BorlandTalk.com Forum Index BorlandTalk.com
Borland discussion newsgroups
 
Archives   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

SQL 2005
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BorlandTalk.com Forum Index -> Delphi Non-Technical
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Phil Barber
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 12:02 am    Post subject: SQL 2005 Reply with quote



I recently attended a VS2005 road show, they talked about how in SQL 2005
the CLR is now supported in stored procedures and triggers. it looks like it
has real possibilities. the guy created a stored procedure from within the
IDE which had C# classes and procedures right in the stored proc code. He
went on to say the Delphi.Net would support this as well. I was wondering if
anyone has heard if Borland will have this feature in the next version of
Delphi?
Phil.


Back to top
Dan Palley
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 12:11 am    Post subject: Re: SQL 2005 Reply with quote



"Phil Barber" <pbarber1 (AT) houston (DOT) rr.com> wrote

Quote:
I recently attended a VS2005 road show, they talked about how in SQL 2005
the CLR is now supported in stored procedures and triggers. it looks like
it has real possibilities. the guy created a stored procedure from within
the IDE which had C# classes and procedures right in the stored proc code.
He went on to say the Delphi.Net would support this as well. I was
wondering if anyone has heard if Borland will have this feature in the next
version of Delphi?

I don't think anything in Delphi needs to be done except maybe support Net
2.0, which is already planned, I believe.

Was the presenter Euan Gardner, by any chance?

Dan



Back to top
Dave Nottage [TeamB]
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 12:25 am    Post subject: Re: SQL 2005 Reply with quote



Dan Palley wrote:

Quote:
Was the presenter Euan Gardner, by any chance?

I believe you mean Euan Garden <g>

--
Dave Nottage [TeamB]

Back to top
Phil Barber
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 12:31 am    Post subject: Re: SQL 2005 Reply with quote


"> I don't think anything in Delphi needs to be done except maybe support
Net
Quote:
2.0, which is already planned, I believe.

Was the presenter Euan Gardner, by any chance?

Dan

I did not jot his name down and I do not recall it.
Don't you think they would have to enchance the database explorer quite a
bit?
I mean you would need the ability to add/edit Sp's and triggers.
Phil



Back to top
Dan Palley
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 12:32 am    Post subject: Re: SQL 2005 Reply with quote

"Dave Nottage [TeamB]" <davidn (AT) n0sp4m (DOT) please.radsoft.com.au> wrote in
message news:42c33bde$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
Quote:
Dan Palley wrote:

Was the presenter Euan Gardner, by any chance?

I believe you mean Euan Garden

Yes, thanks. My apologies to Mr. Garden.

Dan



Back to top
Dan Palley
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 1:32 am    Post subject: Re: SQL 2005 Reply with quote

"Phil Barber" <pbarber1 (AT) houston (DOT) rr.com> wrote

Quote:

"> I don't think anything in Delphi needs to be done except maybe support
Net
2.0, which is already planned, I believe.

Was the presenter Euan Gardner, by any chance?

Dan

I did not jot his name down and I do not recall it.
Don't you think they would have to enchance the database explorer quite a
bit?
I mean you would need the ability to add/edit Sp's and triggers.

Well, I would imagine you would write and compile the code in Delphi and
then integrate the compiled units into SQL Server using their admin tools.

I agree that having that level of integration in the database explorer would
be nice, but it in no way prevents you from creating the triggers and SP's
in Delphi.

Dan



Back to top
Wayne Niddery [TeamB]
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 3:05 am    Post subject: Re: SQL 2005 Reply with quote

Phil Barber wrote:
Quote:
I recently attended a VS2005 road show, they talked about how in SQL
2005 the CLR is now supported in stored procedures and triggers. it
looks like it has real possibilities. the guy created a stored
procedure from within the IDE which had C# classes and procedures
right in the stored proc code. He went on to say the Delphi.Net would
support this as well. I was wondering if anyone has heard if Borland
will have this feature in the next version of Delphi?

This was shown at last year's BorCon using Delphi.

--
Wayne Niddery - Logic Fundamentals, Inc. (www.logicfundamentals.com)
RADBooks: http://www.logicfundamentals.com/RADBooks.html
SpaceShipOne; GovernmentZero



Back to top
John Kaster (Borland)
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 4:06 am    Post subject: Re: SQL 2005 Reply with quote

Phil Barber wrote:

Quote:
I was wondering if anyone has heard if Borland will have this feature
in the next version of Delphi?

