BorlandTalk.com Forum Index BorlandTalk.com
Borland discussion newsgroups
 
Archives   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Your experiences with Borland Paid Support
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BorlandTalk.com Forum Index -> C++ Builder (Non-Technical)
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Ronald McDonald
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2003 11:57 am    Post subject: Your experiences with Borland Paid Support Reply with quote



I'd like to know a little about your experiences with Borland Paid Support,
regarding bugs in their own products.

Has anybody here opened a case with Paid Support and what was your experience?
What was the turn around time, and was the solution adequate for your needs?

If later in the project, the solution provided by Borland turns out to be
insufficient, did you need to pay again to get it sorted?

Any anecdotes greatly appreciated.


Back to top
Kristofer Skaug
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2003 12:38 pm    Post subject: Re: Your experiences with Borland Paid Support Reply with quote



Ronald McDonald wrote:
Quote:

Any anecdotes greatly appreciated.

I'm curious too. Also, can paid support actually result in patches being
generated specifically for you?
And if so, what is the relation to later product patches/updates that are
made available to everyone?

--
Kristofer



Back to top
Scott Metzger
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2003 1:15 pm    Post subject: Re: Your experiences with Borland Paid Support Reply with quote



I have used Borland paid support. I have only used the 10 cases per
year level of support.

These are my experiences:
They work with you until the case is solved or an impass is reached.
Once the case is solved they keep it open for a certain amount of time
to make sure it has been completly solved.
If it ends up being a bug in the product they will not charge a 'case'.
Turnaround time is less than 24 hrs.

Back to top
Kristofer Skaug
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2003 3:15 pm    Post subject: Re: Your experiences with Borland Paid Support Reply with quote

Scott Metzger wrote:
Quote:
If it ends up being a bug in the product they will not charge a
'case'. Turnaround time is less than 24 hrs.

Why would you call for support if there is no bug?
What kind of issues did you have them solve for you?

--
Kristofer



Back to top
Yu-Chen Hsueh
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2003 3:35 pm    Post subject: Re: Your experiences with Borland Paid Support Reply with quote

This is mostly true, but a minor addendum should be made. A bug with no
workaround generally receives a refund. However, with a bug for which a
workaround is provided, then it depends.

-- YH --


"Scott Metzger" <NOSPAMScott.Metzger (AT) york (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
I have used Borland paid support. I have only used the 10 cases per
year level of support.

These are my experiences:
They work with you until the case is solved or an impass is reached.
Once the case is solved they keep it open for a certain amount of time
to make sure it has been completly solved.
If it ends up being a bug in the product they will not charge a 'case'.
Turnaround time is less than 24 hrs.



--
Any e-mail sent to me from the newsgroups will be ignored. Please confine
your posts to the newsgroups and DO NOT reply to this e-mail account.



Back to top
Yu-Chen Hsueh
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2003 3:39 pm    Post subject: Re: Your experiences with Borland Paid Support Reply with quote

Customers call Support for help using the product, i.e. coding questions and
such. Sometimes these involve a bug and sometimes they don't.

Regarding patches, it depends on the level of support, but in general,
custom patches are not provided. Minor VCL source changes and similar
workarounds are often provided, but anything more extensive usually is not.

-- YH --


--
Any e-mail sent to me from the newsgroups will be ignored. Please confine
your posts to the newsgroups and DO NOT reply to this e-mail account.


Back to top
Jeff Overcash (TeamB)
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2003 5:05 pm    Post subject: Re: Your experiences with Borland Paid Support Reply with quote


"Kristofer Skaug" <ya.ierfgnf (AT) thnxf (DOT) x> wrote:
Quote:
Scott Metzger wrote:
If it ends up being a bug in the product they will not charge a
'case'. Turnaround time is less than 24 hrs.

Why would you call for support if there is no bug?

You may call thinking its a bug, but it turns out to be a
misunderstanding on how to use the code (IOW a bug in your
code). Some paid support issues are actually to have Borland
help you with your code because you can't figure out how to do
something (more common with the gold and platinum levels IIRC).



Back to top
mr_organic
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2003 5:06 pm    Post subject: Re: Your experiences with Borland Paid Support Reply with quote

"Dennis Jones" <djones (AT) nospam (DOT) com> wrote in
news:3f98084d$1 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) borland.com:

Quote:
SNIP

rant
Anybody remember the days before (about) Borland C++ 3.x? Remember
how technical support was FREE? Yes FREE! And how often did you have
to call? Not very danged often. Why? (the following is
conjecture/opinion) Because the compilers/IDEs were more stable.
When Borland's products started to go downhill quality-wise (which was
around that same time, in the early 1990's), they had to do something
to keep the phones from ringing off the hook, and paid support was the
way to do it. Yeah, that's it -- charge people for calling! I called
techincal support *very rarely* before then, and it was almost always
to report an IDE bug. By the time I needed to call them again (I
forget when that was, but it was after BC++ 3.x), they were charging
for support...and I've needed some level of tech support much more
often ever since (and not always, although quite often, because of IDE
bugs)! Coincidence? I don't think so, but I'm sure someone will make
an argument against it.
/rant

- Dennis



This is what comes of trying to run your support operations as a profit-
center rather than as a cost-center. When you have to show a profit on
support, all of a sudden *volume* starts to matter more than *quality*.
It means you have to hire entry-level CS people and pay them peanuts to
keep your costs down, in order not to tie up the high-dollar programmers.
It means keeping the case-solution-time low so volume stays up, so lots
of cases are marked as "closed" when they are simply unresolved or "no
action taken" calls.

mr_organic

Back to top
Kristofer Skaug
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2003 6:11 pm    Post subject: Re: Your experiences with Borland Paid Support Reply with quote

Jeff Overcash (TeamB) wrote:
Quote:

You may call thinking its a bug, but it turns out to be a
misunderstanding on how to use the code (IOW a bug in your
code). Some paid support issues are actually to have Borland
help you with your code because you can't figure out how to do
something (more common with the gold and platinum levels IIRC).

