| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Sandeep Chandra
Guest
|
 Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 1:50 pm Post subject: Standalone vs IIS deployment |
 |
|
I am expecting the load to be quite high on the website I will be
deploying. I was just wondering which method of deployment (Standalone
or on IIS) is better?
Regards
Sandeep |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joel
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 6:27 pm Post subject: Re: Standalone vs IIS deployment |
|
|
It depends. For performance stand alone is better (run as a service). But
IIS can help so that you can run everything under the same port (80).
(Although you could go the Ocatgate route for this.)
Joel
"Sandeep Chandra" <sandeep_c24 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:463850d1$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
| Quote: | I am expecting the load to be quite high on the website I will be
deploying. I was just wondering which method of deployment (Standalone or
on IIS) is better?
Regards
Sandeep |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dag Fjeld Edvardsen
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 5:20 pm Post subject: Re: Standalone vs IIS deployment |
|
|
Are there any great benefits of running as a service compared to running
the standalone as an oridnary application ?
"Joel" <nowhere (AT) nowhere (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:463891c2$2 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
| Quote: | It depends. For performance stand alone is better (run as a service).
But IIS can help so that you can run everything under the same port (80).
(Although you could go the Ocatgate route for this.)
Joel
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Farshad
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 6:26 pm Post subject: Re: Standalone vs IIS deployment |
|
|
The main benefit is that a service automatically starts when windows starts
but a normal app can only be started when a user login is done.
"Dag Fjeld Edvardsen" <dfe who is located on byggforsk dot no> wrote in
message news:4639d362 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
| Quote: | Are there any great benefits of running as a service compared to running
the standalone as an oridnary application ? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joel
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 6:48 pm Post subject: Re: Standalone vs IIS deployment |
|
|
Yes.
The rule is develope with an exe run as a service. (A service will run when
no one is logged on.)
You can use the same file and compile it both ways.
Joel
"Dag Fjeld Edvardsen" <dfe who is located on byggforsk dot no> wrote in
message news:4639d362 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
| Quote: | Are there any great benefits of running as a service compared to running
the standalone as an oridnary application ?
"Joel" <nowhere (AT) nowhere (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:463891c2$2 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
It depends. For performance stand alone is better (run as a service).
But IIS can help so that you can run everything under the same port (80).
(Although you could go the Ocatgate route for this.)
Joel
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
