 |
BorlandTalk.com Borland discussion newsgroups
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Digby Millikan Guest
|
Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2003 11:21 am Post subject: VCL and VCL.NET |
|
|
Whats the different between a Win32 compiler and a .NET compiler
do the controls look different or does the compiler just compile the
code differently.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Remy Lebeau (TeamB) Guest
|
Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2003 6:15 pm Post subject: Re: VCL and VCL.NET |
|
|
"Digby Millikan" <digbym (AT) internode (DOT) on.net> wrote
| Quote: | Whats the different between a Win32 compiler and a .NET compiler
|
Win32 and .NET are completely different architectures, different platforms,
different APIs. The difference in the *compilers* is that they do produce
different output code to run under each platform, depending on what you are
actually compiling for.
Gambit
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Edward Diener Guest
|
Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2003 10:59 pm Post subject: Re: VCL and VCL.NET |
|
|
Digby Millikan wrote:
| Quote: | Whats the different between a Win32 compiler and a .NET compiler
do the controls look different or does the compiler just compile the
code differently.
|
The programming is different, but the end result looks the same.
Win32 is purely a procedural programming paradigm.
..NET, like the VCL, is a RAD, visual designer/object manipulator,
component-based OOP programming paradigm.
wxWindows is an OOP programming paradigm, but there is no RAD, little visual
design, no visual object manipulator, and no components, although of course
there is a class framework.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Digby Millikan Guest
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2003 5:29 pm Post subject: Re: VCL and VCL.NET |
|
|
Sorry Ed, thanks for the reply I sent my last post to your email address
instead of the newsgroup sever (:
"Edward Diener" <eddielee (AT) tropicsoft (DOT) com> wrote
| Quote: |
.NET, like the VCL, is a RAD, visual designer/object manipulator,
component-based OOP programming paradigm.
|
Why doesn't Borland go for .NET RAD instead of wxWindows?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Edward Diener Guest
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2003 6:36 pm Post subject: Re: VCL and VCL.NET |
|
|
Digby Millikan wrote:
| Quote: | Sorry Ed, thanks for the reply I sent my last post to your email
address instead of the newsgroup sever (:
"Edward Diener" <eddielee (AT) tropicsoft (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:3fac23cd (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
.NET, like the VCL, is a RAD, visual designer/object manipulator,
component-based OOP programming paradigm.
Why doesn't Borland go for .NET RAD instead of wxWindows?
|
They are. One of the promises is .NET Managed C++ with VCL support and .NET
VCL classes. They already have a .NET Delphi. But they are touting wxWindows
for cross-platform programming.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Digby Millikan Guest
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2003 6:41 pm Post subject: Re: VCL and VCL.NET |
|
|
Edward,
Is this for CBX?
Digby
"Edward Diener" <eddielee (AT) tropicsoft (DOT) com> wrote
| Quote: | Digby Millikan wrote:
Sorry Ed, thanks for the reply I sent my last post to your email
address instead of the newsgroup sever (:
"Edward Diener" <eddielee (AT) tropicsoft (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:3fac23cd (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
.NET, like the VCL, is a RAD, visual designer/object manipulator,
component-based OOP programming paradigm.
Why doesn't Borland go for .NET RAD instead of wxWindows?
They are. One of the promises is .NET Managed C++ with VCL support and
..NET
VCL classes. They already have a .NET Delphi. But they are touting
wxWindows
for cross-platform programming.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Edward Diener Guest
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2003 7:07 pm Post subject: Re: VCL and VCL.NET |
|
|
Digby Millikan wrote:
| Quote: | Edward,
Is this for CBX?
|
Not now, but it is supposed to be in the future.
Borland has given their usual promises, and we wait to see if and when they
will be fulfilled. CBX, in the future, is supposed to support managed C++
..NET, cross-platform wxWindows, and BCB RAD + VCL. What it will actually
support I don't think anyone knows for sure outside of Borland. The way this
whole situation with CBX has been handled is a fiasco. Why Borland is still
so asleep concerning C++ is beyond even Nostradamus' guess. But since
supposedly they are being profitable, I don't think they really care.
