| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Nate Lockwood Guest
|
Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2004 10:06 pm Post subject: Which Database scheme to use |
|
|
I have a corporate (US Government) credit card for purchases. I've been
keeping track of them via spreadsheets but it has been only marginally
successful as I need to make meaningful reports to my boss and for paper
records so I've been considering using a database to keep track of the
transactions, vendor information, etc.
It appears that there are several methods to database programming under
Builder (I have Builder 6 Pro on an XP machine) and I'd like some advice on
which to pursue. If this works for me I intend to make it available to
others. Each user will have a database on the user's machine, there would
be no sharing over a network.
Any suggestions on this? Or if this is not best group in which one should I
post?
Thanks
Nate
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
William E. Mahaffey Guest
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 3:15 pm Post subject: Re: Which Database scheme to use |
|
|
Nate,
I am using NexusDB, http://www.nexusdb.com/, and am very happy with it.
Might be a little over kill for what you are doing. It does allow single
user and client/server applications.
BCB 6, WinXP Pro
William
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Michael Gillen Guest
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 3:43 pm Post subject: Re: Which Database scheme to use |
|
|
Nate Lockwood wrote:
| Quote: | Any suggestions on this? Or if this is not best group in which one should I
post?
|
I also use NexusDB ([url]http://www.nexusdb.com)[/url]. It will also allow you to expand to a much larger
architecture if you need to.
-Michael
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Leroy Casterline Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:03 am Post subject: Re: Which Database scheme to use |
|
|
"Nate Lockwood" <RNLcokwood-AT-attglobal.net> wrote:
| Quote: | records so I've been considering using a database to keep track of the
transactions, vendor information, etc.
|
I also use NexusDB. Works very well, and they have a free 'lite' version
that may meet your needs. It's identical to the commercial version with
the following limitations:
Maximum of 10.000 records in each table
Maximum of 5 tables in a database
Connect to one server and one database only
No restrictions on distribution. Nexus has an active newsgroup with lots
of people who seem willing to help people get started, and their support
is wonderful.
www.nexusdb.com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nate Lockwood Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 22, 2004 2:37 am Post subject: Re: Which Database scheme to use |
|
|
"Leroy Casterline" <casterle (AT) ccltd (DOT) com> wrote
| Quote: | I also use NexusDB. Works very well, and they have a free 'lite' version
that may meet your needs.
No restrictions on distribution. Nexus has an active newsgroup with lots
of people who seem willing to help people get started, and their support
is wonderful.
|
Thanks to all of you. Do I use Nexus with Builder or is it stand alone?
Nate
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Arnie Mauer Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 22, 2004 3:58 pm Post subject: Re: Which Database scheme to use |
|
|
"Nate Lockwood" <RNLcokwood-AT-attglobal.net> wrote
| Quote: | I have a corporate (US Government) credit card for purchases. I've
been
keeping track of them via spreadsheets but it has been only
marginally
successful as I need to make meaningful reports to my boss and for
paper
records so I've been considering using a database to keep track of
the
transactions, vendor information, etc.
It appears that there are several methods to database programming
under
Builder (I have Builder 6 Pro on an XP machine) and I'd like some
advice on
which to pursue. If this works for me I intend to make it available
to
others. Each user will have a database on the user's machine, there
would
be no sharing over a network.
Any suggestions on this? Or if this is not best group in which one
should I
post?
Thanks
Nate
|
How about MSDE? It offers about the same functionality as SQL Server,
but for a limited number of connections. And, it's free.
- Arnie
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Margerum Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 22, 2004 8:05 pm Post subject: Re: Which Database scheme to use |
|
|
MSDE is an excellent free version of SQL server. It starts to
throttle itself after 5 concurrent connections though.
| Quote: | It appears that there are several methods to database programming under
Builder (I have Builder 6 Pro on an XP machine) and I'd like some advice on
which to pursue. If this works for me I intend to make it available to
others. Each user will have a database on the user's machine, there would
be no sharing over a network.
Any suggestions on this? Or if this is not best group in which one should I
post?
Thanks
Nate
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Leroy Casterline Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 22, 2004 8:58 pm Post subject: Re: Which Database scheme to use |
|
|
"Nate Lockwood" <rnlockwoodNO (AT) SPAMpacbell (DOT) net> wrote:
| Quote: | Thanks to all of you. Do I use Nexus with Builder or is it stand alone?
|
You use it with Builder (or Delphi). It's a BDE replacement so it works
with all of the normal data-aware controls (and those from 3rd parties
as well). As I recall, it's a rewrite of TurboPower's FlashFiler (with
vast improvements) by the same people who wrote FF for TurboPower.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kenneth de Camargo Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 22, 2004 9:29 pm Post subject: Re: Which Database scheme to use |
|
|
Arnie Mauer wrote:
| Quote: | How about MSDE? It offers about the same functionality as SQL
Server, but for a limited number of connections. And, it's free.
|
I got late to this game, but I'd strongly suggest Firebird, Interbase's
opensourced sibling.
--
Ken
http://planeta.terra.com.br/educacao/kencamargo/
* this is not a sig *
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Leroy Casterline Guest
|
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2004 7:21 pm Post subject: Re: Which Database scheme to use |
|
|
"Rodrigo Gómez" <rgomez (AT) tsradio (DOT) com.mx> wrote:
| Quote: | Well.. it's slighty different. The creators of NexusDB were involved in the
design and architecture of FlashFiler 2, Thorsten specially, but they didn't
write the code. NexusDB is all new code, but it "respects" some of the
concepts of FF2.
In anycase, it is a great database!
|
Thanks for the correction. It's a great DB indeed.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jack Hanebach Guest
|
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2004 10:42 pm Post subject: Re: Which Database scheme to use |
|
|
Nate Lockwood wrote:
| Quote: | I have a corporate (US Government) credit card for purchases. I've
been keeping track of them via spreadsheets but it has been only
marginally successful as I need to make meaningful reports to my boss
and for paper records so I've been considering using a database to
keep track of the transactions, vendor information, etc.
|
Wouldn't it make more sense to get Quicken or Microsoft Money? You can even
download your transactions, so no manual track keeping is necessery.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nate Lockwood Guest
|
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2004 7:06 pm Post subject: Re: Which Database scheme to use |
|
|
"Jack Hanebach" <jack.no (AT) spam (DOT) hanebach.net> wrote
| Quote: |
Wouldn't it make more sense to get Quicken or Microsoft Money? You can even
download your transactions, so no manual track keeping is necessery.
|
No, as the transactions are on an internal db with very limited access.
Thanks
Nate
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rolrolrol@web.de Guest
|
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2004 8:16 am Post subject: Re: Which Database scheme to use |
|
|
I am a happy user of DBISAM. A very reliable database which is a TDataSet
descendant and integrates perfectly into the Borland world. It is free and
easy to check it out, licenses are very reasonably priced and you can
distribute without royalities.
www.elevatesoft.com
Roland Wolf
"Nate Lockwood" <RNLcokwood-AT-attglobal.net> wrote:
| Quote: | I have a corporate (US Government) credit card for purchases. I've been
keeping track of them via spreadsheets but it has been only marginally
successful as I need to make meaningful reports to my boss and for paper
records so I've been considering using a database to keep track of the
transactions, vendor information, etc.
It appears that there are several methods to database programming under
Builder (I have Builder 6 Pro on an XP machine) and I'd like some advice
on
which to pursue. If this works for me I intend to make it available to
others. Each user will have a database on the user's machine, there would
be no sharing over a network.
Any suggestions on this? Or if this is not best group in which one should
I post?
Thanks
Nate
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|