 |
BorlandTalk.com Borland discussion newsgroups
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Mike Collins Guest
|
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2003 11:27 pm Post subject: The truth is out there |
|
|
Please excuse me for any miss giving that I may have here (I've been away
from my computer for two weeks) BUT surely it is obvious that the new
CBuilderX doesn't support VCL based development!
If it did then Borland would simply state so (or TeamB would) and stop
everyone fighting! I can only conclude that the lack of response and the
absence of a date for the mystical 'open-letter' suggests that it doesn't,
although I suspect that this letter will suggest some degree of support in
the future blah, blah, blah.
I'm (like many others here) totally confused about this one (as I mentioned
I've been away) but is it proposed that CBuilderX will form a replacement /
supersede C++Builder 6? If this is the case I will be most sad - in fact I
think I will defiantly pack this all in and change carrier - life just
wouldn't be the same without Builder, the VCL's and design-time form
development (and Delphi smells).
Alas I hope Borland hasn't abandoned all those trust developers (who have
been paying £1500+ every year for there enterprise editions but their
lack of response speaks volume here!!!!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gillmer J. Derge (TeamB) Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2003 12:45 am Post subject: Re: The truth is out there |
|
|
"Mike Collins" <mikec (AT) kr8 (DOT) co.uk> wrote
| Quote: | Please excuse me for any miss giving that I may have here (I've been
away
from my computer for two weeks) BUT surely it is obvious that the new
CBuilderX doesn't support VCL based development!
|
The question isn't whether CBX does or doesn't support VCL development.
It's whether it will or won't support it in the future.
Like you said, the answer to, "Does CBX support VCL based development,"
is obvious. It doesn't. At least not in the way you probably mean.
You can compile VCL code, you can edit VCL code, but there's no support
for visual development like you've come to expect from the RAD tools
like BCB and Delphi.
The more interesting question is what kind of support for VCL based
development CBX will have in the future. Will there be a translation
tool that converts your VCL code to the new wxWindows framework? Will
there be a portability layer that maps VCL calls to wxWindows? Will
they take the framework-agnostic visual design platform and add support
for VCL in addition to support for wxWindows? Will they just drop VCL
entirely? Will they do something else?
At this point we don't know those answers. That's part of what the two
open letters should address.
--
Gillmer J. Derge (TeamB)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Larry Johnson Guest
|
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2003 3:44 am Post subject: Re: The truth is out there |
|
|
So CBX doesn't support VCL so what. Isn't Borland going to replace VCL with
something else. Don't they just have some new version of VCL named ??? They
have to replace VCL with something because there is no other reason to use
Borland compilers. What are they going to do tell all the programmers who
use their compilers to program in raw APIs like animals:) By the way is the
new CBX going to support the AMD-64 chip set?
regards.
"Gillmer J. Derge (TeamB)" <spam (AT) gillmerderge (DOT) com> wrote
| Quote: | "Mike Collins" <mikec (AT) kr8 (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:3f7cb034$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
Please excuse me for any miss giving that I may have here (I've been
away
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Remy Lebeau (TeamB) Guest
|
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2003 4:12 am Post subject: Re: The truth is out there |
|
|
"Larry Johnson" <Johnson222 (AT) ev1 (DOT) net> wrote
| Quote: | So CBX doesn't support VCL so what.
|
It is a big deal for a lot of people who will want to maintain existing
projects using the new IDE.
| Quote: | Isn't Borland going to replace VCL with something else.
|
What makes you think that?
The truth is, nobody knows what Borland is going to do with VCL, whether
support it or chuck it. Borland hasn't said a peep about it one way or
another yet. That information is not expected to be released for another
week or so.
| Quote: | Don't they just have some new version of VCL named ???
|
Not for C++, no. Delphi's VCL is being ported to .NET, though.
| Quote: | They have to replace VCL with something
|
Says who?
| Quote: | because there is no other reason to use Borland compilers.
|
Excuse me???? What is that supposed to mean? Even without the VCL, Borland
has a good compiler. Borland was making compilers long before VCL was every
conceived let alone implemented. And Borland is continuing to create
compilers. CBX includes a preview of a brand new C++ compiler, with a
full-blown version on the horizon.