I don't take much of anything corporations say seriously anymore. I have now
been out of work for two years and three months, and I can honestly say that
I have been lied to by nearly every company, corporation, agency, and
business with which I have had any contact during that time. I am sure there
are some honest business people out there, but it has been next to
impossible finding any.
| Quote: |
Digby
"Edward Diener" <eddielee (AT) tropicsoft (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:3fad37b9$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
Digby Millikan wrote:
Sorry Ed, thanks for the reply I sent my last post to your email
address instead of the newsgroup sever (:
"Edward Diener" <eddielee (AT) tropicsoft (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:3fac23cd (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
.NET, like the VCL, is a RAD, visual designer/object manipulator,
component-based OOP programming paradigm.
Why doesn't Borland go for .NET RAD instead of wxWindows?
They are. One of the promises is .NET Managed C++ with VCL support
and .NET VCL classes. They already have a .NET Delphi. But they are
touting wxWindows for cross-platform programming.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Digby Millikan Guest
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2003 7:29 pm Post subject: Re: VCL and VCL.NET |
|
|
What do you program in now? Are you developing your own projects?
Digby Millikan
"Edward Diener" <eddielee (AT) tropicsoft (DOT) com> wrote
| Quote: | Digby Millikan wrote:
Edward,
Is this for CBX?
Not now, but it is supposed to be in the future.
Borland has given their usual promises, and we wait to see if and when
they
will be fulfilled. CBX, in the future, is supposed to support managed C++
.NET, cross-platform wxWindows, and BCB RAD + VCL. What it will actually
support I don't think anyone knows for sure outside of Borland. The way
this
whole situation with CBX has been handled is a fiasco. Why Borland is
still
so asleep concerning C++ is beyond even Nostradamus' guess. But since
supposedly they are being profitable, I don't think they really care.
I don't take much of anything corporations say seriously anymore. I have
now
been out of work for two years and three months, and I can honestly say
that
I have been lied to by nearly every company, corporation, agency, and
business with which I have had any contact during that time. I am sure
there
are some honest business people out there, but it has been next to
impossible finding any.
Digby
"Edward Diener" <eddielee (AT) tropicsoft (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:3fad37b9$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
Digby Millikan wrote:
Sorry Ed, thanks for the reply I sent my last post to your email
address instead of the newsgroup sever (:
"Edward Diener" <eddielee (AT) tropicsoft (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:3fac23cd (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
.NET, like the VCL, is a RAD, visual designer/object manipulator,
component-based OOP programming paradigm.
Why doesn't Borland go for .NET RAD instead of wxWindows?
They are. One of the promises is .NET Managed C++ with VCL support
and .NET VCL classes. They already have a .NET Delphi. But they are
touting wxWindows for cross-platform programming.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ed Mulroy [TeamB] Guest
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2003 7:42 pm Post subject: Re: VCL and VCL.NET |
|
|
| Quote: | Why doesn't Borland go for .NET RAD instead of wxWindows?
|
http://www.borland.com/csharpbuilder/
.. Ed
| Quote: | Digby Millikan wrote in message
news:3fad2801 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Edward Diener Guest
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2003 8:12 pm Post subject: Re: VCL and VCL.NET |
|
|
Digby Millikan wrote:
| Quote: | What do you program in now? Are you developing your own projects?
|
I program in C++, C#, and Java. I have things I am working on, some C++
Builder components which I am also implementing on .NET in managed C++. I
may not release them for C++ Builder now that Borland has squashed its
future but I will focus on a .NET release. The components can also be
JavaBeans so I am working on that also.
Almost all my personal projects are re-usable components. I have some free
ones at http://www.tropicsoft.com/Components/RegularExpression , but all
other future components will be products at low prices. That is if I can
survive as a programmer, which looks more and more doubtful. If I could find
another profession which would enable me to find a decent job, I would, and
only program at nights and on weekends. But even the latter has been
impossible.
| Quote: |
Digby Millikan
"Edward Diener" <eddielee (AT) tropicsoft (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:3fad3ed8$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
Digby Millikan wrote:
Edward,
Is this for CBX?
Not now, but it is supposed to be in the future.
Borland has given their usual promises, and we wait to see if and
when they will be fulfilled. CBX, in the future, is supposed to
support managed C++ .NET, cross-platform wxWindows, and BCB RAD +
VCL. What it will actually support I don't think anyone knows for
sure outside of Borland. The way this whole situation with CBX has
been handled is a fiasco. Why Borland is still so asleep concerning
C++ is beyond even Nostradamus' guess. But since supposedly they are
being profitable, I don't think they really care.
