other company is interested
in taking the place of Turbo Power? What do you use for SERIOUS debugging?
|
Delphi 7 and Sleuth QA ;-)
Olivier |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Charles Appel Guest
|
Posted: Sun Apr 23, 2006 8:05 pm Post subject: Re: Sleuth QA |
|
|
"Remmy" <remmy (AT) nospam (DOT) keeper.se> wrote in message
news:44495f3e$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
| Quote: | If the Delphi market so uninteresting that no other company is interested
in taking the place of Turbo Power? What do you use for SERIOUS debugging?
|
AQTime works well.
http://www.automatedqa.com/products/aqtime/index.asp
--
Charles Appel
http://charlesappel.home.mindspring.com/
Home of Chuck's Poker Libraries for Delphi,
Chuck's Video Poker and Chuck's Toys |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paul Dolen Guest
|
Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 3:03 pm Post subject: Re: Sleuth QA |
|
|
| Quote: | That's not true actually. We have been/are still trying to get the rights to
get Sleuth back on the market, but it's very very difficult due to the fact
that no one at Aristocrat is responsible or interested in that.
|
Its amazing how often people aren't interested in free money. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dimitris Guest
|
Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 10:03 pm Post subject: Re: Sleuth QA |
|
|
"Gunter Kieninger" <g.kieninger (AT) mgm (DOT) at> wrote in message
news:VA.00000425.17b7b58b (AT) mgm (DOT) at...
| Quote: | In article <xn0ela9df13557e005 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com>, Hannes Danzl[NDD]
wrote:
Another question is if it would be feasible to pay for getting the
rights. How
many people would there be who would buy it?
I paid for it and would do it again.
|
me too |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark Anthony Gohara Guest
|
Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 11:03 pm Post subject: Re: Sleuth QA |
|
|
I don't know how free that money is figuring all the licensing and legal
issues surrounding that code.
"Paul Dolen" <nospam (AT) nowhere (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:3kop42t4vr1h947deqmm3glsra33nu6ob8 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
| Quote: | That's not true actually. We have been/are still trying to get the rights
to
get Sleuth back on the market, but it's very very difficult due to the
fact
that no one at Aristocrat is responsible or interested in that.
Its amazing how often people aren't interested in free money. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hannes Danzl[NDD] Guest
|
Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 1:03 am Post subject: Re: Sleuth QA |
|
|
Mark Anthony Gohara wrote:
| Quote: | I don't know how free that money is figuring all the licensing and legal
issues surrounding that code.
|
It would be very easy since the original author is working with us :)
--
Hannes Danzl [NexusDB Developer]
Newsgroup archive at http://www.tamaracka.com/search.htm |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark Anthony Gohara Guest
|
Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 4:04 pm Post subject: Re: Sleuth QA |
|
|
I talked to Per yesterday about it because it is interesting but even he
said the rights and licensing are an issue.
"Hannes Danzl[NDD]" <hannes (AT) nexusdb (DOT) dbnexus.com> wrote in message
news:xn0elebzltw7q3000 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
| Quote: | Mark Anthony Gohara wrote:
I don't know how free that money is figuring all the licensing and legal
issues surrounding that code.
It would be very easy since the original author is working with us :)
--
Hannes Danzl [NexusDB Developer]
Newsgroup archive at http://www.tamaracka.com/search.htm |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|