Gambit
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeff Weir Guest
|
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2003 1:52 pm Post subject: Re: The truth is out there |
|
|
Remy Lebeau (TeamB) wrote:
| Quote: |
The truth is, nobody knows what Borland is going to do with VCL, whether
support it or chuck it. Borland hasn't said a peep about it one way or
another yet. That information is not expected to be released for another
week or so.
|
From the Octane Q & A on bdn.borland.com:
<quote>
DelphiTM and Borland® C++Builder®, and the Borland commitment to this
development community has not changed. Borland believes that there are
still many more Win32 Delphi applications yet to be built and plans to
support and update the Win32 Delphi technology for the foreseeable
future. The Win32 Delphi compiler will receive new language features to
increase source code compatibility with .NET, and the VCL for Win32 will
also be updated.
</quote>
It still doesn't say C++Builder will be updated to support the updated
VCL but it does give us faint hope doesn't it?
regards,
jeff
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Remy Lebeau (TeamB) Guest
|
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2003 8:04 pm Post subject: Re: The truth is out there |
|
|
"Jeff Weir" <jeffwnos (AT) pamcanscale (DOT) com> wrote
| Quote: | From the Octane Q & A on bdn.borland.com:
|
I'm aware of that letter. Octane applies to Delphi, not C++Builder. The
two are not the same.
| Quote: | It still doesn't say C++Builder will be updated to support
the updated VCL but it does give us faint hope doesn't it?
|
C++Builder, as you think of it, is no longer. BCB6 is the last of its kind
for that type of IDE. Borland is already committed that CBX is the next C++
product. And if you re-read what I and many others have already stated
earlier, information from Borland regarding VCL's future in CBX is
forthcoming shortly.
Gambit
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ken de Camargo Jr. [*TTFK Guest
|
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2003 9:04 pm Post subject: Re: The truth is out there |
|
|
Jeff Weir wrote:
| Quote: | It still doesn't say C++Builder will be updated to support the
updated VCL but it does give us faint hope doesn't it?
|
Nope. Don't hold your breath.
--
Ken [*The Team Formerly Known As D]
MoNBH/MDNPEI
http://planeta.terra.com.br/educacao/kencamargo/
Hey! Someone left a tagline here:
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeff Weir Guest
|
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2003 3:19 pm Post subject: Re: The truth is out there |
|
|
Remy Lebeau (TeamB) wrote:
| Quote: |
I'm aware of that letter. Octane applies to Delphi, not C++Builder. The
two are not the same.
|
Thanks for the heads up, buddy. Your reply is so insightful. The letter
I read does make reference to C++Builder though.
| Quote: |
C++Builder, as you think of it, is no longer. BCB6 is the last of its kind
for that type of IDE. Borland is already committed that CBX is the next C++
product. And if you re-read what I and many others have already stated
earlier, information from Borland regarding VCL's future in CBX is
forthcoming shortly.
|
Your insight is so refreshing - and blah, blah, blah. You've said it all
before. I've seen it over and over and over again. Thanks for taking the
time to reply though - not. Anyway...
Can you tell me why Borland even mentions C++Builder in the Octane Q &
A? It says "There are now over 2 million active Win32 developers between
Borland® DelphiTM and Borland® C++Builder®, and the Borland commitment
to this development community has not changed". And then in the same
paragraph we are told how the VCL (which has always been written in
OP/Delphi) will be updated.
Why mention C++Builder in a Octane Q & A at all? Was it just a slip of
the keyboard? Why does it take weeks and weeks to draft these letters if
such an obvious mistake can be made?
Yes, CBX is not C++Builder. Yeah, VCL users may never have a 100%
Standard C++ compiler. So what. And isn't that what CBX is for anyway.
You want use the VCL - great - just stop asking for boost and loki and
ACE and better template support and so on.
regards,
jeff
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|