| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Randall Parker
Guest
|
 Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2004 11:53 pm Post subject: You get 5 QC votes for each product so use up all your BCB Q |
 |
|
You get 5 votes on BCB and 5 other votes on BCBX. If you haven't used up all your BCB
votes then please do so. Someone from Borland indicated in the bcbx non-technical
group that that there some people in Borland who would like to resurrect BCB.
For BCB I voted on 3 linker bugs:
http://qc.borland.com/wc/wc.exe/details?ReportID=5616
http://qc.borland.com/wc/wc.exe/details?ReportID=6073
http://qc.borland.com/wc/wc.exe/details?ReportID=6258
and for Athlon 64 compatibility
http://qc.borland.com/wc/wc.exe/details?ReportID=7675
and for a longer list of most recently used projects:
http://qc.borland.com/wc/wc.exe/details?ReportID=6004
One thing strikes me about BCB and QC: there are BCB bugs that I hit that are not
reported there. Also, some of the complaints I've seen here do not seem to have QC
entries. If anyone here has BCB problems that are not listed they ought to go put
them into QC.
For instance, every time I first start up BCB and try to build I get an internal
compiler error in my project's _IMPL.cpp file. I have to first compile a few other
files before trying to to a Make that will compile the _IMPL.cpp file. But I don't
see that one mentioned.
I've had other problems with BCB that would be hard to reproduce that I have also not
reported. There is a kind of "project hell" I've gotten into where the internal state
of the project has gotten so munged I've had to roll back to a back-up version. I
don't know what to say to reproduce that and so I wonder what the point would be of
opening a QC entry on it.
One reason to report and vote on BCB bugs in QC at this point is to let Borland know
why existing BCB users will have a problem to continue using BCB if BCBX does not get
a Win32 VCL forms designer, CodeGuard, and anything else that BCB users rely on that
are not in BCBX. It can't hurt to go use up all your BCB votes in Quality Central.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Randall Parker
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dennis Jones
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2004 1:15 am Post subject: Re: You get 5 QC votes for each product so use up all your B |
|
|
"Randall Parker" <STOPtechiepundit (AT) EVILfuturePOXpunditSPAM (DOT) com> wrote in
message news:40734382$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
| Quote: | Someone from Borland indicated in the bcbx non-technical
group that that there some people in Borland who would like to resurrect
BCB. |
Don't tease me. Who said what, and in which thread?
- Dennis
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Randall Parker
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2004 1:33 am Post subject: Re: You get 5 QC votes for each product so use up all your B |
|
|
See the thread "Why can't get CBX update?" in BCBX's non-technical and the post by
Robert Ehteshamzadeh who is in Borland C++ QA. It is from several hours ago.
Dennis Jones wrote:
| Quote: | "Randall Parker" <STOPtechiepundit (AT) EVILfuturePOXpunditSPAM (DOT) com> wrote in
message news:40734382$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com...
Someone from Borland indicated in the bcbx non-technical
group that that there some people in Borland who would like to resurrect
BCB.
Don't tease me. Who said what, and in which thread?
- Dennis
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
