 |
BorlandTalk.com Borland discussion newsgroups
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Mark Thorogood Guest
|
Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2004 10:22 am Post subject: Time for me to move away from Paradox? |
|
|
Hi
We have been using Paradox (with much success) as our main database for
desktop based applications for around 7 years. I now feel it is time to move
to another format due to depreciated BDE and general lack of further
development.
I am interested in others opinions regarding the suitability of the
following as a replacement:
1. Advantage Local Server - This appears free (cannot complain about that!)
and has a server edition that is useful if application requires it (although
we tend to use MSDE where we need to support a small number of concurrent
users, and would generally prefer MS SQL Server for greater numbers).
2. DBISAM - cost involved, Delphi Informant 2004 Best Database Engine Award.
3. NexusDB - Just released a free version of their Embedded Single user
edition (not crippled in any way), I am very interested in their
developments regarding an ADO Provider which should operate within the
Compact Framework (we do quite a bit of development on PDAs).
Regards
Mark Thorogood - Managing Director/Senior Developer, Thorogood Software
Limited
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Frank Marousek Guest
|
Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2004 1:54 pm Post subject: Re: Time for me to move away from Paradox? |
|
|
Hi Mark,
I recently replaced Paradox with Advantage Local Server in one of my
applications with no problems. It was a relatively painless transition.
Please ask if you have specific questions/issues you're concerned about.
Frank
--
"Mark Thorogood" <mark (AT) thorogoodsoftware (DOT) co.uk> wrote
| Quote: | Hi
We have been using Paradox (with much success) as our main database for
desktop based applications for around 7 years. I now feel it is time to
move
to another format due to depreciated BDE and general lack of further
development.
I am interested in others opinions regarding the suitability of the
following as a replacement:
1. Advantage Local Server - This appears free (cannot complain about
that!)
and has a server edition that is useful if application requires it
(although
we tend to use MSDE where we need to support a small number of concurrent
users, and would generally prefer MS SQL Server for greater numbers).
2. DBISAM - cost involved, Delphi Informant 2004 Best Database Engine
Award.
3. NexusDB - Just released a free version of their Embedded Single user
edition (not crippled in any way), I am very interested in their
developments regarding an ADO Provider which should operate within the
Compact Framework (we do quite a bit of development on PDAs).
Regards
Mark Thorogood - Managing Director/Senior Developer, Thorogood Software
Limited
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ken Brumback Guest
|
Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:03 pm Post subject: Re: Time for me to move away from Paradox? |
|
|
Mark,
You will be well served by moving to Advantage. I use the product in a
client/server and local mode (Yes, local server is free) with great success.
Extended Systems has some white papers detailing their product along MS SQL
server.
http://resolution.extendedsystems.com/ADS/Product+Detail/_FAQs+and+Data+Sheets.htm -
Pick: "Advantage Database Server or Microsoft SQL Server: Which One is Right
for You?"
Also see:
http://resolution.extendedsystems.com/ADS/Success+Stories/_Case+Studies.htm
ESI also has training for Advantage from their tech support and R&D folks a
few times a year in Boise, ID. I've been three times and it was well worth
it. They also have an ADO provider.
Ken Brumback
INS, Inc.
Borland Delphi Certified Developer
"Mark Thorogood" <mark (AT) thorogoodsoftware (DOT) co.uk> wrote
| Quote: | Hi
We have been using Paradox (with much success) as our main database for
desktop based applications for around 7 years. I now feel it is time to
move to another format due to depreciated BDE and general lack of further
development.
I am interested in others opinions regarding the suitability of the
following as a replacement:
1. Advantage Local Server - This appears free (cannot complain about
that!) and has a server edition that is useful if application requires it
(although we tend to use MSDE where we need to support a small number of
concurrent users, and would generally prefer MS SQL Server for greater
numbers).
2. DBISAM - cost involved, Delphi Informant 2004 Best Database Engine
Award.
3. NexusDB - Just released a free version of their Embedded Single user
edition (not crippled in any way), I am very interested in their
developments regarding an ADO Provider which should operate within the
Compact Framework (we do quite a bit of development on PDAs).
Regards
Mark Thorogood - Managing Director/Senior Developer, Thorogood Software
Limited
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark Thorogood Guest
|
Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:24 pm Post subject: Re: Time for me to move away from Paradox? |
|
|
Thanks for both responses.
