BorlandTalk.com

Dejan · Guest

http://www.spamcannibal.org/cannibal.cgi

there is stuff to kill spam (DOS for incomming spam server), Michael have
writen it for linux (I agree, this should be dangerous but we need to fight
them).

I'm not too familiar with socket programming, how can be hard to implement
something that in indy ?

Dejan · Guest

nope, I want this on smtp server and I already have all to fight spam (dsbl
servers, TIdDNSResolver, ...), already have writen lot of code for server
(same of this is used on page http://spamblock.ztbclan.com/ ) now I want
windows version of already exists code to be added in indy.

Michael have writen code for linux and he want to help (he should made all
needed code for kylix version) but this can add only indy team because need
to be writen in the TDI layer for windows and in ETH layer for linux.

I have mail server full logs of continous tryes to delivery spam from same
ip addresses in 2 min intervals, we just need to fight spam hard.

I hope some indy team members reading this group :)

"Rhys Sage" <No.Spam@ta> wrote

Charles Stack · Guest

DNS resolution and Black List services may not work correctly due to recent
changes by VeriSign with their wild cards (which now resolve EVERY address)
and the fact that some relay black lists have been shut down due to DDOS
attacks against them.

Best solution I have found is Bayes filtering systems (i.e.POPFile) coupled
with additonal heuristic rules at the client level.. DSPAM (a linux
program) works well at the server level. Bayes filters, once trained, will
nab about 99% of SPAM.

Charles