I don't take much of anything corporations say seriously anymore. I
have now been out of work for two years and three months, and I can
honestly say that I have been lied to by nearly every company,
corporation, agency, and business with which I have had any contact
during that time. I am sure there are some honest business people
out there, but it has been next to impossible finding any.
Digby
"Edward Diener" <eddielee (AT) tropicsoft (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:3fad37b9$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
Digby Millikan wrote:
Sorry Ed, thanks for the reply I sent my last post to your email
address instead of the newsgroup sever (:
"Edward Diener" <eddielee (AT) tropicsoft (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:3fac23cd (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
.NET, like the VCL, is a RAD, visual designer/object manipulator,
component-based OOP programming paradigm.
Why doesn't Borland go for .NET RAD instead of wxWindows?
They are. One of the promises is .NET Managed C++ with VCL support
and .NET VCL classes. They already have a .NET Delphi. But they are
touting wxWindows for cross-platform programming.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Digby Millikan Guest
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2003 8:57 pm Post subject: Re: VCL and VCL.NET |
|
|
I am a mining engineer and am getting too old and sick of moving around
and living in the outback, there is limited employment oppurtunities in my
home city so I've taken up mine software development, but have a digitiser
and plotter so am able to offer basic digitising and plotting services in
addition
to the supply of software. My plan is to sell a single software package
designed
from the ground up to compete with with larger packages on the market
supplied
by major software houses.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jblogs Guest
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2003 11:20 pm Post subject: Re: VCL and VCL.NET |
|
|
Does wxWindows support .NET?
Edward Diener wrote:
| Quote: | Digby Millikan wrote:
Sorry Ed, thanks for the reply I sent my last post to your email
address instead of the newsgroup sever (:
"Edward Diener" <eddielee (AT) tropicsoft (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:3fac23cd (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
.NET, like the VCL, is a RAD, visual designer/object manipulator,
component-based OOP programming paradigm.
Why doesn't Borland go for .NET RAD instead of wxWindows?
They are. One of the promises is .NET Managed C++ with VCL support and .NET
VCL classes. They already have a .NET Delphi. But they are touting wxWindows
for cross-platform programming.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jblogs Guest
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2003 11:20 pm Post subject: Re: VCL and VCL.NET |
|
|
Does wxWindows support .NET?
Edward Diener wrote:
| Quote: | Digby Millikan wrote:
Sorry Ed, thanks for the reply I sent my last post to your email
address instead of the newsgroup sever (:
"Edward Diener" <eddielee (AT) tropicsoft (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:3fac23cd (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
.NET, like the VCL, is a RAD, visual designer/object manipulator,
component-based OOP programming paradigm.
Why doesn't Borland go for .NET RAD instead of wxWindows?
They are. One of the promises is .NET Managed C++ with VCL support and .NET
VCL classes. They already have a .NET Delphi. But they are touting wxWindows
for cross-platform programming.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jblogs Guest
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2003 11:22 pm Post subject: Re: VCL and VCL.NET |
|
|
Does wxWindows support .NET?
Edward Diener wrote:
| Quote: | Digby Millikan wrote:
Sorry Ed, thanks for the reply I sent my last post to your email
address instead of the newsgroup sever (:
"Edward Diener" <eddielee (AT) tropicsoft (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:3fac23cd (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
.NET, like the VCL, is a RAD, visual designer/object manipulator,
component-based OOP programming paradigm.
Why doesn't Borland go for .NET RAD instead of wxWindows?
They are. One of the promises is .NET Managed C++ with VCL support and .NET
VCL classes. They already have a .NET Delphi. But they are touting wxWindows
for cross-platform programming.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marcelo R. Lopez, Jr. Guest
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2003 4:51 pm Post subject: Re: VCL and VCL.NET |
|
|
Ed......get real....C#Builder 1.0 was, and is, still a BETA in a Released
Products fleece. There
were so many bugs that within 2 weeks of it's release, update 1 was
released.
"Ed Mulroy [TeamB]" <dont_email_me (AT) bitbuc (DOT) ket> wrote
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|