| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Ted Guest
|
Posted: Fri May 07, 2004 10:43 am Post subject: Update 1: Is that all after two years ? |
|
|
Three IDE bugs, a few in VCL / RTL and all the rest fix db comps.
Sorry but, is that all ? In QC there are hundrents of serious D7 bugs
waiting two years for a fix, and now Borland release just this one ?
Ted
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Oliver Giesen Guest
|
Posted: Fri May 07, 2004 10:50 am Post subject: Re: Update 1: Is that all after two years ? |
|
|
Ted wrote:
| Quote: | Three IDE bugs, a few in VCL / RTL and all the rest fix db comps.
Sorry but, is that all ? In QC there are hundrents of serious D7 bugs
waiting two years for a fix, and now Borland release just this one ?
|
I'm afraid you couldn't really count that way. You'd probably have to
measure the time from when they finished D8.NET . I don't think they had
time to do anything on D7 before that...
I'd also like to see that multi-monitor bug (#2562) fixed that has
existed since D6 and which still keeps me switching back to D5 out of
sheer frustration but I guess so everyone else has their pet bugs as
well... still hoping it might have been fixed in silence... still
couldn't test it though as I couldn't even download the update... (see
other thread).
Cheers,
Oliver
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Robert MacLean Guest
|
Posted: Fri May 07, 2004 11:03 am Post subject: Re: Update 1: Is that all after two years ? |
|
|
Ted <no (AT) email (DOT) pls> wrote:
| Quote: | In QC there are hundrents of serious D7 bugs
waiting two years for a fix
|
as far as I understood it bugs were corrected based on votes. The more votes the
higher the likelyness a bug would be fixed.
so these were fixed based on what the people wanted.
--
Robert MacLean
http://www.sadev.co.za
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dave Nottage (TeamB) Guest
|
Posted: Fri May 07, 2004 11:05 am Post subject: Re: Update 1: Is that all after two years ? |
|
|
Ted wrote:
| Quote: | Three IDE bugs, a few in VCL / RTL and all the rest fix db comps.
Sorry but, is that all ? In QC there are hundrents of serious D7 bugs
waiting two years for a fix, and now Borland release just this one ?
|
There were 146 issues addressed in this update. Some of the issues
addressed could be considered significant.
There are a number of issues outstanding that cannot be addressed in an
update using current practices. One of those practices is that updates
do not break unit signatures, eg if a fix requires a change to the
declaration of a class, it will not be included in an update. It might
pay to bear this in mind when entering or voting for reports in QC.
Either that, or request that Borland change it's policy on what is
included in updates <g>
--
Dave Nottage (TeamB)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ulrich Kobsa Guest
|
Posted: Fri May 07, 2004 11:09 am Post subject: Re: Update 1: Is that all after two years ? |
|
|
Ted wrote:
| Quote: | Three IDE bugs, a few in VCL / RTL and all the rest fix db comps.
Sorry but, is that all ? In QC there are hundrents of serious D7 bugs
waiting two years for a fix, and now Borland release just this one ?
Ted
|
Ted,
Have you voted on QC for the issues you like to have resolved?
<frustration>
First people cried for needing a patch and why it lasts so long. Ok,
now Borland gives us the patch and now claiming starts why issue xyz
isnīt in it.
What would happen, when Borland decides to fix all the bugs in previous
versions? Iīm sure that after some few monthes everyone will ask why
Borland doesnīt release Delphi 9.
</frustration>
just my own opinion.
Ulrich
--
Ulrich Kobsa
Posted using XanaNews 1.16.3.1
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dave Nottage (TeamB) Guest
|
Posted: Fri May 07, 2004 11:15 am Post subject: Re: Update 1: Is that all after two years ? |
|
|
Dave Nottage (TeamB) wrote:
| Quote: | eg if a fix requires a change to the declaration of a class
|
arrghh.. I meant to add: "in the interface section"
Anyway, a change in unit signature probably includes most changes to
the interface section of a unit.
--
Dave Nottage (TeamB)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lauchlan M Guest
|
Posted: Fri May 07, 2004 11:18 am Post subject: Re: Update 1: Is that all after two years ? |
|
|
| Quote: | I'm afraid you couldn't really count that way. You'd probably have to
measure the time from when they finished D8.NET . I don't think they had
time to do anything on D7 before that...
|
That logic seems odd to me. You think that they shouldn't support their
product from the date when they release it?
Lauchlan M
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Oliver Giesen Guest
|
Posted: Fri May 07, 2004 11:24 am Post subject: Re: Update 1: Is that all after two years ? |
|
|
Lauchlan M wrote:
| Quote: | I'm afraid you couldn't really count that way. You'd probably have to
measure the time from when they finished D8.NET . I don't think they had
time to do anything on D7 before that...