This has already been demonstrated at BorCon last year. Also,
NDataStore (working name), the version of JDataStore for .NET, has
support for Delphi/C#/<your favorite .NET language> stored procedures
as well, and was demonstrated last year at BorCon. Hopefully, it will
be released by this year's DevCon ;)

--
John Kaster http://blogs.borland.com/johnk
Features and bugs: http://qc.borland.com
Get source: http://cc.borland.com
If it's not here, it's not happening: http://ec.borland.com

Back to top
Deepak Shenoy (TeamB)
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 5:36 am    Post subject: Re: SQL 2005 Reply with quote

Dan Palley wrote:

Quote:
I don't think anything in Delphi needs to be done except maybe
support Net 2.0, which is already planned, I believe.

I'm not sure about this, but perhaps the IDE will need to be modified
to support some of the SQL Server 2005 features. There's a different
sandbox for the stored procedures, and the code insight etc. would
probably need to take that into consideration.

But then this is not yet the final avatar of SQL Server 2005 - still
beta 2 IIRC. There might be more architectural changes.


--
Deepak Shenoy (TeamB)
Agni Software (http://www.agnisoft.com)
Blog: http://shenoyatwork.blogspot.com

Back to top
Kyle A. Miller
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 6:25 am    Post subject: Re: SQL 2005 Reply with quote

Phil Barber wrote:
Quote:
I recently attended a VS2005 road show, they talked about how in SQL 2005
the CLR is now supported in stored procedures and triggers. it looks like it
has real possibilities.

I saw SQL Anywhere do this with Java many, many moons ago. It didn't
seem to catch on. With Microsoft's approval, it might get noticed now.

Back to top
James K Smith
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 6:48 am    Post subject: Re: SQL 2005 Reply with quote

What kind of advantage would this provide over extended stored procedures?


"Phil Barber" <pbarber1 (AT) houston (DOT) rr.com> wrote

Quote:
I recently attended a VS2005 road show, they talked about how in SQL 2005
the CLR is now supported in stored procedures and triggers. it looks like
it
has real possibilities. the guy created a stored procedure from within
the
IDE which had C# classes and procedures right in the stored proc code. He
went on to say the Delphi.Net would support this as well. I was wondering
if
anyone has heard if Borland will have this feature in the next version of
Delphi?
Phil.





Back to top
Oliver Townshend
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:20 am    Post subject: Re: SQL 2005 Reply with quote

Quote:
What kind of advantage would this provide over extended stored procedures?

Maybe it will only allow managed code, reducing the chance of errors and
memory leaks.

Oliver Townshend



Back to top
Craig Stuntz [TeamB]
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 2:01 pm    Post subject: Re: SQL 2005 Reply with quote

Oliver Townshend wrote:

Quote:
Maybe it will only allow managed code, reducing the chance of errors
and memory leaks.

It's not just memory leaks you need to worry about. Even just
allocating memory in a non-ideal way can negatively impact your server:

http://blogs.msdn.com/khen1234/archive/2005/05/08/415501.aspx

Using the CLR lets SQL Server itself handle the memory allocations.

There are also large security issues with xprocs.

--
Craig Stuntz [TeamB] . Vertex Systems Corp. . Columbus, OH
Delphi/InterBase Weblog : http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz
How to ask questions the smart way:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Back to top
Mike Swaim
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 2:23 pm    Post subject: Re: SQL 2005 Reply with quote

James K Smith wrote:

Quote:
What kind of advantage would this provide over extended stored
procedures?

In the example I saw, they accessed the file system. There are also
some things that I find a lot easier to do in a procedural language
than SQL, like parsing strings.

--
Mike Swaim [email]swaim (AT) hal-pc (DOT) org[/email] at home | Quote: "Boingie"^4 Y,W & D
MD Anderson Dept. of Biostatistics & Applied Mathematics
[email]mpswaim (AT) mdanderson (DOT) org[/email] or [email]mswaim (AT) odin (DOT) mdacc.tmc.edu[/email] at work
ICBM: 29.763N 95.363W|Disclaimer: Yeah, like I speak for MD Anderson.

Back to top
James K Smith
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 3:47 pm    Post subject: Re: SQL 2005 Reply with quote

You can use dlls with extended stored.

"Mike Swaim" <mswaim (AT) odin (DOT) mdacc.tmc.edu> wrote

Quote:
James K Smith wrote:

What kind of advantage would this provide over extended stored
procedures?

In the example I saw, they accessed the file system. There are also
some things that I find a lot easier to do in a procedural language
than SQL, like parsing strings.

--
Mike Swaim [email]swaim (AT) hal-pc (DOT) org[/email] at home | Quote: "Boingie"^4 Y,W & D
MD Anderson Dept. of Biostatistics & Applied Mathematics
[email]mpswaim (AT) mdanderson (DOT) org[/email] or [email]mswaim (AT) odin (DOT) mdacc.tmc.edu[/email] at work
ICBM: 29.763N 95.363W|Disclaimer: Yeah, like I speak for MD Anderson.



Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BorlandTalk.com Forum Index -> Delphi Non-Technical All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group
SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.