I am currently appraising the Advantage product using ADO, will get to
others in due course.
2 votes for Advantage then.
Regards
Mark Thorogood
"Ken Brumback" <kbrumback (AT) arl (DOT) i-n-s.com> wrote
| Quote: | Mark,
You will be well served by moving to Advantage. I use the product in a
client/server and local mode (Yes, local server is free) with great
success.
Extended Systems has some white papers detailing their product along MS
SQL server.
http://resolution.extendedsystems.com/ADS/Product+Detail/_FAQs+and+Data+Sheets.htm -
Pick: "Advantage Database Server or Microsoft SQL Server: Which One is
Right for You?"
Also see:
http://resolution.extendedsystems.com/ADS/Success+Stories/_Case+Studies.htm
ESI also has training for Advantage from their tech support and R&D folks
a few times a year in Boise, ID. I've been three times and it was well
worth it. They also have an ADO provider.
Ken Brumback
INS, Inc.
Borland Delphi Certified Developer
"Mark Thorogood" <mark (AT) thorogoodsoftware (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:41875fff (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
Hi
We have been using Paradox (with much success) as our main database for
desktop based applications for around 7 years. I now feel it is time to
move to another format due to depreciated BDE and general lack of further
development.
I am interested in others opinions regarding the suitability of the
following as a replacement:
1. Advantage Local Server - This appears free (cannot complain about
that!) and has a server edition that is useful if application requires it
(although we tend to use MSDE where we need to support a small number of
concurrent users, and would generally prefer MS SQL Server for greater
numbers).
2. DBISAM - cost involved, Delphi Informant 2004 Best Database Engine
Award.
3. NexusDB - Just released a free version of their Embedded Single user
edition (not crippled in any way), I am very interested in their
developments regarding an ADO Provider which should operate within the
Compact Framework (we do quite a bit of development on PDAs).
Regards
Mark Thorogood - Managing Director/Senior Developer, Thorogood Software
Limited
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Don Gollahon Guest
|
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:41 am Post subject: Re: Time for me to move away from Paradox? |
|
|
I would suggest Firebird, www.ibphoenix.com. Excellent database.
Open-source. Easy to use. FAST. I've migrated most of my work to it.
--
_________________________________________
Don Gollahon
[email]dlgllhn (AT) InHisStepsSoftware (DOT) com[/email]
ICQ#: 115831669
"What in Eternity does it matter?"
_________________________________________
"Mark Thorogood" <mark (AT) thorogoodsoftware (DOT) co.uk> wrote
| Quote: | Hi
We have been using Paradox (with much success) as our main database for
desktop based applications for around 7 years. I now feel it is time to
move to another format due to depreciated BDE and general lack of further
development.
I am interested in others opinions regarding the suitability of the
following as a replacement:
1. Advantage Local Server - This appears free (cannot complain about
that!) and has a server edition that is useful if application requires it
(although we tend to use MSDE where we need to support a small number of
concurrent users, and would generally prefer MS SQL Server for greater
numbers).
2. DBISAM - cost involved, Delphi Informant 2004 Best Database Engine
Award.
3. NexusDB - Just released a free version of their Embedded Single user
edition (not crippled in any way), I am very interested in their
developments regarding an ADO Provider which should operate within the
Compact Framework (we do quite a bit of development on PDAs).
Regards
Mark Thorogood - Managing Director/Senior Developer, Thorogood Software
Limited
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bill Todd Guest
|
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 8:27 pm Post subject: Re: Time for me to move away from Paradox? |
|
|
The problem with Firebird and any other SQL database server is you have
to make a lot of changes to most Paradox apps to get good performance
with a SQL database server. Advantange, on the other hand, mimics
Paradox's navigational architecture so there is much less conversion
effort.
--
Bill (TeamB)
TeamB cannot answer questions received via email
Don Gollahon wrote:
| Quote: | I would suggest Firebird, www.ibphoenix.com. Excellent database.
