| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
John Borchers Guest
|
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:24 pm Post subject: Using Freeware Libraries |
|
|
All,
Anyone know how many software companies get away with using freeware
source / components in their retail product when the GNU freeware license
clearly prohibits this? Are they just gambling?
JB
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris Uzdavinis (TeamB) Guest
|
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2005 9:14 pm Post subject: Re: Using Freeware Libraries |
|
|
"John Borchers" <jborchers (AT) notmail (DOT) com> writes:
| Quote: | All,
Anyone know how many software companies get away with using freeware
source / components in their retail product when the GNU freeware license
clearly prohibits this? Are they just gambling?
|
I think your question is unanswerable. But a few points:
Not all free libraries are licensed under the GPL.
Retail products can use GPL-licensed software, if they're willing to
distribute their code.
Violations of the GPL, when caught, can be expensive. It's not
freeware in the sense of public domain. It's protected under
copyright law, with the same degree of protection as any closed-source
code. Getting caught for violating copyright law is not a minor
offense, and consequently, almost every guilty party who has been
caught and pressed on the issue has settled out of court. The
general understanding why people don't want to go to court when caught
violating the GPL is that they know they'll lose.
So yes, it's a stupid gamble to violate the license agreement. Use
the code only under the conditions of the license, or don't use the
GPL'd code. It's pretty simple.
--
Chris (TeamB);
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ed Mulroy [TeamB] Guest
|
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2005 9:41 pm Post subject: Re: Using Freeware Libraries |
|
|
Freeware is good. In general GNU things are GPL licensed. Do not
confuse GPL with freeware.
The GPL license and especially the descriptions of it you see around
are worded to make it appear that it is allowed to be used for
commercial products. However if you intend to do that you should go
back and read what restrictions and requirements the license demands.
In general it is not a viable option for commercial products.
Some companies offer the same software under both the GPL and under
their own license so you can arrange to use it under the company's
license.
.. Ed
| Quote: | John Borchers wrote in message
news:42288bc9$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
All,
Anyone know how many software companies get away with using
freeware source / components in their retail product when the GNU
freeware license clearly prohibits this? Are they just gambling?
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bruce Salzman Guest
|
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:17 pm Post subject: Re: Using Freeware Libraries |
|
|
| Quote: | Retail products can use GPL-licensed software, if they're willing to
distribute their code.
|
My understanding is that if you use the GPL'd software without
modification, you don't have to disclose your own code. Once you
modify it, you are opting in to the open-source aspects of the
project.
--
Bruce
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Randall Parker Guest
|
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:20 am Post subject: Re: Using Freeware Libraries |
|
|
John,
How many GPL libraries are there? I come across useful neat libraries under LGPL and
even less restrictive licenses. At least for my work I have not come across GPL
libraries that I have even wanted to use in my commercial development.
John Borchers wrote:
| Quote: | All,
Anyone know how many software companies get away with using freeware
source / components in their retail product when the GNU freeware license
clearly prohibits this? Are they just gambling?
JB
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Micha Nelissen Guest
|
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2005 8:45 am Post subject: Re: Using Freeware Libraries |
|
|
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:24:43 -0500
"John Borchers" <jborchers (AT) notmail (DOT) com> wrote:
| Quote: | Anyone know how many software companies get away with using freeware
source / components in their retail product when the GNU freeware license
clearly prohibits this? Are they just gambling?
|
No, yes . I think there have been quite some companies taking the "gamble"... iptables/netfilter team for instance has identified some companies using their code without distributing modified source, and engaged them with success.
Micha
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
OBones Guest
|
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2005 9:03 am Post subject: Re: Using Freeware Libraries |
|
|
Bruce Salzman wrote:
| Quote: | Retail products can use GPL-licensed software, if they're willing to
distribute their code.
My understanding is that if you use the GPL'd software without
modification, you don't have to disclose your own code. Once you
modify it, you are opting in to the open-source aspects of the
project.
|
Nope, the mere fact of linking in GPL'd code requires you to publish the
code using it under GPL.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bruce Salzman Guest
|
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2005 4:55 pm Post subject: Re: Using Freeware Libraries |
|
|
| Quote: | My understanding is that if you use the GPL'd software without
modification, you don't have to disclose your own code. Once you modify
it, you are opting in to the open-source aspects of the project.
Nope, the mere fact of linking in GPL'd code requires you to publish the
code using it under GPL.
|
Yeah, you're right I was thinking of the Mozilla Public License which talks
about Modifications.
--
Bruce
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Micha Nelissen Guest
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2005 12:29 pm Post subject: Re: Using Freeware Libraries |
|
|
On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 10:03:49 +0100
OBones <obones_gfe_ (AT) _gt_altern (DOT) org> wrote:
| Quote: | Nope, the mere fact of linking in GPL'd code requires you to publish the
code using it under GPL.
|
Actually, that is not entirely true: you only need to provide sources to people to whom you distribute the binary.
Micha
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Graeme Prentice Guest
|
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 12:24 am Post subject: Re: Using Freeware Libraries |
|
|
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 13:29:25 +0100, Micha Nelissen wrote:
| Quote: | On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 10:03:49 +0100
OBones <obones_gfe_ (AT) _gt_altern (DOT) org> wrote:
Nope, the mere fact of linking in GPL'd code requires you to publish the
code using it under GPL.
Actually, that is not entirely true: you only need to provide sources to people to whom you distribute the binary.
Micha
|
Are you allowed to restrict the rights of those people to distribute
the source?
Graeme
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Peter Agricola Guest
|
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 8:07 am Post subject: Re: Using Freeware Libraries |
|
|
"Graeme Prentice" wrote:
| Quote: | Nope, the mere fact of linking in GPL'd code requires you to publish the
code using it under GPL.
Actually, that is not entirely true: you only need to provide sources to
people to whom
you distribute the binary.
Are you allowed to restrict the rights of those people to distribute
the source?
|
No. But neither are those people obligated to redistribute the binary. If
they do however they have to make the source available too.
This is an important aspect of the licence. For in-house applications you
can freely use GPL'd source. Be aware of complications when the company is
(partially) sold.
But I think when using GPL'd source, or any other open source software, it
is wise to give the modifications back to the community. The community will
improve the quality of your code for free .
Peter
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John Borchers Guest
|
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 12:41 pm Post subject: Re: Using Freeware Libraries |
|
|
All,
Thanks for the many answers.
We decided in the beginning not to use the GPL source in the project. We
would have contacted the original creators and tried to aquire an exception
to the license for commercial use. The GPL source had limitations (not
license but operation) so we took a step back, checked patents and spun our
own. The problem this causes us is we are not directly compatible. We'll
find out whether or not it works out for us in the future.
I raised the question after reading the GPL license and seeing a single
competitior product using the source and libraries. Even the specification
on this particular file format is copyrighted and part of the GPL. Either
that company got a license arrangement or is taking the gamble.
Regards,
John Borchers
"John Borchers" <jborchers (AT) notmail (DOT) com> wrote
| Quote: | All,
Anyone know how many software companies get away with using freeware
source / components in their retail product when the GNU freeware license
clearly prohibits this? Are they just gambling?
JB
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marian Krivos Guest
|
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 1:33 pm Post subject: Re: Using Freeware Libraries |
|
|
John Borchers wrote:
| Quote: | All,
Anyone know how many software companies get away with using freeware
source / components in their retail product when the GNU freeware license
clearly prohibits this? Are they just gambling?
JB
|
Most of free libraries are under LGPL 2 - it is not that restrictive.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|