That logic seems odd to me. You think that they shouldn't support their
product from the date when they release it?
|
No, that's not what I wrote at all. I was just pointing out that you
shouldn't look at the update as "that's all they've managed to produce
in two years time?!" but rather "that's all they've managed to produce
in six months time?!"... ;)
Cheers,
Oliver
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dave Nottage (TeamB) Guest
|
Posted: Fri May 07, 2004 11:56 am Post subject: Re: Update 1: Is that all after two years ? |
|
|
Oliver Giesen wrote:
| Quote: | No, that's not what I wrote at all. I was just pointing out that you
shouldn't look at the update as "that's all they've managed to
produce in two years time?!" but rather "that's all they've managed
to produce in six months time?!"...
|
I expect Lachlan meant that there is the possibility that they could
work on both simultaneously. That would probably have meant that D8
would have shipped even later, which probably would have been OK for
those not interested in D8.
Bottom line is that you can please more people if you have resources
that you don't really have <g>
--
Dave Nottage (TeamB)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Colin Wilson Guest
|
Posted: Fri May 07, 2004 12:08 pm Post subject: Re: Update 1: Is that all after two years ? |
|
|
Ted wrote:
| Quote: | Three IDE bugs, a few in VCL / RTL and all the rest fix db comps.
Sorry but, is that all ? In QC there are hundrents of serious D7 bugs
waiting two years for a fix, and now Borland release just this one ?
|
Hmmm. Let's have a look at my 'QC' reported bugs...
6582 - Definition for TranslateCharsetInfo is wrong in Windows.pas
Not fixed in D7.1
5632 - THashedStringList ignores NameValueSeparator property
Fixed in D7.1!
2382 - TListView doesn't update correctly in OwnerData mode.
Not fixed in D7.1. That sucks. It's an irritating bug, and
would have been trivial to fix.
2362 - 'Help On Help' doesn't work as expected
Not fixed in D7.1
2361 - 'OnHelp' prevents help system from working.
Not fixed in D7.1
2282 - Move, Size & Maximize missing from taskbar popup menu in Delphi
apps
Not fixed in D7.1. Not that I expected it to be!
544 - BRCC does not allow a dot in resource names
Not fixed in D7.1. Probably because hell hasn't yet frozen over.
So 1 fix for 7 bug reports. Go QC - Go!!!!
--
Colin - using XanaNews HTTP Transport
e-mail :colin (AT) wilsonc (DOT) demon.co.uk
web: http://www.wilsonc.demon.co.uk/delphi.htm
Posted with XanaNews 1.16.3.1
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Craig Stuntz [TeamB] Guest
|
Posted: Fri May 07, 2004 1:14 pm Post subject: Re: Update 1: Is that all after two years ? |
|
|
Colin Wilson wrote:
| Quote: | 544 - BRCC does not allow a dot in resource names
Not fixed in D7.1. Probably because hell hasn't yet frozen
over.
|
I imagine you are correct. :)
-Craig
--
Craig Stuntz [TeamB] · Vertex Systems Corp. · Columbus, OH
Delphi/InterBase Weblog : http://delphi.weblogs.com
Useful articles about InterBase and Delphi development:
http://delphi.weblogs.com/articles
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
marc hoffman Guest
|
Posted: Fri May 07, 2004 2:15 pm Post subject: Re: Update 1: Is that all after two years ? |
|
|
Dave,
| Quote: | There were 146 issues addressed in this update. Some of the issues
addressed could be considered significant.
|
and here i was under the impression, all this time, that Delphi 7 didn't
/have/ any significant bugs... ;-P
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Colin Wilson Guest
|
Posted: Fri May 07, 2004 3:11 pm Post subject: Re: Update 1: Is that all after two years ? |
|
|
Colin Wilson wrote:
| Quote: | 6582 - Definition for TranslateCharsetInfo is wrong in Windows.pas
Not fixed in D7.1
|
.... maybe because it would change the interface - which is fair enough
I guess...
--
Colin - using XanaNews HTTP Transport
e-mail :colin (AT) wilsonc (DOT) demon.co.uk
web: http://www.wilsonc.demon.co.uk/delphi.htm
Posted with XanaNews 1.16.3.1
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Robert Cerny Guest
|
Posted: Fri May 07, 2004 3:24 pm Post subject: Re: Update 1: Is that all after two years ? |
|
|
"Dave Nottage (TeamB)" <dnottage (AT) bigpond (DOT) net.au> wrote
| Quote: |
Bottom line is that you can please more people if you have resources
that you don't really have
|
Fixing bugs really does not require much resources. QA, thorough testing is
the thing that requires some significant resources. Borland does not
allocate much resources for QA, so this job is done by customers, so they
should at least allocate minimal resources to fix reported bugs (usually
well narrowed problems). But Borland has typical enterprise organizational
problems, too big adminitration, so every slightest change must go through
tons of paperwork. Consequently, a developer needs few minutes to hours for
fix things and test fixes and then months to push it over all paperwork.
This is also very frustrating for developers.
--
Robert Cerny
DelphiShaman
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Peter Sirca Guest
|
Posted: Fri May 07, 2004 3:30 pm Post subject: Re: Update 1: Is that all after two years ? |
|
|
| Quote: | 6582 - Definition for TranslateCharsetInfo is wrong in Windows.pas
Not fixed in D7.1
... maybe because it would change the interface - which is fair enough
I guess...
|
Hehehe, briliantly executed
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|