I have yet to come across a BCB/Delphi question that I couldn't get
answered for free in these newsgroups!
Hmmmm....

--
Kristofer



Back to top
Jeff Overcash (TeamB)
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2003 6:41 pm    Post subject: Re: Your experiences with Borland Paid Support Reply with quote


"Kristofer Skaug" <ya.ierfgnf (AT) thnxf (DOT) x> wrote:
Quote:
Jeff Overcash (TeamB) wrote:

You may call thinking its a bug, but it turns out to be a
misunderstanding on how to use the code (IOW a bug in your
code). Some paid support issues are actually to have Borland
help you with your code because you can't figure out how to do
something (more common with the gold and platinum levels IIRC).

I have yet to come across a BCB/Delphi question that I couldn't get
answered for free in these newsgroups!
Hmmmm....


That may be true, but corporations would rather pay for support
and get immediate responses instead of waiting an indeterminant
amount of time, if ever, to have something answered on the peer
groups like this one. I agree these groups are invaluable, particularly for smaller shops that want to save money on
support calls.


Back to top
Hugo Duncan
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2003 6:57 pm    Post subject: Re: Your experiences with Borland Paid Support Reply with quote

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 Scott Metzger wrote:

Quote:
These are my experiences:
They work with you until the case is solved or an impass is reached.
Once the case is solved they keep it open for a certain amount of time
to make sure it has been completly solved.
If it ends up being a bug in the product they will not charge a 'case'.
Turnaround time is less than 24 hrs.

We have used per case support.

I can second Scott's experience, and add that recently borland support
together with borland consulting here in canada, managed to get a bug
of long standing fixed. This has made us very happy.

A public thank you.

Hugo


Back to top
Marcelo R. Lopez, Jr.
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2003 7:29 pm    Post subject: Re: Your experiences with Borland Paid Support Reply with quote

In the two occassions where a company I worked at had to use paid support,
one was solved about two weeks later, by a patch to the linker. During the
second incident ( also found to be a linker problem ), the incident was
resolved as being "unresolvable", and was left as is. Word to the
wise.....there IS a limit to how much debugging information ( even with the
newer separated debug files ) you can generate. Hint: Extensive use of
templates will KILL YOU.



"Ronald McDonald" <ldinters (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
I'd like to know a little about your experiences with Borland Paid
Support,
regarding bugs in their own products.

Has anybody here opened a case with Paid Support and what was your
experience?
What was the turn around time, and was the solution adequate for your
needs?

If later in the project, the solution provided by Borland turns out to be
insufficient, did you need to pay again to get it sorted?

Any anecdotes greatly appreciated.





Back to top
Scott Metzger
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2003 7:32 pm    Post subject: Re: Your experiences with Borland Paid Support Reply with quote

Kristofer Skaug wrote:
Quote:
Scott Metzger wrote:

If it ends up being a bug in the product they will not charge a
'case'. Turnaround time is less than 24 hrs.


Why would you call for support if there is no bug?
What kind of issues did you have them solve for you?

Er... because I couldn't figure out the problem and people in newsgroups
couldn't figure out the problem and/or we needed a very fast resolution
to the problem.

Sure if you spend most of your time doing GUIs for database apps your
not going to run into problems that people on the newsgroups can't
solve. But once you venture into CORBA there are a lot fewer people in
the newsgroups that can help you, especially if your using Delphi.

There are some fringe technologies that are poorly documented, aren't
covered in depth in any books, and don't have alot of experts on the
newsgroups. If you are dealing with one of those technologies it
_could_ be a wise choice to spend money on support.

Things I have called for support on:
I had a complex Paradox query that worked in Database Desktop but not in
my App. Ended up being a bug in the BDE; but the guy gave me a
workaround by using DeMorgan's on my SQL.

Delphi 5, TClientDataset, we were adding records to a TClientDataSet by
hand and some of them were not showing up. Ended up being a bug in the
component.

There were a couple that they legitimately helped me on but I can't
remember them right now. I called mostly because my employer bought the
10 cases of support for the year, since I had them I used them. It was
nice to be able to get a "Yes, this is a Borland bug. Stop banging your
head on your keyboard, your doing nothing wrong."



Back to top
Kristofer Skaug
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2003 8:21 pm    Post subject: Re: Your experiences with Borland Paid Support Reply with quote

Jeff Overcash (TeamB) wrote:
Quote:

That may be true, but corporations would rather pay for support
and get immediate responses instead of waiting an indeterminant
amount of time, if ever, to have something answered on the peer
groups like this one.

Can't recall that I've ever had to wait more than 24 hours to get
conclusive help on technical issues in these NG's... and I even suspect
you get more expert and detailed (multiple sources) information here
than from Borland itself. After all, as "peer groups", the NG's are
frequented by people who use Borland tools for a living to develop real
software, and have practical answers to real problems.

--
Kristofer



Back to top
Kristofer Skaug
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2003 8:22 pm    Post subject: Re: Your experiences with Borland Paid Support Reply with quote

Scott Metzger wrote:
Quote:
There are some fringe technologies that are poorly documented, aren't
covered in depth in any books, and don't have alot of experts on the
newsgroups. If you are dealing with one of those technologies it
_could_ be a wise choice to spend money on support.

Ah, good point. Thanks.

--
Kristofer



Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BorlandTalk.com Forum Index -> C++ Builder (Non-Technical) All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group
SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.