Open-source. Easy to use. FAST. I've migrated most of my work to
it.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hüseyin Aliz Guest
|
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:36 pm Post subject: Re: Time for me to move away from Paradox? |
|
|
DBISAM :)
"Bruno Lovatti" <blovatti(remove this)@terra.com.br> wrote
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Don Gollahon Guest
|
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2004 4:12 am Post subject: Re: Time for me to move away from Paradox? |
|
|
"Bill Todd" <no (AT) no (DOT) com> wrote
| Quote: | The problem with Firebird and any other SQL database server is you have
to make a lot of changes to most Paradox apps to get good performance
|
Not that hard, really. I use IBObjects. Most things converted with simple
search and replace of the objects. The database can be fine-tuned later as
one learns to use stored procedures and triggers where appropriate.
| Quote: | with a SQL database server. Advantange, on the other hand, mimics
Paradox's navigational architecture so there is much less conversion
effort.
--
Bill (TeamB)
TeamB cannot answer questions received via email
|
--
_________________________________________
Don Gollahon
[email]dlgllhn (AT) InHisStepsSoftware (DOT) com[/email]
ICQ#: 115831669
"What in Eternity does it matter?"
_________________________________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bill Todd Guest
|
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2004 1:30 pm Post subject: Re: Time for me to move away from Paradox? |
|
|
Did your Paradox app use TTables? I am referring to the problem
described in http://community.borland.com/article/0,1410,28160,00.html
--
Bill (TeamB)
TeamB cannot answer questions received via email
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Don Gollahon Guest
|
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2004 12:31 am Post subject: Re: Time for me to move away from Paradox? |
|
|
"Bill Todd" <no (AT) no (DOT) com> wrote
Initially, with IB Express, there were some problems. But IBObjects worked
better. TTables are implemented differently. Eventually I did go thru and
convert to TIBOQueries to get the full capabilities of SQL. But to get an
app going quickly on Client/Server from Paradox the straight conversion
worked well. IBPump is a great tool to easily transfer the data itself. It
is freeware:
http://www.clevercomponents.com/products/datapump/ibdatapump.asp
--
_________________________________________
Don Gollahon
[email]dlgllhn (AT) InHisStepsSoftware (DOT) com[/email]
ICQ#: 115831669
"What in Eternity does it matter?"
_________________________________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark Thorogood Guest
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 7:04 pm Post subject: Re: Time for me to move away from Paradox? |
|
|
Hi All
FYI, after creating an application to test the performance and connectivity
issues of various Paradox replacement databases we have chosen the Advantage
Local Server database although I will be monitoring the situation regarding
the next version of NexusDB which I was generally impressed with. Main
reasons for selection were:
1. Free Local Server.
2. Free ADO and ODBC drivers worked correctly with many of our 3rd party
software e.g. Visio for Enterprise Architechs, Microsoft Visio Modeller
although if used ADO would either use MS Access or MSDE due to better
performance.
3. Performance was good for both SQL and direct table connections (although
embedded NexusDB in many of my tests was significantly faster on my Athlon
64 PC, similar performance on slower machines)
4. Import data tool very comprehensive and worked well.
5. Support looks good as I had found a bug in the version of the ADO driver
I was using and issue was dealt with promptly.
6. Although the database configuration tool looks a bit dated (hint <g>) it
is comprehensive enough to carry out most of the tasks you would expect.
Thanks to all who responded.
Regards
Mark Thorogood
"Mark Thorogood" <mark (AT) thorogoodsoftware (DOT) co.uk> wrote
| Quote: | Hi
We have been using Paradox (with much success) as our main database for
desktop based applications for around 7 years. I now feel it is time to
move to another format due to depreciated BDE and general lack of further
development.
I am interested in others opinions regarding the suitability of the
following as a replacement:
1. Advantage Local Server - This appears free (cannot complain about
that!) and has a server edition that is useful if application requires it
(although we tend to use MSDE where we need to support a small number of
concurrent users, and would generally prefer MS SQL Server for greater
numbers).
2. DBISAM - cost involved, Delphi Informant 2004 Best Database Engine
Award.
3. NexusDB - Just released a free version of their Embedded Single user
edition (not crippled in any way), I am very interested in their
developments regarding an ADO Provider which should operate within the
Compact Framework (we do quite a bit of development on PDAs).
Regards
Mark Thorogood - Managing Director/Senior Developer, Thorogood Software
Limited
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|