 |
BorlandTalk.com Borland discussion newsgroups
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Marcelo Carvalho Guest
|
Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2004 5:10 am Post subject: WebBroker enhancements (D7 AND D8) |
|
|
Hi,
BESIDES the request to have WebBroker in D8* (the .Net version and the coming
Win32 version), we can suggest some improvements for it (could be done in some
service pack for D7 too):
- Multiple WebModules. The ideal would be to have real multiple WebModules,
instanced separated in memory depending on the invoked action or path info,
avoiding allocating all resources, as it happens when loading a single
webmodule holding all components, code and data.
- If not possible to have real multiple webmodules, it would be nice to have at
least many virtual modules for project organization purposes - or something
like a "paged" webmodule.
- Ability to include "captions", "bevels" or "group boxes" to the webmodules
just for organization purposes. Should work like comments... For example, it
would help to find and manage lots of PageProducers in a large project.
These are my "two cents". I LOVE WebBroker!
[][][][]
Marcelo.
*See my answer to James McNeil post, with the reasons for that!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
James A. McNeil Guest
|
Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2004 5:59 pm Post subject: Re: WebBroker enhancements (D7 AND D8) |
|
|
Marcelo,
My approach to use the WebModule only for dispatching and handling the Web
request. All the logic and component I use are located on separate units or
datamodules. To me the WebModule is a link to WebBroker and nothing else.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
James Bunting Guest
|
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2004 7:21 pm Post subject: Re: WebBroker enhancements (D7 AND D8) |
|
|
| Quote: | My approach to use the WebModule only for dispatching and handling the Web
request. All the logic and component I use are located on separate units
or
datamodules. To me the WebModule is a link to WebBroker and nothing else.
|
Or, you can access a remote server program, using a Socket or Web
connection. There you can have as many datamodules as you like. It works
well from my IntraWeb application, have yet to try it from WebBroker but it
must be just the same....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marcelo Carvalho Guest
|
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2004 2:02 am Post subject: Re: WebBroker enhancements (D7 AND D8) |
|
|
Hi,
We don't need WebBroker really. When in D4, when WebBroker was optional in
some versions, I did my ISAPI/CGIs using console programming. An it worked very
well. There are many "work-arounds"...
But we are talking about RAD - and WebBroker is an useful tool for many
situations. Of course I'm not talking that it can replace high level tools like
IW or ASP.Net.
[][][][]
Marcelo.
"James Bunting" <jpb (AT) smxiREM0VE (DOT) com> escreveu na mensagem
news:402bd1e6$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
| Quote: | My approach to use the WebModule only for dispatching and handling the Web
request. All the logic and component I use are located on separate units
or
datamodules. To me the WebModule is a link to WebBroker and nothing else.
Or, you can access a remote server program, using a Socket or Web
connection. There you can have as many datamodules as you like. It works
well from my IntraWeb application, have yet to try it from WebBroker but it
must be just the same....
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
James A. McNeil Guest
|
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2004 4:28 pm Post subject: Re: WebBroker enhancements (D7 AND D8) |
|
|
Marcelo,
You could do without WebBroker, but why would you want to?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marcelo Carvalho Guest
|
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2004 7:42 pm Post subject: Re: WebBroker enhancements (D7 AND D8) |
|
|
Hi,
We can make programs using Assembly, why do we need Delphi?
This is the concept of the RAD tecnology, enhance productivity. Despite
possible to do without it, WebBroker brings many tools to turn easier to handle
requests, databases and HTML templates. Depending the application, if not
Form/Visual/Session based, even better then IntraWeb, WebSnap, ASP.Net, and so
on.
Also many customers can have lots of applications made with WebBroker that
will need to be continued...
[][][][]
Marcelo.
"James A. McNeil" <none (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> escreveu na mensagem
news:402cfb0e (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
| Quote: | Marcelo,
You could do without WebBroker, but why would you want to?
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|